Cargando…
Prevalence of the five newborn screening tests
Neonatal screening is essential for child health and has the following purposes: (1) pulse oximetry screening to evaluate congenital heart diseases; (2) red reflex examination to investigate eye diseases; (3) newborn hearing screening test to evaluate congenital hearing diseases; (4) tongue test to...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8437298/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34516590 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0257282 |
_version_ | 1783752144552198144 |
---|---|
author | Pinheiro, Josilene Maria Ferreira Flor, Taiana Brito Menêzes Marinho, Cristiane da Silva Ramos Pires, Vanessa Cristina da Costa de Oliveira, Luana Isabelly Carneiro Bezerra, Mara Rúbia de Oliveira Clementino, Jéssica Rodrigues de Andrade, Fábia Barbosa |
author_facet | Pinheiro, Josilene Maria Ferreira Flor, Taiana Brito Menêzes Marinho, Cristiane da Silva Ramos Pires, Vanessa Cristina da Costa de Oliveira, Luana Isabelly Carneiro Bezerra, Mara Rúbia de Oliveira Clementino, Jéssica Rodrigues de Andrade, Fábia Barbosa |
author_sort | Pinheiro, Josilene Maria Ferreira |
collection | PubMed |
description | Neonatal screening is essential for child health and has the following purposes: (1) pulse oximetry screening to evaluate congenital heart diseases; (2) red reflex examination to investigate eye diseases; (3) newborn hearing screening test to evaluate congenital hearing diseases; (4) tongue test to evaluate the lingual frenulum and identify communication and feeding problems; (5) the Guthrie test to screen for metabolic diseases. This study investigated the prevalence of the five neonatal screening tests and its associated institutional and socio-cultural factors using a cross-sectional study with 415 mother and baby binomials from public maternity hospitals in Natal, RN, Brazil in 2019. Pearson’s chi-squared, Mann-Whitney and Poisson regression tests were used, with a significance of p ≤ 0.05 and a 95% confidence interval. The sample loss was 71 mothers (17%). The prevalence in the first week and at the end of 28 days was 93% and 99.5% (pulse oximetry screening), 60% and 97.6% (red reflex examination), 71.9% and 93.6% (Guthrie test), 35.5% and 68.2% (hearing screening test), and 19% and 48.9% (tongue test). Only 152 newborns (36.6%) underwent all five tests. The performance of the tests was associated in the final model (p ≤ 0.05) with the residence of the mothers in the state capital (PR = 1.36; 95% CI = 1.18–1.56) and the provision of guidance for mothers about the five tests in maternity hospitals (PR = 1.30; 95% CI = 1.08–1.67). None of the tests met full coverage, and regional inequities were identified indicating the need to restructure the institutions, training and qualification procedures to improve of the work processes and longitudinal care. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8437298 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84372982021-09-14 Prevalence of the five newborn screening tests Pinheiro, Josilene Maria Ferreira Flor, Taiana Brito Menêzes Marinho, Cristiane da Silva Ramos Pires, Vanessa Cristina da Costa de Oliveira, Luana Isabelly Carneiro Bezerra, Mara Rúbia de Oliveira Clementino, Jéssica Rodrigues de Andrade, Fábia Barbosa PLoS One Research Article Neonatal screening is essential for child health and has the following purposes: (1) pulse oximetry screening to evaluate congenital heart diseases; (2) red reflex examination to investigate eye diseases; (3) newborn hearing screening test to evaluate congenital hearing diseases; (4) tongue test to evaluate the lingual frenulum and identify communication and feeding problems; (5) the Guthrie test to screen for metabolic diseases. This study investigated the prevalence of the five neonatal screening tests and its associated institutional and socio-cultural factors using a cross-sectional study with 415 mother and baby binomials from public maternity hospitals in Natal, RN, Brazil in 2019. Pearson’s chi-squared, Mann-Whitney and Poisson regression tests were used, with a significance of p ≤ 0.05 and a 95% confidence interval. The sample loss was 71 mothers (17%). The prevalence in the first week and at the end of 28 days was 93% and 99.5% (pulse oximetry screening), 60% and 97.6% (red reflex examination), 71.9% and 93.6% (Guthrie test), 35.5% and 68.2% (hearing screening test), and 19% and 48.9% (tongue test). Only 152 newborns (36.6%) underwent all five tests. The performance of the tests was associated in the final model (p ≤ 0.05) with the residence of the mothers in the state capital (PR = 1.36; 95% CI = 1.18–1.56) and the provision of guidance for mothers about the five tests in maternity hospitals (PR = 1.30; 95% CI = 1.08–1.67). None of the tests met full coverage, and regional inequities were identified indicating the need to restructure the institutions, training and qualification procedures to improve of the work processes and longitudinal care. Public Library of Science 2021-09-13 /pmc/articles/PMC8437298/ /pubmed/34516590 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0257282 Text en © 2021 Pinheiro et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Pinheiro, Josilene Maria Ferreira Flor, Taiana Brito Menêzes Marinho, Cristiane da Silva Ramos Pires, Vanessa Cristina da Costa de Oliveira, Luana Isabelly Carneiro Bezerra, Mara Rúbia de Oliveira Clementino, Jéssica Rodrigues de Andrade, Fábia Barbosa Prevalence of the five newborn screening tests |
title | Prevalence of the five newborn screening tests |
title_full | Prevalence of the five newborn screening tests |
title_fullStr | Prevalence of the five newborn screening tests |
title_full_unstemmed | Prevalence of the five newborn screening tests |
title_short | Prevalence of the five newborn screening tests |
title_sort | prevalence of the five newborn screening tests |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8437298/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34516590 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0257282 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pinheirojosilenemariaferreira prevalenceofthefivenewbornscreeningtests AT flortaianabritomenezes prevalenceofthefivenewbornscreeningtests AT marinhocristianedasilvaramos prevalenceofthefivenewbornscreeningtests AT piresvanessacristinadacosta prevalenceofthefivenewbornscreeningtests AT deoliveiraluanaisabellycarneiro prevalenceofthefivenewbornscreeningtests AT bezerramararubiadeoliveira prevalenceofthefivenewbornscreeningtests AT clementinojessicarodrigues prevalenceofthefivenewbornscreeningtests AT deandradefabiabarbosa prevalenceofthefivenewbornscreeningtests |