Cargando…

Hospitalisation without delirium is not associated with cognitive decline in a population-based sample of older people—results from a nested, longitudinal cohort study

BACKGROUND: Acute hospitalisation and delirium have individually been shown to adversely affect trajectories of cognitive decline but have not previously been considered together. This work aimed to explore the impact on cognition of hospital admission with and without delirium, compared to a contro...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Richardson, Sarah J, Lawson, Rachael, Davis, Daniel H J, Stephan, Blossom C M, Robinson, Louise, Matthews, Fiona E, Brayne, Carol, Barnes, Linda E, Taylor, John-Paul, Parker, Stuart G, Allan, Louise M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8437075/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33945608
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afab068
_version_ 1783752103585382400
author Richardson, Sarah J
Lawson, Rachael
Davis, Daniel H J
Stephan, Blossom C M
Robinson, Louise
Matthews, Fiona E
Brayne, Carol
Barnes, Linda E
Taylor, John-Paul
Parker, Stuart G
Allan, Louise M
author_facet Richardson, Sarah J
Lawson, Rachael
Davis, Daniel H J
Stephan, Blossom C M
Robinson, Louise
Matthews, Fiona E
Brayne, Carol
Barnes, Linda E
Taylor, John-Paul
Parker, Stuart G
Allan, Louise M
author_sort Richardson, Sarah J
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Acute hospitalisation and delirium have individually been shown to adversely affect trajectories of cognitive decline but have not previously been considered together. This work aimed to explore the impact on cognition of hospital admission with and without delirium, compared to a control group with no hospital admissions. METHODS: The Delirium and Cognitive Impact in Dementia (DECIDE) study was nested within the Cognitive Function and Ageing Study II (CFAS II)–Newcastle cohort. CFAS II participants completed two baseline interviews, including the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). During 2016, surviving participants from CFAS II–Newcastle were recruited to DECIDE on admission to hospital. Participants were reviewed daily to determine delirium status. During 2017, all DECIDE participants and age, sex and years of education matched controls without hospital admissions during 2016 were invited to repeat the CFAS II interview. Delirium was excluded in the control group using the Informant Assessment of Geriatric Delirium Scale (i-AGeD). Linear mixed effects modelling determined predictors of cognitive decline. RESULTS: During 2016, 82 of 205 (40%) DECIDE participants had at least one episode of delirium. At 1 year, 135 of 205 hospitalised participants completed an interview along with 100 controls. No controls experienced delirium (i-AGeD>4). Delirium was associated with a faster rate of cognitive decline compared to those without delirium (β = −2.2, P < 0.001), but number of hospital admissions was not (P = 0.447). CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that delirium during hospitalisation rather than hospitalisation per se is a risk factor for future cognitive decline, emphasising the need for dementia prevention studies that focus on delirium intervention.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8437075
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84370752021-09-14 Hospitalisation without delirium is not associated with cognitive decline in a population-based sample of older people—results from a nested, longitudinal cohort study Richardson, Sarah J Lawson, Rachael Davis, Daniel H J Stephan, Blossom C M Robinson, Louise Matthews, Fiona E Brayne, Carol Barnes, Linda E Taylor, John-Paul Parker, Stuart G Allan, Louise M Age Ageing Research Paper BACKGROUND: Acute hospitalisation and delirium have individually been shown to adversely affect trajectories of cognitive decline but have not previously been considered together. This work aimed to explore the impact on cognition of hospital admission with and without delirium, compared to a control group with no hospital admissions. METHODS: The Delirium and Cognitive Impact in Dementia (DECIDE) study was nested within the Cognitive Function and Ageing Study II (CFAS II)–Newcastle cohort. CFAS II participants completed two baseline interviews, including the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). During 2016, surviving participants from CFAS II–Newcastle were recruited to DECIDE on admission to hospital. Participants were reviewed daily to determine delirium status. During 2017, all DECIDE participants and age, sex and years of education matched controls without hospital admissions during 2016 were invited to repeat the CFAS II interview. Delirium was excluded in the control group using the Informant Assessment of Geriatric Delirium Scale (i-AGeD). Linear mixed effects modelling determined predictors of cognitive decline. RESULTS: During 2016, 82 of 205 (40%) DECIDE participants had at least one episode of delirium. At 1 year, 135 of 205 hospitalised participants completed an interview along with 100 controls. No controls experienced delirium (i-AGeD>4). Delirium was associated with a faster rate of cognitive decline compared to those without delirium (β = −2.2, P < 0.001), but number of hospital admissions was not (P = 0.447). CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that delirium during hospitalisation rather than hospitalisation per se is a risk factor for future cognitive decline, emphasising the need for dementia prevention studies that focus on delirium intervention. Oxford University Press 2021-05-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8437075/ /pubmed/33945608 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afab068 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Geriatrics Society. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Paper
Richardson, Sarah J
Lawson, Rachael
Davis, Daniel H J
Stephan, Blossom C M
Robinson, Louise
Matthews, Fiona E
Brayne, Carol
Barnes, Linda E
Taylor, John-Paul
Parker, Stuart G
Allan, Louise M
Hospitalisation without delirium is not associated with cognitive decline in a population-based sample of older people—results from a nested, longitudinal cohort study
title Hospitalisation without delirium is not associated with cognitive decline in a population-based sample of older people—results from a nested, longitudinal cohort study
title_full Hospitalisation without delirium is not associated with cognitive decline in a population-based sample of older people—results from a nested, longitudinal cohort study
title_fullStr Hospitalisation without delirium is not associated with cognitive decline in a population-based sample of older people—results from a nested, longitudinal cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Hospitalisation without delirium is not associated with cognitive decline in a population-based sample of older people—results from a nested, longitudinal cohort study
title_short Hospitalisation without delirium is not associated with cognitive decline in a population-based sample of older people—results from a nested, longitudinal cohort study
title_sort hospitalisation without delirium is not associated with cognitive decline in a population-based sample of older people—results from a nested, longitudinal cohort study
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8437075/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33945608
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afab068
work_keys_str_mv AT richardsonsarahj hospitalisationwithoutdeliriumisnotassociatedwithcognitivedeclineinapopulationbasedsampleofolderpeopleresultsfromanestedlongitudinalcohortstudy
AT lawsonrachael hospitalisationwithoutdeliriumisnotassociatedwithcognitivedeclineinapopulationbasedsampleofolderpeopleresultsfromanestedlongitudinalcohortstudy
AT davisdanielhj hospitalisationwithoutdeliriumisnotassociatedwithcognitivedeclineinapopulationbasedsampleofolderpeopleresultsfromanestedlongitudinalcohortstudy
AT stephanblossomcm hospitalisationwithoutdeliriumisnotassociatedwithcognitivedeclineinapopulationbasedsampleofolderpeopleresultsfromanestedlongitudinalcohortstudy
AT robinsonlouise hospitalisationwithoutdeliriumisnotassociatedwithcognitivedeclineinapopulationbasedsampleofolderpeopleresultsfromanestedlongitudinalcohortstudy
AT matthewsfionae hospitalisationwithoutdeliriumisnotassociatedwithcognitivedeclineinapopulationbasedsampleofolderpeopleresultsfromanestedlongitudinalcohortstudy
AT braynecarol hospitalisationwithoutdeliriumisnotassociatedwithcognitivedeclineinapopulationbasedsampleofolderpeopleresultsfromanestedlongitudinalcohortstudy
AT barneslindae hospitalisationwithoutdeliriumisnotassociatedwithcognitivedeclineinapopulationbasedsampleofolderpeopleresultsfromanestedlongitudinalcohortstudy
AT taylorjohnpaul hospitalisationwithoutdeliriumisnotassociatedwithcognitivedeclineinapopulationbasedsampleofolderpeopleresultsfromanestedlongitudinalcohortstudy
AT parkerstuartg hospitalisationwithoutdeliriumisnotassociatedwithcognitivedeclineinapopulationbasedsampleofolderpeopleresultsfromanestedlongitudinalcohortstudy
AT allanlouisem hospitalisationwithoutdeliriumisnotassociatedwithcognitivedeclineinapopulationbasedsampleofolderpeopleresultsfromanestedlongitudinalcohortstudy