Cargando…
RSA, TSA and PyC hemi-prostheses: comparing indications and clinical outcomes using a second-generation modular short-stem shoulder prosthesis
INTRODUCTION: The goal of this study was to provide an insight into the clinical results after modular short-stem shoulder arthroplasty for various indications. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A consecutive cohort study of 76 patients followed up for 23–55 (mean 31.4) months. 23 anatomical (TSA), 32 reverse...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8437863/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33025070 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00402-020-03529-w |
_version_ | 1783752245227028480 |
---|---|
author | Kleim, Benjamin D. Garving, Christina Brunner, Ulrich H. |
author_facet | Kleim, Benjamin D. Garving, Christina Brunner, Ulrich H. |
author_sort | Kleim, Benjamin D. |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: The goal of this study was to provide an insight into the clinical results after modular short-stem shoulder arthroplasty for various indications. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A consecutive cohort study of 76 patients followed up for 23–55 (mean 31.4) months. 23 anatomical (TSA), 32 reverse (RSA) and 21 hemi-prostheses with a pyrocarbon head (PyC), using a modular short stem with proximal porous coating were implanted. Range of motion, pain and Constant score (CS) were recorded. Comparisons of pre- vs postoperative outcomes, between prosthesis types and indications, were made. RESULTS: All prosthesis types brought about a significant improvement (p < 0.05) in all measured outcomes. TSA had a significantly higher increase in the CS than PyC and RSA (p = 0.002 and 0.003, respectively). TSA produced superior gains in all ROM compared with RSA (p < 0.02). RSA brought about significantly smaller improvements in internal rotation than TSA and PyC (p = 0.0001 and 0.008, respectively). TSA had greater pain relief than PyC (p = 0.02). TSA with Walch A glenoids seemed to improve more than type B in the CS. PyC patients with Walch B glenoids improved more than Walch A (p = 0.03). When implanted due to Osteoarthritis (OA), PyC had a comparable final outcome to TSA (p = 0.95), although the preoperatively worse TSA patients had a greater improvement in the CS (p = 0.026). The outcome of RSA did not differ between indications, but Walch A glenoids tended to improve more. CONCLUSIONS: Using a second-generation short-stem shoulder prostheses, TSA achieves the best clinical improvements overall, especially for OA with a Walch A glenoid. Despite refixation of the subscapularis tendon in all cases, RSA has inferior internal rotation than TSA and PyC, suggesting a mechanical limitation. OA, a Walch B glenoid and arthritis caused by instability seem to be ideal indications when considering PyC. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8437863 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84378632021-09-29 RSA, TSA and PyC hemi-prostheses: comparing indications and clinical outcomes using a second-generation modular short-stem shoulder prosthesis Kleim, Benjamin D. Garving, Christina Brunner, Ulrich H. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg Orthopaedic Surgery INTRODUCTION: The goal of this study was to provide an insight into the clinical results after modular short-stem shoulder arthroplasty for various indications. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A consecutive cohort study of 76 patients followed up for 23–55 (mean 31.4) months. 23 anatomical (TSA), 32 reverse (RSA) and 21 hemi-prostheses with a pyrocarbon head (PyC), using a modular short stem with proximal porous coating were implanted. Range of motion, pain and Constant score (CS) were recorded. Comparisons of pre- vs postoperative outcomes, between prosthesis types and indications, were made. RESULTS: All prosthesis types brought about a significant improvement (p < 0.05) in all measured outcomes. TSA had a significantly higher increase in the CS than PyC and RSA (p = 0.002 and 0.003, respectively). TSA produced superior gains in all ROM compared with RSA (p < 0.02). RSA brought about significantly smaller improvements in internal rotation than TSA and PyC (p = 0.0001 and 0.008, respectively). TSA had greater pain relief than PyC (p = 0.02). TSA with Walch A glenoids seemed to improve more than type B in the CS. PyC patients with Walch B glenoids improved more than Walch A (p = 0.03). When implanted due to Osteoarthritis (OA), PyC had a comparable final outcome to TSA (p = 0.95), although the preoperatively worse TSA patients had a greater improvement in the CS (p = 0.026). The outcome of RSA did not differ between indications, but Walch A glenoids tended to improve more. CONCLUSIONS: Using a second-generation short-stem shoulder prostheses, TSA achieves the best clinical improvements overall, especially for OA with a Walch A glenoid. Despite refixation of the subscapularis tendon in all cases, RSA has inferior internal rotation than TSA and PyC, suggesting a mechanical limitation. OA, a Walch B glenoid and arthritis caused by instability seem to be ideal indications when considering PyC. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-10-06 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8437863/ /pubmed/33025070 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00402-020-03529-w Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Orthopaedic Surgery Kleim, Benjamin D. Garving, Christina Brunner, Ulrich H. RSA, TSA and PyC hemi-prostheses: comparing indications and clinical outcomes using a second-generation modular short-stem shoulder prosthesis |
title | RSA, TSA and PyC hemi-prostheses: comparing indications and clinical outcomes using a second-generation modular short-stem shoulder prosthesis |
title_full | RSA, TSA and PyC hemi-prostheses: comparing indications and clinical outcomes using a second-generation modular short-stem shoulder prosthesis |
title_fullStr | RSA, TSA and PyC hemi-prostheses: comparing indications and clinical outcomes using a second-generation modular short-stem shoulder prosthesis |
title_full_unstemmed | RSA, TSA and PyC hemi-prostheses: comparing indications and clinical outcomes using a second-generation modular short-stem shoulder prosthesis |
title_short | RSA, TSA and PyC hemi-prostheses: comparing indications and clinical outcomes using a second-generation modular short-stem shoulder prosthesis |
title_sort | rsa, tsa and pyc hemi-prostheses: comparing indications and clinical outcomes using a second-generation modular short-stem shoulder prosthesis |
topic | Orthopaedic Surgery |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8437863/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33025070 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00402-020-03529-w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kleimbenjamind rsatsaandpychemiprosthesescomparingindicationsandclinicaloutcomesusingasecondgenerationmodularshortstemshoulderprosthesis AT garvingchristina rsatsaandpychemiprosthesescomparingindicationsandclinicaloutcomesusingasecondgenerationmodularshortstemshoulderprosthesis AT brunnerulrichh rsatsaandpychemiprosthesescomparingindicationsandclinicaloutcomesusingasecondgenerationmodularshortstemshoulderprosthesis |