Cargando…
Effects of Patent Ductus Arteriosus on the Hemodynamics of Modified Blalock–Taussig Shunt Based on Patient-Specific Simulation
The question of preserving the patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) during the modified Blalock–Taussig shunt (MBTS) procedure remains controversial. The goal of this study was to investigate the effects of the PDA on the flow features of the MBTS to help with preoperative surgery design and postoperative...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8438520/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34531758 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2021.707128 |
Sumario: | The question of preserving the patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) during the modified Blalock–Taussig shunt (MBTS) procedure remains controversial. The goal of this study was to investigate the effects of the PDA on the flow features of the MBTS to help with preoperative surgery design and postoperative prediction. In this study, a patient with pulmonary atresia and PDA was included. A patient-specific three-dimensional model was reconstructed, and virtual surgeries of shunt insertion and ductus ligation were performed using computer-aided design. Computational fluid dynamics was utilized to analyze the hemodynamic parameters of varied models based on the patient-specific anatomy and physiological data. The preservation of the PDA competitively reduced the shunt flow but increased total pulmonary perfusion. The shunt flow and ductal flow collided, causing significant and complicated turbulence in the pulmonary artery where low wall shear stress, high oscillatory shear index, and high relative residence time were distributed. The highest energy loss was found when the PDA was preserved. The preservation of PDA is not recommended during MBTS procedures because it negatively influences hemodynamics. This may lead to pulmonary overperfusion, inadequate systemic perfusion, and a heavier cardiac burden, thus increasing the risk of heart failure. Also, it seems to bring no benefit in terms of reducing the risk for thrombosis. |
---|