Cargando…

Is Targeting Nerve Growth Factor Antagonist a New Option for Pharmacologic Treatment of Low Back Pain? A Supplemental Network Meta-Analysis of the American College of Physicians Guidelines

Objective: It has been found that targeting nerve growth factor antagonists (ANGF) have excellent effects in the treatment of chronic pain, and the current pharmacologic treatments have very limited effects on low back pain (LBP). Thus we conducted this network meta-analysis (NMA) to study the effic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cao, Ziqin, Li, Qiangxiang, Guo, Jia, Li, Yajia, Wu, Jianhuang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8438173/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34531752
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2021.727771
_version_ 1783752312682971136
author Cao, Ziqin
Li, Qiangxiang
Guo, Jia
Li, Yajia
Wu, Jianhuang
author_facet Cao, Ziqin
Li, Qiangxiang
Guo, Jia
Li, Yajia
Wu, Jianhuang
author_sort Cao, Ziqin
collection PubMed
description Objective: It has been found that targeting nerve growth factor antagonists (ANGF) have excellent effects in the treatment of chronic pain, and the current pharmacologic treatments have very limited effects on low back pain (LBP). Thus we conducted this network meta-analysis (NMA) to study the efficacy and safety of ANGF for the treatment of LBP, and to guide for clinical practice and further research. Method: PubMed, Scopus, Embase, CNKI, and the Cochrane Library were searched from January 1980 to March 2021. A frequentist framework network meta-analysis with a random-effect model was performed. Ranking effects were calculated by surface under the cumulative ranking analysis (SUCRA) and clusterank analysis. Results: This NMA identified 30 studies, involving 9,508 patients with LBP. ANGF reported both superior effect on pain relief {SUCRA 82.1%, SMD 0.89, 95% CI [(0.26,1.51)]} and function improvement {SUCRA 77.3%, SMD 0.93, 95% CI [(0.27,1.58)]} than placebo, and did not showed any higher risk of treatment-emergent adverse effects {RR 1.11, 95% CI [(0.97,1.27)]} or serious adverse effects {RR 1.03, 95% CI [(0.54,1.97)]}, but it was associate with a special risk of rapidly progressive osteoarthritis. ANGF displayed the greatest potential to be the most effective and safest treatment (cluster-rank value for function improvement and safety: 4266.96, for pain relief and safety: 4531.92). Conclusion: ANGF could relieve pain and improve function effectively and are superior to other traditional drugs recommended by guidelines. Although no significant difference in tolerability and safety between ANGFs and placebo was found, the rapid progression of original osteoarthritis which may be related to the use of ANGFs still needs special attention and furtherly verification by clinical trials. Systematic Review Registration: PROSPERO, identifier [CRD42021258033].
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8438173
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84381732021-09-15 Is Targeting Nerve Growth Factor Antagonist a New Option for Pharmacologic Treatment of Low Back Pain? A Supplemental Network Meta-Analysis of the American College of Physicians Guidelines Cao, Ziqin Li, Qiangxiang Guo, Jia Li, Yajia Wu, Jianhuang Front Pharmacol Pharmacology Objective: It has been found that targeting nerve growth factor antagonists (ANGF) have excellent effects in the treatment of chronic pain, and the current pharmacologic treatments have very limited effects on low back pain (LBP). Thus we conducted this network meta-analysis (NMA) to study the efficacy and safety of ANGF for the treatment of LBP, and to guide for clinical practice and further research. Method: PubMed, Scopus, Embase, CNKI, and the Cochrane Library were searched from January 1980 to March 2021. A frequentist framework network meta-analysis with a random-effect model was performed. Ranking effects were calculated by surface under the cumulative ranking analysis (SUCRA) and clusterank analysis. Results: This NMA identified 30 studies, involving 9,508 patients with LBP. ANGF reported both superior effect on pain relief {SUCRA 82.1%, SMD 0.89, 95% CI [(0.26,1.51)]} and function improvement {SUCRA 77.3%, SMD 0.93, 95% CI [(0.27,1.58)]} than placebo, and did not showed any higher risk of treatment-emergent adverse effects {RR 1.11, 95% CI [(0.97,1.27)]} or serious adverse effects {RR 1.03, 95% CI [(0.54,1.97)]}, but it was associate with a special risk of rapidly progressive osteoarthritis. ANGF displayed the greatest potential to be the most effective and safest treatment (cluster-rank value for function improvement and safety: 4266.96, for pain relief and safety: 4531.92). Conclusion: ANGF could relieve pain and improve function effectively and are superior to other traditional drugs recommended by guidelines. Although no significant difference in tolerability and safety between ANGFs and placebo was found, the rapid progression of original osteoarthritis which may be related to the use of ANGFs still needs special attention and furtherly verification by clinical trials. Systematic Review Registration: PROSPERO, identifier [CRD42021258033]. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-08-31 /pmc/articles/PMC8438173/ /pubmed/34531752 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2021.727771 Text en Copyright © 2021 Cao, Li, Guo, Li and Wu. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Pharmacology
Cao, Ziqin
Li, Qiangxiang
Guo, Jia
Li, Yajia
Wu, Jianhuang
Is Targeting Nerve Growth Factor Antagonist a New Option for Pharmacologic Treatment of Low Back Pain? A Supplemental Network Meta-Analysis of the American College of Physicians Guidelines
title Is Targeting Nerve Growth Factor Antagonist a New Option for Pharmacologic Treatment of Low Back Pain? A Supplemental Network Meta-Analysis of the American College of Physicians Guidelines
title_full Is Targeting Nerve Growth Factor Antagonist a New Option for Pharmacologic Treatment of Low Back Pain? A Supplemental Network Meta-Analysis of the American College of Physicians Guidelines
title_fullStr Is Targeting Nerve Growth Factor Antagonist a New Option for Pharmacologic Treatment of Low Back Pain? A Supplemental Network Meta-Analysis of the American College of Physicians Guidelines
title_full_unstemmed Is Targeting Nerve Growth Factor Antagonist a New Option for Pharmacologic Treatment of Low Back Pain? A Supplemental Network Meta-Analysis of the American College of Physicians Guidelines
title_short Is Targeting Nerve Growth Factor Antagonist a New Option for Pharmacologic Treatment of Low Back Pain? A Supplemental Network Meta-Analysis of the American College of Physicians Guidelines
title_sort is targeting nerve growth factor antagonist a new option for pharmacologic treatment of low back pain? a supplemental network meta-analysis of the american college of physicians guidelines
topic Pharmacology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8438173/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34531752
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2021.727771
work_keys_str_mv AT caoziqin istargetingnervegrowthfactorantagonistanewoptionforpharmacologictreatmentoflowbackpainasupplementalnetworkmetaanalysisoftheamericancollegeofphysiciansguidelines
AT liqiangxiang istargetingnervegrowthfactorantagonistanewoptionforpharmacologictreatmentoflowbackpainasupplementalnetworkmetaanalysisoftheamericancollegeofphysiciansguidelines
AT guojia istargetingnervegrowthfactorantagonistanewoptionforpharmacologictreatmentoflowbackpainasupplementalnetworkmetaanalysisoftheamericancollegeofphysiciansguidelines
AT liyajia istargetingnervegrowthfactorantagonistanewoptionforpharmacologictreatmentoflowbackpainasupplementalnetworkmetaanalysisoftheamericancollegeofphysiciansguidelines
AT wujianhuang istargetingnervegrowthfactorantagonistanewoptionforpharmacologictreatmentoflowbackpainasupplementalnetworkmetaanalysisoftheamericancollegeofphysiciansguidelines