Cargando…
IMproving Preclinical Assessment of Cardioprotective Therapies (IMPACT) criteria: guidelines of the EU-CARDIOPROTECTION COST Action
Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and the heart failure (HF) which may follow are among the leading causes of death and disability worldwide. As such, new therapeutic interventions are still needed to protect the heart against acute ischemia/reperfusion injury to reduce myocardial infarct size and p...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8437922/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34515837 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00395-021-00893-5 |
_version_ | 1783752258288091136 |
---|---|
author | Lecour, Sandrine Andreadou, Ioanna Bøtker, Hans Erik Davidson, Sean M. Heusch, Gerd Ruiz-Meana, Marisol Schulz, Rainer Zuurbier, Coert J. Ferdinandy, Péter Hausenloy, Derek J. |
author_facet | Lecour, Sandrine Andreadou, Ioanna Bøtker, Hans Erik Davidson, Sean M. Heusch, Gerd Ruiz-Meana, Marisol Schulz, Rainer Zuurbier, Coert J. Ferdinandy, Péter Hausenloy, Derek J. |
author_sort | Lecour, Sandrine |
collection | PubMed |
description | Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and the heart failure (HF) which may follow are among the leading causes of death and disability worldwide. As such, new therapeutic interventions are still needed to protect the heart against acute ischemia/reperfusion injury to reduce myocardial infarct size and prevent the onset of HF in patients presenting with AMI. However, the clinical translation of cardioprotective interventions that have proven to be beneficial in preclinical animal studies, has been challenging. One likely major reason for this failure to translate cardioprotection into patient benefit is the lack of rigorous and systematic in vivo preclinical assessment of the efficacy of promising cardioprotective interventions prior to their clinical evaluation. To address this, we propose an in vivo set of step-by-step criteria for IMproving Preclinical Assessment of Cardioprotective Therapies (‘IMPACT’), for investigators to consider adopting before embarking on clinical studies, the aim of which is to improve the likelihood of translating novel cardioprotective interventions into the clinical setting for patient benefit. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8437922 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84379222021-09-29 IMproving Preclinical Assessment of Cardioprotective Therapies (IMPACT) criteria: guidelines of the EU-CARDIOPROTECTION COST Action Lecour, Sandrine Andreadou, Ioanna Bøtker, Hans Erik Davidson, Sean M. Heusch, Gerd Ruiz-Meana, Marisol Schulz, Rainer Zuurbier, Coert J. Ferdinandy, Péter Hausenloy, Derek J. Basic Res Cardiol Practical Guideline Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and the heart failure (HF) which may follow are among the leading causes of death and disability worldwide. As such, new therapeutic interventions are still needed to protect the heart against acute ischemia/reperfusion injury to reduce myocardial infarct size and prevent the onset of HF in patients presenting with AMI. However, the clinical translation of cardioprotective interventions that have proven to be beneficial in preclinical animal studies, has been challenging. One likely major reason for this failure to translate cardioprotection into patient benefit is the lack of rigorous and systematic in vivo preclinical assessment of the efficacy of promising cardioprotective interventions prior to their clinical evaluation. To address this, we propose an in vivo set of step-by-step criteria for IMproving Preclinical Assessment of Cardioprotective Therapies (‘IMPACT’), for investigators to consider adopting before embarking on clinical studies, the aim of which is to improve the likelihood of translating novel cardioprotective interventions into the clinical setting for patient benefit. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-09-13 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8437922/ /pubmed/34515837 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00395-021-00893-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Practical Guideline Lecour, Sandrine Andreadou, Ioanna Bøtker, Hans Erik Davidson, Sean M. Heusch, Gerd Ruiz-Meana, Marisol Schulz, Rainer Zuurbier, Coert J. Ferdinandy, Péter Hausenloy, Derek J. IMproving Preclinical Assessment of Cardioprotective Therapies (IMPACT) criteria: guidelines of the EU-CARDIOPROTECTION COST Action |
title | IMproving Preclinical Assessment of Cardioprotective Therapies (IMPACT) criteria: guidelines of the EU-CARDIOPROTECTION COST Action |
title_full | IMproving Preclinical Assessment of Cardioprotective Therapies (IMPACT) criteria: guidelines of the EU-CARDIOPROTECTION COST Action |
title_fullStr | IMproving Preclinical Assessment of Cardioprotective Therapies (IMPACT) criteria: guidelines of the EU-CARDIOPROTECTION COST Action |
title_full_unstemmed | IMproving Preclinical Assessment of Cardioprotective Therapies (IMPACT) criteria: guidelines of the EU-CARDIOPROTECTION COST Action |
title_short | IMproving Preclinical Assessment of Cardioprotective Therapies (IMPACT) criteria: guidelines of the EU-CARDIOPROTECTION COST Action |
title_sort | improving preclinical assessment of cardioprotective therapies (impact) criteria: guidelines of the eu-cardioprotection cost action |
topic | Practical Guideline |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8437922/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34515837 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00395-021-00893-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lecoursandrine improvingpreclinicalassessmentofcardioprotectivetherapiesimpactcriteriaguidelinesoftheeucardioprotectioncostaction AT andreadouioanna improvingpreclinicalassessmentofcardioprotectivetherapiesimpactcriteriaguidelinesoftheeucardioprotectioncostaction AT bøtkerhanserik improvingpreclinicalassessmentofcardioprotectivetherapiesimpactcriteriaguidelinesoftheeucardioprotectioncostaction AT davidsonseanm improvingpreclinicalassessmentofcardioprotectivetherapiesimpactcriteriaguidelinesoftheeucardioprotectioncostaction AT heuschgerd improvingpreclinicalassessmentofcardioprotectivetherapiesimpactcriteriaguidelinesoftheeucardioprotectioncostaction AT ruizmeanamarisol improvingpreclinicalassessmentofcardioprotectivetherapiesimpactcriteriaguidelinesoftheeucardioprotectioncostaction AT schulzrainer improvingpreclinicalassessmentofcardioprotectivetherapiesimpactcriteriaguidelinesoftheeucardioprotectioncostaction AT zuurbiercoertj improvingpreclinicalassessmentofcardioprotectivetherapiesimpactcriteriaguidelinesoftheeucardioprotectioncostaction AT ferdinandypeter improvingpreclinicalassessmentofcardioprotectivetherapiesimpactcriteriaguidelinesoftheeucardioprotectioncostaction AT hausenloyderekj improvingpreclinicalassessmentofcardioprotectivetherapiesimpactcriteriaguidelinesoftheeucardioprotectioncostaction AT improvingpreclinicalassessmentofcardioprotectivetherapiesimpactcriteriaguidelinesoftheeucardioprotectioncostaction |