Cargando…

History and scientific background on the economics of abortion

BACKGROUND: Approximately one quarter of all pregnancies globally end in abortion, making it one of the most common gynecological practices worldwide. Despite the high incidence of abortion around the globe, the synthesis of known economic outcomes of abortion care and policies is lacking. Using dat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Moore, Brittany, van der Meulen Rodgers, Yana, Coast, Ernestina, Lattof, Samantha R., Poss, Cheri
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8437296/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34516575
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0257360
_version_ 1783752144078241792
author Moore, Brittany
van der Meulen Rodgers, Yana
Coast, Ernestina
Lattof, Samantha R.
Poss, Cheri
author_facet Moore, Brittany
van der Meulen Rodgers, Yana
Coast, Ernestina
Lattof, Samantha R.
Poss, Cheri
author_sort Moore, Brittany
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Approximately one quarter of all pregnancies globally end in abortion, making it one of the most common gynecological practices worldwide. Despite the high incidence of abortion around the globe, the synthesis of known economic outcomes of abortion care and policies is lacking. Using data from a systematic scoping review, we synthesized the literature on the economics of abortion at the microeconomic, mesoeconomic, and mesoeconomic levels and presented the results in a collection of studies. This article describes the history and scientific background for collection, presents the scoping review framework, and discusses the value of this knowledge base. METHODS AND FINDINGS: We conducted a scoping review using the PRISMA extension for Scoping Reviews. Studies reporting on qualitative and/or quantitative data from any world region were considered. For inclusion, studies must have examined one of the following outcomes: costs, impacts, benefits, and/or value of abortion-related care or policies. Our searches yielded 19,653 unique items, of which 365 items were included in our final inventory. Studies most often reported costs (n = 262), followed by impacts (n = 140), benefits (n = 58), and values (n = 40). Approximately one quarter (89/365) of studies contained information on the secondary outcome on stigma. Economic factors can lead to a delay in abortion care-seeking and can restrict health systems from adequately meeting the demand for abortion services. Provision of post-abortion care (PAC) services requires more resources then safe abortion services. Lack of insurance or public funding for abortion services can increase the cost of services and the overall economic impact on individuals both seeking and providing care. CONCLUSIONS: Consistent economic themes emerge from research on abortion, though evidence gaps remain that need to be addressed through more standardized methods and consideration to framing of abortion issues in economics terms. Given the highly charged political nature of abortion around the world, it is imperative that researchers continue to build the evidence base on economic outcomes of abortion services and regulations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8437296
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84372962021-09-14 History and scientific background on the economics of abortion Moore, Brittany van der Meulen Rodgers, Yana Coast, Ernestina Lattof, Samantha R. Poss, Cheri PLoS One Overview BACKGROUND: Approximately one quarter of all pregnancies globally end in abortion, making it one of the most common gynecological practices worldwide. Despite the high incidence of abortion around the globe, the synthesis of known economic outcomes of abortion care and policies is lacking. Using data from a systematic scoping review, we synthesized the literature on the economics of abortion at the microeconomic, mesoeconomic, and mesoeconomic levels and presented the results in a collection of studies. This article describes the history and scientific background for collection, presents the scoping review framework, and discusses the value of this knowledge base. METHODS AND FINDINGS: We conducted a scoping review using the PRISMA extension for Scoping Reviews. Studies reporting on qualitative and/or quantitative data from any world region were considered. For inclusion, studies must have examined one of the following outcomes: costs, impacts, benefits, and/or value of abortion-related care or policies. Our searches yielded 19,653 unique items, of which 365 items were included in our final inventory. Studies most often reported costs (n = 262), followed by impacts (n = 140), benefits (n = 58), and values (n = 40). Approximately one quarter (89/365) of studies contained information on the secondary outcome on stigma. Economic factors can lead to a delay in abortion care-seeking and can restrict health systems from adequately meeting the demand for abortion services. Provision of post-abortion care (PAC) services requires more resources then safe abortion services. Lack of insurance or public funding for abortion services can increase the cost of services and the overall economic impact on individuals both seeking and providing care. CONCLUSIONS: Consistent economic themes emerge from research on abortion, though evidence gaps remain that need to be addressed through more standardized methods and consideration to framing of abortion issues in economics terms. Given the highly charged political nature of abortion around the world, it is imperative that researchers continue to build the evidence base on economic outcomes of abortion services and regulations. Public Library of Science 2021-09-13 /pmc/articles/PMC8437296/ /pubmed/34516575 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0257360 Text en © 2021 Moore et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Overview
Moore, Brittany
van der Meulen Rodgers, Yana
Coast, Ernestina
Lattof, Samantha R.
Poss, Cheri
History and scientific background on the economics of abortion
title History and scientific background on the economics of abortion
title_full History and scientific background on the economics of abortion
title_fullStr History and scientific background on the economics of abortion
title_full_unstemmed History and scientific background on the economics of abortion
title_short History and scientific background on the economics of abortion
title_sort history and scientific background on the economics of abortion
topic Overview
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8437296/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34516575
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0257360
work_keys_str_mv AT moorebrittany historyandscientificbackgroundontheeconomicsofabortion
AT vandermeulenrodgersyana historyandscientificbackgroundontheeconomicsofabortion
AT coasternestina historyandscientificbackgroundontheeconomicsofabortion
AT lattofsamanthar historyandscientificbackgroundontheeconomicsofabortion
AT posscheri historyandscientificbackgroundontheeconomicsofabortion