Cargando…

A Scoping Review of the Conceptual Differentiation of Technology for Healthy Aging

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: With the emergence of healthy aging as a key societal issue in recent decades, technology has often been proposed as a solution to the challenges faced by aging societies. From a public health perspective, however, aging-related technologies have been inconsistently concep...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Hansuk, Kelly, Sarah, Lafortune, Louise, Brayne, Carol
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8437509/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32725147
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnaa051
_version_ 1783752176880844800
author Kim, Hansuk
Kelly, Sarah
Lafortune, Louise
Brayne, Carol
author_facet Kim, Hansuk
Kelly, Sarah
Lafortune, Louise
Brayne, Carol
author_sort Kim, Hansuk
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: With the emergence of healthy aging as a key societal issue in recent decades, technology has often been proposed as a solution to the challenges faced by aging societies. From a public health perspective, however, aging-related technologies have been inconsistently conceptualized and ill-defined. By examining how relevant concepts in “technology for aging” have been developed to date, we hope to identify gaps and begin clarifying the topic. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We conducted a scoping review according to PRISMA-ScR, drawing on PubMed and Embase. We selected articles that directly reported concepts of technology for aging, or from which such concepts could be inferred. RESULTS: We identified 43 articles, most of which were narrative reviews (n = 31). Concepts of technology for aging were presented in diverse ways with some overlap. Most studies provided some terminology (n = 36), but with little conceptual uniformity. Conceptual discourse was often focused on the aging agenda; while technological aspects were poorly defined. A conceptual framework from a public health perspective was derived from 8 articles—it showed that technology strategies do not take a population approach. DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS: While the potential of “technology for aging” is vast, its real capacity to deliver a desirable life for older people remains underdeveloped. Clearer concepts and realistic goals at population level are lacking. Efficient investment must be made throughout the social system, and technology needs to be integrated via macro-level practices.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8437509
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84375092021-09-14 A Scoping Review of the Conceptual Differentiation of Technology for Healthy Aging Kim, Hansuk Kelly, Sarah Lafortune, Louise Brayne, Carol Gerontologist Review Articles BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: With the emergence of healthy aging as a key societal issue in recent decades, technology has often been proposed as a solution to the challenges faced by aging societies. From a public health perspective, however, aging-related technologies have been inconsistently conceptualized and ill-defined. By examining how relevant concepts in “technology for aging” have been developed to date, we hope to identify gaps and begin clarifying the topic. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We conducted a scoping review according to PRISMA-ScR, drawing on PubMed and Embase. We selected articles that directly reported concepts of technology for aging, or from which such concepts could be inferred. RESULTS: We identified 43 articles, most of which were narrative reviews (n = 31). Concepts of technology for aging were presented in diverse ways with some overlap. Most studies provided some terminology (n = 36), but with little conceptual uniformity. Conceptual discourse was often focused on the aging agenda; while technological aspects were poorly defined. A conceptual framework from a public health perspective was derived from 8 articles—it showed that technology strategies do not take a population approach. DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS: While the potential of “technology for aging” is vast, its real capacity to deliver a desirable life for older people remains underdeveloped. Clearer concepts and realistic goals at population level are lacking. Efficient investment must be made throughout the social system, and technology needs to be integrated via macro-level practices. Oxford University Press 2021-07-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8437509/ /pubmed/32725147 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnaa051 Text en © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Gerontological Society of America. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Articles
Kim, Hansuk
Kelly, Sarah
Lafortune, Louise
Brayne, Carol
A Scoping Review of the Conceptual Differentiation of Technology for Healthy Aging
title A Scoping Review of the Conceptual Differentiation of Technology for Healthy Aging
title_full A Scoping Review of the Conceptual Differentiation of Technology for Healthy Aging
title_fullStr A Scoping Review of the Conceptual Differentiation of Technology for Healthy Aging
title_full_unstemmed A Scoping Review of the Conceptual Differentiation of Technology for Healthy Aging
title_short A Scoping Review of the Conceptual Differentiation of Technology for Healthy Aging
title_sort scoping review of the conceptual differentiation of technology for healthy aging
topic Review Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8437509/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32725147
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnaa051
work_keys_str_mv AT kimhansuk ascopingreviewoftheconceptualdifferentiationoftechnologyforhealthyaging
AT kellysarah ascopingreviewoftheconceptualdifferentiationoftechnologyforhealthyaging
AT lafortunelouise ascopingreviewoftheconceptualdifferentiationoftechnologyforhealthyaging
AT braynecarol ascopingreviewoftheconceptualdifferentiationoftechnologyforhealthyaging
AT kimhansuk scopingreviewoftheconceptualdifferentiationoftechnologyforhealthyaging
AT kellysarah scopingreviewoftheconceptualdifferentiationoftechnologyforhealthyaging
AT lafortunelouise scopingreviewoftheconceptualdifferentiationoftechnologyforhealthyaging
AT braynecarol scopingreviewoftheconceptualdifferentiationoftechnologyforhealthyaging