Cargando…

Health status of individuals referred to first-line intervention for hip and knee osteoarthritis compared with the general population: an observational register-based study

OBJECTIVES: To describe the prevalence of comorbidities in a population referred to standardised first-line intervention (patient education and exercise) for hip and knee osteoarthritis (OA), in comparison with the general population. Furthermore, we aimed to evaluate if eventual differences were as...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gustafsson, Kristin, Kvist, Joanna, Eriksson, Marit, Dell'Isola, Andrea, Zhou, Caddie, Dahlberg, Leif E., Rolfson, Ola
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8438840/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34518262
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049476
_version_ 1783752422523404288
author Gustafsson, Kristin
Kvist, Joanna
Eriksson, Marit
Dell'Isola, Andrea
Zhou, Caddie
Dahlberg, Leif E.
Rolfson, Ola
author_facet Gustafsson, Kristin
Kvist, Joanna
Eriksson, Marit
Dell'Isola, Andrea
Zhou, Caddie
Dahlberg, Leif E.
Rolfson, Ola
author_sort Gustafsson, Kristin
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To describe the prevalence of comorbidities in a population referred to standardised first-line intervention (patient education and exercise) for hip and knee osteoarthritis (OA), in comparison with the general population. Furthermore, we aimed to evaluate if eventual differences were associated with socioeconomic inequalities. DESIGN: Register-based study. SETTING: Primary healthcare, Sweden. PARTICIPANTS: Individuals with hip and/or knee OA included in the Better Management for Patients with Osteoarthritis Register between 2008 and 2016 and and an age-matched, sex-matched and residence-matched reference cohort (1:3) from the general Swedish population. OUTCOME MEASURES: Comorbidities were identified with the RxRisk Index, the Elixhauser Comorbidity Index and the Charlson Comorbidity Index, and presented with descriptive statistics as (1) individual diseases, (2) disease categories and (3) scores for each index. The prevalence of comorbidities in the two populations was tested using logistic regression, with separate analyses for age groups and the most affected joint. We then adjusted the analyses for socioeconomic status. RESULTS: In this OA population, 85% had ≥1 comorbidity compared with 78% of the reference cohort (OR; 1.62 (95% CI 1.59 to 1.66)). Cardiovascular/blood diseases were the most common comorbidities in both populations (OA, 59%; reference, 54%), with OR; 1.22 (95% CI 1.20 to 1.24) for the OA population. Younger individuals with OA were more comorbid than their matched references overall, and population differences decreased with age (eg, ≥3 comorbidities, aged ≤45 years OR; 1.74 (95% CI 1.52 to 1.98), ≥81 years OR; 0.95 (95% CI 0.87 to 1.04)). Individuals with knee OA were more comorbid than those with hip OA overall. Adjustment for socioeconomic status did not change the estimates. CONCLUSION: Comorbidities were more common among individuals with hip and knee OA than among matched references from the general population. The differences could not be explained by socioeconomic status. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03438630.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8438840
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84388402021-09-24 Health status of individuals referred to first-line intervention for hip and knee osteoarthritis compared with the general population: an observational register-based study Gustafsson, Kristin Kvist, Joanna Eriksson, Marit Dell'Isola, Andrea Zhou, Caddie Dahlberg, Leif E. Rolfson, Ola BMJ Open Epidemiology OBJECTIVES: To describe the prevalence of comorbidities in a population referred to standardised first-line intervention (patient education and exercise) for hip and knee osteoarthritis (OA), in comparison with the general population. Furthermore, we aimed to evaluate if eventual differences were associated with socioeconomic inequalities. DESIGN: Register-based study. SETTING: Primary healthcare, Sweden. PARTICIPANTS: Individuals with hip and/or knee OA included in the Better Management for Patients with Osteoarthritis Register between 2008 and 2016 and and an age-matched, sex-matched and residence-matched reference cohort (1:3) from the general Swedish population. OUTCOME MEASURES: Comorbidities were identified with the RxRisk Index, the Elixhauser Comorbidity Index and the Charlson Comorbidity Index, and presented with descriptive statistics as (1) individual diseases, (2) disease categories and (3) scores for each index. The prevalence of comorbidities in the two populations was tested using logistic regression, with separate analyses for age groups and the most affected joint. We then adjusted the analyses for socioeconomic status. RESULTS: In this OA population, 85% had ≥1 comorbidity compared with 78% of the reference cohort (OR; 1.62 (95% CI 1.59 to 1.66)). Cardiovascular/blood diseases were the most common comorbidities in both populations (OA, 59%; reference, 54%), with OR; 1.22 (95% CI 1.20 to 1.24) for the OA population. Younger individuals with OA were more comorbid than their matched references overall, and population differences decreased with age (eg, ≥3 comorbidities, aged ≤45 years OR; 1.74 (95% CI 1.52 to 1.98), ≥81 years OR; 0.95 (95% CI 0.87 to 1.04)). Individuals with knee OA were more comorbid than those with hip OA overall. Adjustment for socioeconomic status did not change the estimates. CONCLUSION: Comorbidities were more common among individuals with hip and knee OA than among matched references from the general population. The differences could not be explained by socioeconomic status. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03438630. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-09-12 /pmc/articles/PMC8438840/ /pubmed/34518262 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049476 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Epidemiology
Gustafsson, Kristin
Kvist, Joanna
Eriksson, Marit
Dell'Isola, Andrea
Zhou, Caddie
Dahlberg, Leif E.
Rolfson, Ola
Health status of individuals referred to first-line intervention for hip and knee osteoarthritis compared with the general population: an observational register-based study
title Health status of individuals referred to first-line intervention for hip and knee osteoarthritis compared with the general population: an observational register-based study
title_full Health status of individuals referred to first-line intervention for hip and knee osteoarthritis compared with the general population: an observational register-based study
title_fullStr Health status of individuals referred to first-line intervention for hip and knee osteoarthritis compared with the general population: an observational register-based study
title_full_unstemmed Health status of individuals referred to first-line intervention for hip and knee osteoarthritis compared with the general population: an observational register-based study
title_short Health status of individuals referred to first-line intervention for hip and knee osteoarthritis compared with the general population: an observational register-based study
title_sort health status of individuals referred to first-line intervention for hip and knee osteoarthritis compared with the general population: an observational register-based study
topic Epidemiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8438840/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34518262
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049476
work_keys_str_mv AT gustafssonkristin healthstatusofindividualsreferredtofirstlineinterventionforhipandkneeosteoarthritiscomparedwiththegeneralpopulationanobservationalregisterbasedstudy
AT kvistjoanna healthstatusofindividualsreferredtofirstlineinterventionforhipandkneeosteoarthritiscomparedwiththegeneralpopulationanobservationalregisterbasedstudy
AT erikssonmarit healthstatusofindividualsreferredtofirstlineinterventionforhipandkneeosteoarthritiscomparedwiththegeneralpopulationanobservationalregisterbasedstudy
AT dellisolaandrea healthstatusofindividualsreferredtofirstlineinterventionforhipandkneeosteoarthritiscomparedwiththegeneralpopulationanobservationalregisterbasedstudy
AT zhoucaddie healthstatusofindividualsreferredtofirstlineinterventionforhipandkneeosteoarthritiscomparedwiththegeneralpopulationanobservationalregisterbasedstudy
AT dahlbergleife healthstatusofindividualsreferredtofirstlineinterventionforhipandkneeosteoarthritiscomparedwiththegeneralpopulationanobservationalregisterbasedstudy
AT rolfsonola healthstatusofindividualsreferredtofirstlineinterventionforhipandkneeosteoarthritiscomparedwiththegeneralpopulationanobservationalregisterbasedstudy