Cargando…

Description of the updated nutrition calculation of the Oxford WebQ questionnaire and comparison with the previous version among 207,144 participants in UK Biobank

PURPOSE: The Oxford WebQ is a web-based 24-h dietary assessment method which has been used in UK Biobank and other large prospective studies. The food composition table used to calculate nutrient intakes has recently been replaced with the UK Nutrient Databank, which has food composition data closer...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Perez-Cornago, Aurora, Pollard, Zoe, Young, Heather, van Uden, Marloes, Andrews, Colm, Piernas, Carmen, Key, Timothy J., Mulligan, Angela, Lentjes, Marleen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8437868/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33956230
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00394-021-02558-4
_version_ 1783752246396190720
author Perez-Cornago, Aurora
Pollard, Zoe
Young, Heather
van Uden, Marloes
Andrews, Colm
Piernas, Carmen
Key, Timothy J.
Mulligan, Angela
Lentjes, Marleen
author_facet Perez-Cornago, Aurora
Pollard, Zoe
Young, Heather
van Uden, Marloes
Andrews, Colm
Piernas, Carmen
Key, Timothy J.
Mulligan, Angela
Lentjes, Marleen
author_sort Perez-Cornago, Aurora
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The Oxford WebQ is a web-based 24-h dietary assessment method which has been used in UK Biobank and other large prospective studies. The food composition table used to calculate nutrient intakes has recently been replaced with the UK Nutrient Databank, which has food composition data closer in time to when participants completed the questionnaire, and new dietary variables were incorporated. Here we describe the updated version of the Oxford WebQ questionnaire nutrient calculation, and compare nutrient intakes with the previous version used. METHODS: 207,144 UK Biobank participants completed ≥ 1 Oxford WebQs, and means and standard deviations of nutrient intakes were averaged for all completed 24-h dietary assessments. Spearman correlations and weighted kappa statistics were used to compare the re-classification and agreement of nutrient intakes between the two versions. RESULTS: 35 new nutrients were incorporated in the updated version. Compared to the previous version, most nutrients were very similar in the updated version except for a few nutrients which showed a difference of > 10%: lower with the new version for trans-fat (− 20%), and vitamin C (− 15%), but higher for retinol (+ 42%), vitamin D (+ 26%) and vitamin E (+ 20%). Most participants were in the same (> 60%) or adjacent (> 90%) quintile of intake for the two versions. Except for trans-fat (r = 0.58, κ = 0.42), very high correlations were found between the nutrients calculated using the two versions (r > 0.79 and κ > 0.60). CONCLUSION: Small absolute differences in nutrient intakes were observed between the two versions, and the ranking of individuals was minimally affected, except for trans-fat. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00394-021-02558-4.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8437868
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84378682021-09-29 Description of the updated nutrition calculation of the Oxford WebQ questionnaire and comparison with the previous version among 207,144 participants in UK Biobank Perez-Cornago, Aurora Pollard, Zoe Young, Heather van Uden, Marloes Andrews, Colm Piernas, Carmen Key, Timothy J. Mulligan, Angela Lentjes, Marleen Eur J Nutr Original Contribution PURPOSE: The Oxford WebQ is a web-based 24-h dietary assessment method which has been used in UK Biobank and other large prospective studies. The food composition table used to calculate nutrient intakes has recently been replaced with the UK Nutrient Databank, which has food composition data closer in time to when participants completed the questionnaire, and new dietary variables were incorporated. Here we describe the updated version of the Oxford WebQ questionnaire nutrient calculation, and compare nutrient intakes with the previous version used. METHODS: 207,144 UK Biobank participants completed ≥ 1 Oxford WebQs, and means and standard deviations of nutrient intakes were averaged for all completed 24-h dietary assessments. Spearman correlations and weighted kappa statistics were used to compare the re-classification and agreement of nutrient intakes between the two versions. RESULTS: 35 new nutrients were incorporated in the updated version. Compared to the previous version, most nutrients were very similar in the updated version except for a few nutrients which showed a difference of > 10%: lower with the new version for trans-fat (− 20%), and vitamin C (− 15%), but higher for retinol (+ 42%), vitamin D (+ 26%) and vitamin E (+ 20%). Most participants were in the same (> 60%) or adjacent (> 90%) quintile of intake for the two versions. Except for trans-fat (r = 0.58, κ = 0.42), very high correlations were found between the nutrients calculated using the two versions (r > 0.79 and κ > 0.60). CONCLUSION: Small absolute differences in nutrient intakes were observed between the two versions, and the ranking of individuals was minimally affected, except for trans-fat. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00394-021-02558-4. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-05-06 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8437868/ /pubmed/33956230 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00394-021-02558-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Contribution
Perez-Cornago, Aurora
Pollard, Zoe
Young, Heather
van Uden, Marloes
Andrews, Colm
Piernas, Carmen
Key, Timothy J.
Mulligan, Angela
Lentjes, Marleen
Description of the updated nutrition calculation of the Oxford WebQ questionnaire and comparison with the previous version among 207,144 participants in UK Biobank
title Description of the updated nutrition calculation of the Oxford WebQ questionnaire and comparison with the previous version among 207,144 participants in UK Biobank
title_full Description of the updated nutrition calculation of the Oxford WebQ questionnaire and comparison with the previous version among 207,144 participants in UK Biobank
title_fullStr Description of the updated nutrition calculation of the Oxford WebQ questionnaire and comparison with the previous version among 207,144 participants in UK Biobank
title_full_unstemmed Description of the updated nutrition calculation of the Oxford WebQ questionnaire and comparison with the previous version among 207,144 participants in UK Biobank
title_short Description of the updated nutrition calculation of the Oxford WebQ questionnaire and comparison with the previous version among 207,144 participants in UK Biobank
title_sort description of the updated nutrition calculation of the oxford webq questionnaire and comparison with the previous version among 207,144 participants in uk biobank
topic Original Contribution
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8437868/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33956230
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00394-021-02558-4
work_keys_str_mv AT perezcornagoaurora descriptionoftheupdatednutritioncalculationoftheoxfordwebqquestionnaireandcomparisonwiththepreviousversionamong207144participantsinukbiobank
AT pollardzoe descriptionoftheupdatednutritioncalculationoftheoxfordwebqquestionnaireandcomparisonwiththepreviousversionamong207144participantsinukbiobank
AT youngheather descriptionoftheupdatednutritioncalculationoftheoxfordwebqquestionnaireandcomparisonwiththepreviousversionamong207144participantsinukbiobank
AT vanudenmarloes descriptionoftheupdatednutritioncalculationoftheoxfordwebqquestionnaireandcomparisonwiththepreviousversionamong207144participantsinukbiobank
AT andrewscolm descriptionoftheupdatednutritioncalculationoftheoxfordwebqquestionnaireandcomparisonwiththepreviousversionamong207144participantsinukbiobank
AT piernascarmen descriptionoftheupdatednutritioncalculationoftheoxfordwebqquestionnaireandcomparisonwiththepreviousversionamong207144participantsinukbiobank
AT keytimothyj descriptionoftheupdatednutritioncalculationoftheoxfordwebqquestionnaireandcomparisonwiththepreviousversionamong207144participantsinukbiobank
AT mulliganangela descriptionoftheupdatednutritioncalculationoftheoxfordwebqquestionnaireandcomparisonwiththepreviousversionamong207144participantsinukbiobank
AT lentjesmarleen descriptionoftheupdatednutritioncalculationoftheoxfordwebqquestionnaireandcomparisonwiththepreviousversionamong207144participantsinukbiobank