Cargando…

Simplified models to assess newborn gestational age in low-middle income countries: findings from a multicountry, prospective cohort study

INTRODUCTION: Preterm birth is the leading cause of child mortality. This study aimed to develop and validate programmatically feasible and accurate approaches to estimate newborn gestational age (GA) in low resource settings. METHODS: The WHO Alliance for Maternal and Newborn Health Improvement (AM...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8438948/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34518201
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2021-005688
_version_ 1783752442979024896
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Preterm birth is the leading cause of child mortality. This study aimed to develop and validate programmatically feasible and accurate approaches to estimate newborn gestational age (GA) in low resource settings. METHODS: The WHO Alliance for Maternal and Newborn Health Improvement (AMANHI) study recruited pregnant women from population-based cohorts in five countries (Bangladesh, Ghana, Pakistan, Tanzania and Zambia). Women <20 weeks gestation by ultrasound-based dating were enrolled. Research staff assessed newborns for: (1) anthropometry, (2) neuromuscular/physical signs and (3) feeding maturity. Machine-learning techniques were used to construct ensemble models. Diagnostic accuracy was assessed by areas under the receiver operating curve (AUC) and Bland-Altman analysis. RESULTS: 7428 liveborn infants were included (n=536 preterm, <37 weeks). The Ballard examination was biased compared with ultrasound dating (mean difference: +9 days) with 95% limits of agreement (LOA) −15.3 to 33.6 days (precision ±24.5 days). A model including 10 newborn characteristics (birth weight, head circumference, chest circumference, foot length, breast bud diameter, breast development, plantar creases, skin texture, ankle dorsiflexion and infant sex) estimated GA with no bias, 95% LOA ±17.3 days and an AUC=0.88 for classifying the preterm infant. A model that included last menstrual period (LMP) with the 10 characteristics had 95% LOA ±15.7 days and high diagnostic accuracy (AUC 0.91). An alternative simpler model including birth weight and LMP had 95% LOA of ±16.7 and an AUC of 0.88. CONCLUSION: The best machine-learning model (10 neonatal characteristics and LMP) estimated GA within ±15.7 days of early ultrasound dating. Simpler models performed reasonably well with marginal increases in prediction error. These models hold promise for newborn GA estimation when ultrasound dating is unavailable.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8438948
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84389482021-09-24 Simplified models to assess newborn gestational age in low-middle income countries: findings from a multicountry, prospective cohort study BMJ Glob Health Original Research INTRODUCTION: Preterm birth is the leading cause of child mortality. This study aimed to develop and validate programmatically feasible and accurate approaches to estimate newborn gestational age (GA) in low resource settings. METHODS: The WHO Alliance for Maternal and Newborn Health Improvement (AMANHI) study recruited pregnant women from population-based cohorts in five countries (Bangladesh, Ghana, Pakistan, Tanzania and Zambia). Women <20 weeks gestation by ultrasound-based dating were enrolled. Research staff assessed newborns for: (1) anthropometry, (2) neuromuscular/physical signs and (3) feeding maturity. Machine-learning techniques were used to construct ensemble models. Diagnostic accuracy was assessed by areas under the receiver operating curve (AUC) and Bland-Altman analysis. RESULTS: 7428 liveborn infants were included (n=536 preterm, <37 weeks). The Ballard examination was biased compared with ultrasound dating (mean difference: +9 days) with 95% limits of agreement (LOA) −15.3 to 33.6 days (precision ±24.5 days). A model including 10 newborn characteristics (birth weight, head circumference, chest circumference, foot length, breast bud diameter, breast development, plantar creases, skin texture, ankle dorsiflexion and infant sex) estimated GA with no bias, 95% LOA ±17.3 days and an AUC=0.88 for classifying the preterm infant. A model that included last menstrual period (LMP) with the 10 characteristics had 95% LOA ±15.7 days and high diagnostic accuracy (AUC 0.91). An alternative simpler model including birth weight and LMP had 95% LOA of ±16.7 and an AUC of 0.88. CONCLUSION: The best machine-learning model (10 neonatal characteristics and LMP) estimated GA within ±15.7 days of early ultrasound dating. Simpler models performed reasonably well with marginal increases in prediction error. These models hold promise for newborn GA estimation when ultrasound dating is unavailable. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-09-13 /pmc/articles/PMC8438948/ /pubmed/34518201 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2021-005688 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Research
Simplified models to assess newborn gestational age in low-middle income countries: findings from a multicountry, prospective cohort study
title Simplified models to assess newborn gestational age in low-middle income countries: findings from a multicountry, prospective cohort study
title_full Simplified models to assess newborn gestational age in low-middle income countries: findings from a multicountry, prospective cohort study
title_fullStr Simplified models to assess newborn gestational age in low-middle income countries: findings from a multicountry, prospective cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Simplified models to assess newborn gestational age in low-middle income countries: findings from a multicountry, prospective cohort study
title_short Simplified models to assess newborn gestational age in low-middle income countries: findings from a multicountry, prospective cohort study
title_sort simplified models to assess newborn gestational age in low-middle income countries: findings from a multicountry, prospective cohort study
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8438948/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34518201
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2021-005688
work_keys_str_mv AT simplifiedmodelstoassessnewborngestationalageinlowmiddleincomecountriesfindingsfromamulticountryprospectivecohortstudy