Cargando…
Changes in soil carbon sequestration and emission in different succession stages of biological soil crusts in a sand-binding area
BACKGROUND: We investigated the spatio-temporal dynamics of soil carbon dioxide (CO(2))- and soil methane (CH(4))-flux during biological soil crust (BSCs) deposition in a sand-binding area in the eastern Chinese Hobq Desert. The trends in soil organic carbon (C) content and density were analyzed dur...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8439077/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34518908 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13021-021-00190-7 |
_version_ | 1783752468544356352 |
---|---|
author | Wang, Bo Liu, Jing Zhang, Xin Wang, Chenglong |
author_facet | Wang, Bo Liu, Jing Zhang, Xin Wang, Chenglong |
author_sort | Wang, Bo |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: We investigated the spatio-temporal dynamics of soil carbon dioxide (CO(2))- and soil methane (CH(4))-flux during biological soil crust (BSCs) deposition in a sand-binding area in the eastern Chinese Hobq Desert. The trends in soil organic carbon (C) content and density were analyzed during this process. The sampling sites comprised a mobile dune (control) and those with algal, lichen, and moss crust-fixed sands. The desert soil CO(2)- and CH(4)-flux, temperature, and water content were measured from May to October in 2017 and 2018. Simultaneously, organic C content and density were measured and analyzed by stratification. RESULTS: The spatio-temporal variation in desert soil CO(2)-flux was apparent. The average CO(2)- fluxes in the control, algal, lichen, and moss sites were 1.67, 2.61, 5.83, and 6.84 mmol m(−2) h(−1), respectively, during the growing season, and the average CH(4)-fluxes in the four sites were − 1.13, − 1.67, − 3.66, and − 3.77 µmol m(−2) h(−1), respectively. Soil temperature was significantly positively correlated with CO(2)-flux but could not influence CH(4) absorption, and C flux had minimal correlation with soil water content. The soil total organic C density at all sites was significantly different and decreased as follows: moss > lichen > algal > control; moreover, it decreased with soil depth at all sites. The accumulation of desert soil organic C could enhance soil C emissions. CONCLUSION: In a semi-arid desert, artificial planting could promote sand fixation and BSCs succession; therefore, increasing the C storage capacity of desert soils and decreasing soil C emissions could alter the C cycle pattern in desert ecosystems. Soil temperature is the major factor controlling desert soil CO(2) flux and vegetation restoration, and BSCs development could alter the response patterns of C emissions to moisture conditions in desert soils. The results provide a scientific basis for studying the C cycle in desert ecosystems. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8439077 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84390772021-09-15 Changes in soil carbon sequestration and emission in different succession stages of biological soil crusts in a sand-binding area Wang, Bo Liu, Jing Zhang, Xin Wang, Chenglong Carbon Balance Manag Research BACKGROUND: We investigated the spatio-temporal dynamics of soil carbon dioxide (CO(2))- and soil methane (CH(4))-flux during biological soil crust (BSCs) deposition in a sand-binding area in the eastern Chinese Hobq Desert. The trends in soil organic carbon (C) content and density were analyzed during this process. The sampling sites comprised a mobile dune (control) and those with algal, lichen, and moss crust-fixed sands. The desert soil CO(2)- and CH(4)-flux, temperature, and water content were measured from May to October in 2017 and 2018. Simultaneously, organic C content and density were measured and analyzed by stratification. RESULTS: The spatio-temporal variation in desert soil CO(2)-flux was apparent. The average CO(2)- fluxes in the control, algal, lichen, and moss sites were 1.67, 2.61, 5.83, and 6.84 mmol m(−2) h(−1), respectively, during the growing season, and the average CH(4)-fluxes in the four sites were − 1.13, − 1.67, − 3.66, and − 3.77 µmol m(−2) h(−1), respectively. Soil temperature was significantly positively correlated with CO(2)-flux but could not influence CH(4) absorption, and C flux had minimal correlation with soil water content. The soil total organic C density at all sites was significantly different and decreased as follows: moss > lichen > algal > control; moreover, it decreased with soil depth at all sites. The accumulation of desert soil organic C could enhance soil C emissions. CONCLUSION: In a semi-arid desert, artificial planting could promote sand fixation and BSCs succession; therefore, increasing the C storage capacity of desert soils and decreasing soil C emissions could alter the C cycle pattern in desert ecosystems. Soil temperature is the major factor controlling desert soil CO(2) flux and vegetation restoration, and BSCs development could alter the response patterns of C emissions to moisture conditions in desert soils. The results provide a scientific basis for studying the C cycle in desert ecosystems. Springer International Publishing 2021-09-13 /pmc/articles/PMC8439077/ /pubmed/34518908 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13021-021-00190-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Wang, Bo Liu, Jing Zhang, Xin Wang, Chenglong Changes in soil carbon sequestration and emission in different succession stages of biological soil crusts in a sand-binding area |
title | Changes in soil carbon sequestration and emission in different succession stages of biological soil crusts in a sand-binding area |
title_full | Changes in soil carbon sequestration and emission in different succession stages of biological soil crusts in a sand-binding area |
title_fullStr | Changes in soil carbon sequestration and emission in different succession stages of biological soil crusts in a sand-binding area |
title_full_unstemmed | Changes in soil carbon sequestration and emission in different succession stages of biological soil crusts in a sand-binding area |
title_short | Changes in soil carbon sequestration and emission in different succession stages of biological soil crusts in a sand-binding area |
title_sort | changes in soil carbon sequestration and emission in different succession stages of biological soil crusts in a sand-binding area |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8439077/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34518908 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13021-021-00190-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wangbo changesinsoilcarbonsequestrationandemissionindifferentsuccessionstagesofbiologicalsoilcrustsinasandbindingarea AT liujing changesinsoilcarbonsequestrationandemissionindifferentsuccessionstagesofbiologicalsoilcrustsinasandbindingarea AT zhangxin changesinsoilcarbonsequestrationandemissionindifferentsuccessionstagesofbiologicalsoilcrustsinasandbindingarea AT wangchenglong changesinsoilcarbonsequestrationandemissionindifferentsuccessionstagesofbiologicalsoilcrustsinasandbindingarea |