Cargando…
Which Neural Network to Choose for Post-Fault Localization, Dynamic State Estimation, and Optimal Measurement Placement in Power Systems?
We consider a power transmission system monitored using phasor measurement units (PMUs) placed at significant, but not all, nodes of the system. Assuming that a sufficient number of distinct single-line faults, specifically the pre-fault state and the (not cleared) post-fault state, are recorded by...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8438307/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34532706 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fdata.2021.692493 |
_version_ | 1783752343321313280 |
---|---|
author | Afonin, Andrei Chertkov, Michael |
author_facet | Afonin, Andrei Chertkov, Michael |
author_sort | Afonin, Andrei |
collection | PubMed |
description | We consider a power transmission system monitored using phasor measurement units (PMUs) placed at significant, but not all, nodes of the system. Assuming that a sufficient number of distinct single-line faults, specifically the pre-fault state and the (not cleared) post-fault state, are recorded by the PMUs and are available for training, we first design a comprehensive sequence of neural networks (NNs) locating the faulty line. Performance of different NNs in the sequence, including linear regression, feed-forward NNs, AlexNet, graph convolutional NNs, neural linear ordinary differential equations (ODEs) and neural graph-based ODEs, ordered according to the type and amount of the power flow physics involved, are compared for different levels of observability. Second, we build a sequence of advanced power system dynamics–informed and neural ODE–based machine learning schemes that are trained, given the pre-fault state, to predict the post-fault state and also, in parallel, to estimate system parameters. Finally, third and continuing to work with the first (fault localization) setting, we design an (NN-based) algorithm which discovers optimal PMU placement. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8438307 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84383072021-09-15 Which Neural Network to Choose for Post-Fault Localization, Dynamic State Estimation, and Optimal Measurement Placement in Power Systems? Afonin, Andrei Chertkov, Michael Front Big Data Big Data We consider a power transmission system monitored using phasor measurement units (PMUs) placed at significant, but not all, nodes of the system. Assuming that a sufficient number of distinct single-line faults, specifically the pre-fault state and the (not cleared) post-fault state, are recorded by the PMUs and are available for training, we first design a comprehensive sequence of neural networks (NNs) locating the faulty line. Performance of different NNs in the sequence, including linear regression, feed-forward NNs, AlexNet, graph convolutional NNs, neural linear ordinary differential equations (ODEs) and neural graph-based ODEs, ordered according to the type and amount of the power flow physics involved, are compared for different levels of observability. Second, we build a sequence of advanced power system dynamics–informed and neural ODE–based machine learning schemes that are trained, given the pre-fault state, to predict the post-fault state and also, in parallel, to estimate system parameters. Finally, third and continuing to work with the first (fault localization) setting, we design an (NN-based) algorithm which discovers optimal PMU placement. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-08-31 /pmc/articles/PMC8438307/ /pubmed/34532706 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fdata.2021.692493 Text en Copyright © 2021 Afonin and Chertkov. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Big Data Afonin, Andrei Chertkov, Michael Which Neural Network to Choose for Post-Fault Localization, Dynamic State Estimation, and Optimal Measurement Placement in Power Systems? |
title | Which Neural Network to Choose for Post-Fault Localization, Dynamic State Estimation, and Optimal Measurement Placement in Power Systems? |
title_full | Which Neural Network to Choose for Post-Fault Localization, Dynamic State Estimation, and Optimal Measurement Placement in Power Systems? |
title_fullStr | Which Neural Network to Choose for Post-Fault Localization, Dynamic State Estimation, and Optimal Measurement Placement in Power Systems? |
title_full_unstemmed | Which Neural Network to Choose for Post-Fault Localization, Dynamic State Estimation, and Optimal Measurement Placement in Power Systems? |
title_short | Which Neural Network to Choose for Post-Fault Localization, Dynamic State Estimation, and Optimal Measurement Placement in Power Systems? |
title_sort | which neural network to choose for post-fault localization, dynamic state estimation, and optimal measurement placement in power systems? |
topic | Big Data |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8438307/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34532706 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fdata.2021.692493 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT afoninandrei whichneuralnetworktochooseforpostfaultlocalizationdynamicstateestimationandoptimalmeasurementplacementinpowersystems AT chertkovmichael whichneuralnetworktochooseforpostfaultlocalizationdynamicstateestimationandoptimalmeasurementplacementinpowersystems |