Cargando…

Trends in Corticosteroid Injections for Treatment of Lateral Epicondylitis: An Analysis of 80,169 Patients

Corticosteroid (CS) injections are a frequently used treatment modality for lateral epicondylitis (LE) despite an increasing number of studies suggesting their lack of efficacy. The objective of this study was to review the annual utilization of CS injections for treatment of LE, as well as that of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sun, John Q., Stillson, Quinn A., Strelzow, Jason A., Shi, Lewis L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8437211/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34506365
http://dx.doi.org/10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-21-00186
_version_ 1783752126702288896
author Sun, John Q.
Stillson, Quinn A.
Strelzow, Jason A.
Shi, Lewis L.
author_facet Sun, John Q.
Stillson, Quinn A.
Strelzow, Jason A.
Shi, Lewis L.
author_sort Sun, John Q.
collection PubMed
description Corticosteroid (CS) injections are a frequently used treatment modality for lateral epicondylitis (LE) despite an increasing number of studies suggesting their lack of efficacy. The objective of this study was to review the annual utilization of CS injections for treatment of LE, as well as that of other nonsurgical treatments and surgical treatments, to understand how recent publications have affected the practice of physicians in treating LE. METHODS: Patients with LE from 2010 to 2017 were identified within a national insurance database and grouped by treatment modalities of CS injections, physical therapy, bracing treatment, and surgery. Epidemiologic and demographic data were reported using descriptive statistics. The number of patients receiving each treatment and the number of CS injections per patient were quantified for each year, and annual trends were analyzed using logistic regression. RESULTS: Among 80,169 qualifying patients, 16,476 received CS injections, 12,180 received physical therapy, 1,874 received bracing treatment, and 2,650 underwent surgery, with patients receiving multiple modalities being members of each respective group. We found a significant decrease in the proportion of patients with LE receiving CS injections from 23.3% in 2010 to 18.8% in 2017 (R(2) = 0.956, P < 0.001). Interestingly, the number of CS injections per patient increased during this period from 1.33 to 1.83 (R(2) = 0.843, P = 0.001). No notable changes in utilization trends for other modalities were found. DISCUSSION: Overall, our data support a decline in the use of CS injection as a treatment modality for LE from 2010 to 2017. Although correlational, this trend may reflect the increasing body of published evidence demonstrating the ineffectiveness of CS injections for the treatment of LE. In addition, the increasing number of injections per patient among those who received injections contrasts with the overall decrease in steroid utilization among all patients. Further study is needed to fully understand the mechanisms behind these trends.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8437211
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Wolters Kluwer
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84372112021-09-28 Trends in Corticosteroid Injections for Treatment of Lateral Epicondylitis: An Analysis of 80,169 Patients Sun, John Q. Stillson, Quinn A. Strelzow, Jason A. Shi, Lewis L. J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev Research Article Corticosteroid (CS) injections are a frequently used treatment modality for lateral epicondylitis (LE) despite an increasing number of studies suggesting their lack of efficacy. The objective of this study was to review the annual utilization of CS injections for treatment of LE, as well as that of other nonsurgical treatments and surgical treatments, to understand how recent publications have affected the practice of physicians in treating LE. METHODS: Patients with LE from 2010 to 2017 were identified within a national insurance database and grouped by treatment modalities of CS injections, physical therapy, bracing treatment, and surgery. Epidemiologic and demographic data were reported using descriptive statistics. The number of patients receiving each treatment and the number of CS injections per patient were quantified for each year, and annual trends were analyzed using logistic regression. RESULTS: Among 80,169 qualifying patients, 16,476 received CS injections, 12,180 received physical therapy, 1,874 received bracing treatment, and 2,650 underwent surgery, with patients receiving multiple modalities being members of each respective group. We found a significant decrease in the proportion of patients with LE receiving CS injections from 23.3% in 2010 to 18.8% in 2017 (R(2) = 0.956, P < 0.001). Interestingly, the number of CS injections per patient increased during this period from 1.33 to 1.83 (R(2) = 0.843, P = 0.001). No notable changes in utilization trends for other modalities were found. DISCUSSION: Overall, our data support a decline in the use of CS injection as a treatment modality for LE from 2010 to 2017. Although correlational, this trend may reflect the increasing body of published evidence demonstrating the ineffectiveness of CS injections for the treatment of LE. In addition, the increasing number of injections per patient among those who received injections contrasts with the overall decrease in steroid utilization among all patients. Further study is needed to fully understand the mechanisms behind these trends. Wolters Kluwer 2021-09-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8437211/ /pubmed/34506365 http://dx.doi.org/10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-21-00186 Text en Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Sun, John Q.
Stillson, Quinn A.
Strelzow, Jason A.
Shi, Lewis L.
Trends in Corticosteroid Injections for Treatment of Lateral Epicondylitis: An Analysis of 80,169 Patients
title Trends in Corticosteroid Injections for Treatment of Lateral Epicondylitis: An Analysis of 80,169 Patients
title_full Trends in Corticosteroid Injections for Treatment of Lateral Epicondylitis: An Analysis of 80,169 Patients
title_fullStr Trends in Corticosteroid Injections for Treatment of Lateral Epicondylitis: An Analysis of 80,169 Patients
title_full_unstemmed Trends in Corticosteroid Injections for Treatment of Lateral Epicondylitis: An Analysis of 80,169 Patients
title_short Trends in Corticosteroid Injections for Treatment of Lateral Epicondylitis: An Analysis of 80,169 Patients
title_sort trends in corticosteroid injections for treatment of lateral epicondylitis: an analysis of 80,169 patients
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8437211/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34506365
http://dx.doi.org/10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-21-00186
work_keys_str_mv AT sunjohnq trendsincorticosteroidinjectionsfortreatmentoflateralepicondylitisananalysisof80169patients
AT stillsonquinna trendsincorticosteroidinjectionsfortreatmentoflateralepicondylitisananalysisof80169patients
AT strelzowjasona trendsincorticosteroidinjectionsfortreatmentoflateralepicondylitisananalysisof80169patients
AT shilewisl trendsincorticosteroidinjectionsfortreatmentoflateralepicondylitisananalysisof80169patients