Cargando…
Comparison between one and two dose SARS-CoV-2 vaccine prioritization for a fixed number of vaccine doses
The swift development of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines has been met with worldwide commendation. However, in the context of an ongoing pandemic there is an interplay between infection and vaccination. While infection can grow exponentially, vaccination rates are generally limited by supply and logistics. With...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Royal Society
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8437233/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34465208 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2021.0214 |
_version_ | 1783752130707849216 |
---|---|
author | Hill, Edward M. Keeling, Matt J. |
author_facet | Hill, Edward M. Keeling, Matt J. |
author_sort | Hill, Edward M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The swift development of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines has been met with worldwide commendation. However, in the context of an ongoing pandemic there is an interplay between infection and vaccination. While infection can grow exponentially, vaccination rates are generally limited by supply and logistics. With the first SARS-CoV-2 vaccines receiving medical approval requiring two doses, there has been scrutiny on the spacing between doses; an elongated period between doses allows more of the population to receive a first vaccine dose in the short-term generating wide-spread partial immunity. Focusing on data from England, we investigated prioritization of a one dose or two dose vaccination schedule given a fixed number of vaccine doses and with respect to a measure of maximizing averted deaths. We optimized outcomes for two different estimates of population size and relative risk of mortality for at-risk groups within the Phase 1 vaccine priority order. Vaccines offering relatively high protection from the first dose favour strategies that prioritize giving more people one dose, although with increasing vaccine supply eventually those eligible and accepting vaccination will receive two doses. While optimal dose timing can substantially reduce the overall mortality risk, there needs to be careful consideration of the logistics of vaccine delivery. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8437233 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | The Royal Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84372332021-09-24 Comparison between one and two dose SARS-CoV-2 vaccine prioritization for a fixed number of vaccine doses Hill, Edward M. Keeling, Matt J. J R Soc Interface Life Sciences–Mathematics interface The swift development of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines has been met with worldwide commendation. However, in the context of an ongoing pandemic there is an interplay between infection and vaccination. While infection can grow exponentially, vaccination rates are generally limited by supply and logistics. With the first SARS-CoV-2 vaccines receiving medical approval requiring two doses, there has been scrutiny on the spacing between doses; an elongated period between doses allows more of the population to receive a first vaccine dose in the short-term generating wide-spread partial immunity. Focusing on data from England, we investigated prioritization of a one dose or two dose vaccination schedule given a fixed number of vaccine doses and with respect to a measure of maximizing averted deaths. We optimized outcomes for two different estimates of population size and relative risk of mortality for at-risk groups within the Phase 1 vaccine priority order. Vaccines offering relatively high protection from the first dose favour strategies that prioritize giving more people one dose, although with increasing vaccine supply eventually those eligible and accepting vaccination will receive two doses. While optimal dose timing can substantially reduce the overall mortality risk, there needs to be careful consideration of the logistics of vaccine delivery. The Royal Society 2021-09-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8437233/ /pubmed/34465208 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2021.0214 Text en © 2021 The Authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Life Sciences–Mathematics interface Hill, Edward M. Keeling, Matt J. Comparison between one and two dose SARS-CoV-2 vaccine prioritization for a fixed number of vaccine doses |
title | Comparison between one and two dose SARS-CoV-2 vaccine prioritization for a fixed number of vaccine doses |
title_full | Comparison between one and two dose SARS-CoV-2 vaccine prioritization for a fixed number of vaccine doses |
title_fullStr | Comparison between one and two dose SARS-CoV-2 vaccine prioritization for a fixed number of vaccine doses |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison between one and two dose SARS-CoV-2 vaccine prioritization for a fixed number of vaccine doses |
title_short | Comparison between one and two dose SARS-CoV-2 vaccine prioritization for a fixed number of vaccine doses |
title_sort | comparison between one and two dose sars-cov-2 vaccine prioritization for a fixed number of vaccine doses |
topic | Life Sciences–Mathematics interface |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8437233/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34465208 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2021.0214 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hilledwardm comparisonbetweenoneandtwodosesarscov2vaccineprioritizationforafixednumberofvaccinedoses AT keelingmattj comparisonbetweenoneandtwodosesarscov2vaccineprioritizationforafixednumberofvaccinedoses |