Cargando…

Mixed-methods study protocol: do national reporting and learning system medication incidents in palliative care reflect patient and carer concerns about medication management and safety?

INTRODUCTION: Approximately 20% of serious safety incidents involving palliative patients relate to medication. These are disproportionately reported when patients are in their usual residence when compared with hospital or hospice. While patient safety incident reporting systems can support profess...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yardley, Sarah, Francis, Sally-Anne, Chuter, Antony, Hellard, Stuart, Abernethy, Julia, Carson-Stevens, A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8438946/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34518258
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-048696
_version_ 1783752442501922816
author Yardley, Sarah
Francis, Sally-Anne
Chuter, Antony
Hellard, Stuart
Abernethy, Julia
Carson-Stevens, A
author_facet Yardley, Sarah
Francis, Sally-Anne
Chuter, Antony
Hellard, Stuart
Abernethy, Julia
Carson-Stevens, A
author_sort Yardley, Sarah
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Approximately 20% of serious safety incidents involving palliative patients relate to medication. These are disproportionately reported when patients are in their usual residence when compared with hospital or hospice. While patient safety incident reporting systems can support professional learning, it is unclear whether these reports encompass patient and carer concerns with palliative medications or interpersonal safety. AIM: To explore and compare perceptions of (un)safe palliative medication management from patient, carer and professional perspectives in community, hospital and hospice settings. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will use an innovative mixed-methods study design combining systematic review searching techniques with cross-sectional quantitative descriptive analysis and interpretative qualitative metasynthesis to integrate three elements: (1) Scoping review: multiple database searches for empirical studies and first-hand experiences in English (no other restrictions) to establish how patients and informal carers conceptualise safety in palliative medication management. (2)Medication incidents from the England and Wales National Reporting and Learning System: identifying and characterising reports to understand professional perspectives on suboptimal palliative medication management. (3) Comparison of 1 and 2: contextualising with stakeholder perspectives. PATIENT AND PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT: Our team includes a funded patient and public involvement (PPI) collaborator, with experience of promoting patient-centred approaches in patient safety research. Funded discussion and dissemination events with PPI and healthcare (clinical and policy) professionals are planned. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Prospective ethical approval granted: Cardiff University School of Medicine Research Ethics Committee (Ref 19/28). Our study will synthesise multivoiced constructions of patient safety in palliative care to identify implications for professional learning and actions that are relevant across health and social care. It will also identify changing or escalating patterns in palliative medication incidents due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Peer-reviewed publications, academic presentations, plain English summaries, press releases and social media will be used to disseminate to the public, researchers, clinicians and policy-makers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8438946
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84389462021-09-24 Mixed-methods study protocol: do national reporting and learning system medication incidents in palliative care reflect patient and carer concerns about medication management and safety? Yardley, Sarah Francis, Sally-Anne Chuter, Antony Hellard, Stuart Abernethy, Julia Carson-Stevens, A BMJ Open Palliative Care INTRODUCTION: Approximately 20% of serious safety incidents involving palliative patients relate to medication. These are disproportionately reported when patients are in their usual residence when compared with hospital or hospice. While patient safety incident reporting systems can support professional learning, it is unclear whether these reports encompass patient and carer concerns with palliative medications or interpersonal safety. AIM: To explore and compare perceptions of (un)safe palliative medication management from patient, carer and professional perspectives in community, hospital and hospice settings. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will use an innovative mixed-methods study design combining systematic review searching techniques with cross-sectional quantitative descriptive analysis and interpretative qualitative metasynthesis to integrate three elements: (1) Scoping review: multiple database searches for empirical studies and first-hand experiences in English (no other restrictions) to establish how patients and informal carers conceptualise safety in palliative medication management. (2)Medication incidents from the England and Wales National Reporting and Learning System: identifying and characterising reports to understand professional perspectives on suboptimal palliative medication management. (3) Comparison of 1 and 2: contextualising with stakeholder perspectives. PATIENT AND PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT: Our team includes a funded patient and public involvement (PPI) collaborator, with experience of promoting patient-centred approaches in patient safety research. Funded discussion and dissemination events with PPI and healthcare (clinical and policy) professionals are planned. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Prospective ethical approval granted: Cardiff University School of Medicine Research Ethics Committee (Ref 19/28). Our study will synthesise multivoiced constructions of patient safety in palliative care to identify implications for professional learning and actions that are relevant across health and social care. It will also identify changing or escalating patterns in palliative medication incidents due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Peer-reviewed publications, academic presentations, plain English summaries, press releases and social media will be used to disseminate to the public, researchers, clinicians and policy-makers. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-09-13 /pmc/articles/PMC8438946/ /pubmed/34518258 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-048696 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Palliative Care
Yardley, Sarah
Francis, Sally-Anne
Chuter, Antony
Hellard, Stuart
Abernethy, Julia
Carson-Stevens, A
Mixed-methods study protocol: do national reporting and learning system medication incidents in palliative care reflect patient and carer concerns about medication management and safety?
title Mixed-methods study protocol: do national reporting and learning system medication incidents in palliative care reflect patient and carer concerns about medication management and safety?
title_full Mixed-methods study protocol: do national reporting and learning system medication incidents in palliative care reflect patient and carer concerns about medication management and safety?
title_fullStr Mixed-methods study protocol: do national reporting and learning system medication incidents in palliative care reflect patient and carer concerns about medication management and safety?
title_full_unstemmed Mixed-methods study protocol: do national reporting and learning system medication incidents in palliative care reflect patient and carer concerns about medication management and safety?
title_short Mixed-methods study protocol: do national reporting and learning system medication incidents in palliative care reflect patient and carer concerns about medication management and safety?
title_sort mixed-methods study protocol: do national reporting and learning system medication incidents in palliative care reflect patient and carer concerns about medication management and safety?
topic Palliative Care
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8438946/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34518258
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-048696
work_keys_str_mv AT yardleysarah mixedmethodsstudyprotocoldonationalreportingandlearningsystemmedicationincidentsinpalliativecarereflectpatientandcarerconcernsaboutmedicationmanagementandsafety
AT francissallyanne mixedmethodsstudyprotocoldonationalreportingandlearningsystemmedicationincidentsinpalliativecarereflectpatientandcarerconcernsaboutmedicationmanagementandsafety
AT chuterantony mixedmethodsstudyprotocoldonationalreportingandlearningsystemmedicationincidentsinpalliativecarereflectpatientandcarerconcernsaboutmedicationmanagementandsafety
AT hellardstuart mixedmethodsstudyprotocoldonationalreportingandlearningsystemmedicationincidentsinpalliativecarereflectpatientandcarerconcernsaboutmedicationmanagementandsafety
AT abernethyjulia mixedmethodsstudyprotocoldonationalreportingandlearningsystemmedicationincidentsinpalliativecarereflectpatientandcarerconcernsaboutmedicationmanagementandsafety
AT carsonstevensa mixedmethodsstudyprotocoldonationalreportingandlearningsystemmedicationincidentsinpalliativecarereflectpatientandcarerconcernsaboutmedicationmanagementandsafety