Cargando…

Size-specific dose estimates of adult, chest computed tomography examinations: Comparison of Chinese and updated 2017 American College of Radiology diagnostic reference levels based on the water-equivalent diameter

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to compare the volume computed tomography dose index (CTDIvol), dose length product (DLP), and size-specific dose estimate (SSDE), with the China and updated 2017 American College of Radiology (ACR) diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) in chest CT examination...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hu, Xiaoyan, Gou, Jie, Lin, Wei, Zou, Chunhua, Li, Wenbo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8437305/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34516579
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0257294
Descripción
Sumario:RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to compare the volume computed tomography dose index (CTDIvol), dose length product (DLP), and size-specific dose estimate (SSDE), with the China and updated 2017 American College of Radiology (ACR) diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) in chest CT examinations of adults based on the water-equivalent diameter (Dw). MATERIALS AND METHODS: All chest CT examinations conducted without contrast administration from January 2020 to July 2020 were retrospectively included in this study. The Dw and SSDE of all examinations were calculated automatically by “teamplay”. The CTDIvol and DLP were displayed on the DICOM-structured dose report in the console based on a 32cm phantom.The differences in patient CTDIvol, DLP, and SSDE values between groups were examined by the one-way ANOVA. The differences in patient CTDIvol, DLP, and SSDE values between the updated 2017 ACR and the China DRLs were examined with one sample t-tests. RESULTS: In total 14666 chest examinations were conducted in our study. Patients were divided into four groups based on Dw:270 (1.84%) in 15–20 cm group, 10287 (70.14%) in the 21–25 cm group, 4097 (27.94%) in the 26–30 cm group, and 12 (0.08%) patients had sizes larger than 30 cm. CTDIvol, DLP, and SSDE increased as a function of Dw (p<0.05). CTDIvol was smaller than SSDE among groups (p<0.05). The mean CTDIvol and DLP values were lower than the 25(th), 50(th), and 75(th) percentile of the China DRLs (p <0.05). The CTDIvol, DLP, and SSDE were lower than the 50(th) and 75(th) percentiles of the updated 2017 ACR DRLs (p <0.05) among groups. CONCLUSIONS: SSDE takes into account the influence of the scanning parameters, patient size, and X-ray attenuation on the radiation dose, which can give a more realistic estimate of radiation exposure dose for patients undergoing CT examinations. Establishing hospital’s own DRL according to CTDIvol and SSDE is very important even though the radiation dose is lower than the national DRLs.