Cargando…
A Scoping Review of the Conceptual Differentiation of Technology for Healthy Aging
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: With the emergence of healthy aging as a key societal issue in recent decades, technology has often been proposed as a solution to the challenges faced by aging societies. From a public health perspective, however, aging-related technologies have been inconsistently concep...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8437509/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32725147 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnaa051 |
_version_ | 1783752176880844800 |
---|---|
author | Kim, Hansuk Kelly, Sarah Lafortune, Louise Brayne, Carol |
author_facet | Kim, Hansuk Kelly, Sarah Lafortune, Louise Brayne, Carol |
author_sort | Kim, Hansuk |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: With the emergence of healthy aging as a key societal issue in recent decades, technology has often been proposed as a solution to the challenges faced by aging societies. From a public health perspective, however, aging-related technologies have been inconsistently conceptualized and ill-defined. By examining how relevant concepts in “technology for aging” have been developed to date, we hope to identify gaps and begin clarifying the topic. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We conducted a scoping review according to PRISMA-ScR, drawing on PubMed and Embase. We selected articles that directly reported concepts of technology for aging, or from which such concepts could be inferred. RESULTS: We identified 43 articles, most of which were narrative reviews (n = 31). Concepts of technology for aging were presented in diverse ways with some overlap. Most studies provided some terminology (n = 36), but with little conceptual uniformity. Conceptual discourse was often focused on the aging agenda; while technological aspects were poorly defined. A conceptual framework from a public health perspective was derived from 8 articles—it showed that technology strategies do not take a population approach. DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS: While the potential of “technology for aging” is vast, its real capacity to deliver a desirable life for older people remains underdeveloped. Clearer concepts and realistic goals at population level are lacking. Efficient investment must be made throughout the social system, and technology needs to be integrated via macro-level practices. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8437509 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84375092021-09-14 A Scoping Review of the Conceptual Differentiation of Technology for Healthy Aging Kim, Hansuk Kelly, Sarah Lafortune, Louise Brayne, Carol Gerontologist Review Articles BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: With the emergence of healthy aging as a key societal issue in recent decades, technology has often been proposed as a solution to the challenges faced by aging societies. From a public health perspective, however, aging-related technologies have been inconsistently conceptualized and ill-defined. By examining how relevant concepts in “technology for aging” have been developed to date, we hope to identify gaps and begin clarifying the topic. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We conducted a scoping review according to PRISMA-ScR, drawing on PubMed and Embase. We selected articles that directly reported concepts of technology for aging, or from which such concepts could be inferred. RESULTS: We identified 43 articles, most of which were narrative reviews (n = 31). Concepts of technology for aging were presented in diverse ways with some overlap. Most studies provided some terminology (n = 36), but with little conceptual uniformity. Conceptual discourse was often focused on the aging agenda; while technological aspects were poorly defined. A conceptual framework from a public health perspective was derived from 8 articles—it showed that technology strategies do not take a population approach. DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS: While the potential of “technology for aging” is vast, its real capacity to deliver a desirable life for older people remains underdeveloped. Clearer concepts and realistic goals at population level are lacking. Efficient investment must be made throughout the social system, and technology needs to be integrated via macro-level practices. Oxford University Press 2021-07-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8437509/ /pubmed/32725147 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnaa051 Text en © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Gerontological Society of America. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Articles Kim, Hansuk Kelly, Sarah Lafortune, Louise Brayne, Carol A Scoping Review of the Conceptual Differentiation of Technology for Healthy Aging |
title | A Scoping Review of the Conceptual Differentiation of Technology for Healthy Aging |
title_full | A Scoping Review of the Conceptual Differentiation of Technology for Healthy Aging |
title_fullStr | A Scoping Review of the Conceptual Differentiation of Technology for Healthy Aging |
title_full_unstemmed | A Scoping Review of the Conceptual Differentiation of Technology for Healthy Aging |
title_short | A Scoping Review of the Conceptual Differentiation of Technology for Healthy Aging |
title_sort | scoping review of the conceptual differentiation of technology for healthy aging |
topic | Review Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8437509/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32725147 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnaa051 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kimhansuk ascopingreviewoftheconceptualdifferentiationoftechnologyforhealthyaging AT kellysarah ascopingreviewoftheconceptualdifferentiationoftechnologyforhealthyaging AT lafortunelouise ascopingreviewoftheconceptualdifferentiationoftechnologyforhealthyaging AT braynecarol ascopingreviewoftheconceptualdifferentiationoftechnologyforhealthyaging AT kimhansuk scopingreviewoftheconceptualdifferentiationoftechnologyforhealthyaging AT kellysarah scopingreviewoftheconceptualdifferentiationoftechnologyforhealthyaging AT lafortunelouise scopingreviewoftheconceptualdifferentiationoftechnologyforhealthyaging AT braynecarol scopingreviewoftheconceptualdifferentiationoftechnologyforhealthyaging |