Cargando…

Comparison of Microvascular Decompression and Two Isocenters Gamma Knife for the Treatment of Trigeminal Neuralgia Caused by Vertebrobasilar Dolichoectasia

Background: Vertebrobasilar dolichoectasia (VBD) is one of the rare causes of trigeminal neuralgia (TN). The common surgical treatments for patients with TN caused by VBD (VBD-TN) are microvascular decompression (MVD) and Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS). However, the therapeutic effects of the two m...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhao, Zhen, Chai, SongShan, Wang, JiaJing, Jiang, XiaoBing, Nie, ChuanSheng, Zhao, HongYang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8437393/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34526959
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2021.707985
_version_ 1783752157883793408
author Zhao, Zhen
Chai, SongShan
Wang, JiaJing
Jiang, XiaoBing
Nie, ChuanSheng
Zhao, HongYang
author_facet Zhao, Zhen
Chai, SongShan
Wang, JiaJing
Jiang, XiaoBing
Nie, ChuanSheng
Zhao, HongYang
author_sort Zhao, Zhen
collection PubMed
description Background: Vertebrobasilar dolichoectasia (VBD) is one of the rare causes of trigeminal neuralgia (TN). The common surgical treatments for patients with TN caused by VBD (VBD-TN) are microvascular decompression (MVD) and Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS). However, the therapeutic effects of the two methods have not been clinically compared, so this study was performed to evaluate the treatment outcomes of MVD and GKRS for patients with VBD-TN. Methods: The retrospective study was performed from March 2011 to March 2019 in Wuhan Union Hospital. A total of 80 patients diagnosed with VBD-TN were included in this study, and they were divided into the MVD group (n = 46) and GKRS group (n = 34) according to the surgical methods. The imaging data, intraoperative findings, treatment outcomes, and complications of the two groups were analyzed and compared. Meanwhile, the influencing factors of the treatment effect are also explored on the two groups. Results: Patients who underwent MVD were younger than patients who underwent GKRS (median ages were 61.1 and 65.4 years old, respectively, p = 0.03). The median follow-up was 61.1 months for the MVD group and 56.8 months for the GKRS group. The favorable outcomes [Barrow Neurological Institute (BNI) pain score, BNI scores I–II] occurred in 97.8% of patients treated with MVD and in 78.9% of patients treated with GKRS (p = 0.009). The favorable outcomes in the percentage of patients after MVD 1, 3, 5, and 7 years were 95.7, 85.1, 74.2, and 74.2%, respectively, whereas the corresponding percentages after GKRS were 76.5, 66.2, 56.6, and 47.2%, respectively (p = 0.031). The postoperative complications (except facial numbness) in the MVD group were higher than those in the GKRS group (p = 0.036), but the incidence of new and worsening facial numbness was lower in the GKRS group (p < 0.001). Conclusions: MVD is superior to GKRS in obtaining and maintaining favorable outcomes for patients with VBD-TN, but it also comes with more complications other than facial numbness. Thus, the treatment program can be tailored to a patient's unique condition and wishes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8437393
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84373932021-09-14 Comparison of Microvascular Decompression and Two Isocenters Gamma Knife for the Treatment of Trigeminal Neuralgia Caused by Vertebrobasilar Dolichoectasia Zhao, Zhen Chai, SongShan Wang, JiaJing Jiang, XiaoBing Nie, ChuanSheng Zhao, HongYang Front Neurol Neurology Background: Vertebrobasilar dolichoectasia (VBD) is one of the rare causes of trigeminal neuralgia (TN). The common surgical treatments for patients with TN caused by VBD (VBD-TN) are microvascular decompression (MVD) and Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS). However, the therapeutic effects of the two methods have not been clinically compared, so this study was performed to evaluate the treatment outcomes of MVD and GKRS for patients with VBD-TN. Methods: The retrospective study was performed from March 2011 to March 2019 in Wuhan Union Hospital. A total of 80 patients diagnosed with VBD-TN were included in this study, and they were divided into the MVD group (n = 46) and GKRS group (n = 34) according to the surgical methods. The imaging data, intraoperative findings, treatment outcomes, and complications of the two groups were analyzed and compared. Meanwhile, the influencing factors of the treatment effect are also explored on the two groups. Results: Patients who underwent MVD were younger than patients who underwent GKRS (median ages were 61.1 and 65.4 years old, respectively, p = 0.03). The median follow-up was 61.1 months for the MVD group and 56.8 months for the GKRS group. The favorable outcomes [Barrow Neurological Institute (BNI) pain score, BNI scores I–II] occurred in 97.8% of patients treated with MVD and in 78.9% of patients treated with GKRS (p = 0.009). The favorable outcomes in the percentage of patients after MVD 1, 3, 5, and 7 years were 95.7, 85.1, 74.2, and 74.2%, respectively, whereas the corresponding percentages after GKRS were 76.5, 66.2, 56.6, and 47.2%, respectively (p = 0.031). The postoperative complications (except facial numbness) in the MVD group were higher than those in the GKRS group (p = 0.036), but the incidence of new and worsening facial numbness was lower in the GKRS group (p < 0.001). Conclusions: MVD is superior to GKRS in obtaining and maintaining favorable outcomes for patients with VBD-TN, but it also comes with more complications other than facial numbness. Thus, the treatment program can be tailored to a patient's unique condition and wishes. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-08-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8437393/ /pubmed/34526959 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2021.707985 Text en Copyright © 2021 Zhao, Chai, Wang, Jiang, Nie and Zhao. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neurology
Zhao, Zhen
Chai, SongShan
Wang, JiaJing
Jiang, XiaoBing
Nie, ChuanSheng
Zhao, HongYang
Comparison of Microvascular Decompression and Two Isocenters Gamma Knife for the Treatment of Trigeminal Neuralgia Caused by Vertebrobasilar Dolichoectasia
title Comparison of Microvascular Decompression and Two Isocenters Gamma Knife for the Treatment of Trigeminal Neuralgia Caused by Vertebrobasilar Dolichoectasia
title_full Comparison of Microvascular Decompression and Two Isocenters Gamma Knife for the Treatment of Trigeminal Neuralgia Caused by Vertebrobasilar Dolichoectasia
title_fullStr Comparison of Microvascular Decompression and Two Isocenters Gamma Knife for the Treatment of Trigeminal Neuralgia Caused by Vertebrobasilar Dolichoectasia
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Microvascular Decompression and Two Isocenters Gamma Knife for the Treatment of Trigeminal Neuralgia Caused by Vertebrobasilar Dolichoectasia
title_short Comparison of Microvascular Decompression and Two Isocenters Gamma Knife for the Treatment of Trigeminal Neuralgia Caused by Vertebrobasilar Dolichoectasia
title_sort comparison of microvascular decompression and two isocenters gamma knife for the treatment of trigeminal neuralgia caused by vertebrobasilar dolichoectasia
topic Neurology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8437393/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34526959
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2021.707985
work_keys_str_mv AT zhaozhen comparisonofmicrovasculardecompressionandtwoisocentersgammaknifeforthetreatmentoftrigeminalneuralgiacausedbyvertebrobasilardolichoectasia
AT chaisongshan comparisonofmicrovasculardecompressionandtwoisocentersgammaknifeforthetreatmentoftrigeminalneuralgiacausedbyvertebrobasilardolichoectasia
AT wangjiajing comparisonofmicrovasculardecompressionandtwoisocentersgammaknifeforthetreatmentoftrigeminalneuralgiacausedbyvertebrobasilardolichoectasia
AT jiangxiaobing comparisonofmicrovasculardecompressionandtwoisocentersgammaknifeforthetreatmentoftrigeminalneuralgiacausedbyvertebrobasilardolichoectasia
AT niechuansheng comparisonofmicrovasculardecompressionandtwoisocentersgammaknifeforthetreatmentoftrigeminalneuralgiacausedbyvertebrobasilardolichoectasia
AT zhaohongyang comparisonofmicrovasculardecompressionandtwoisocentersgammaknifeforthetreatmentoftrigeminalneuralgiacausedbyvertebrobasilardolichoectasia