Cargando…

Changes in soil carbon sequestration and emission in different succession stages of biological soil crusts in a sand-binding area

BACKGROUND: We investigated the spatio-temporal dynamics of soil carbon dioxide (CO(2))- and soil methane (CH(4))-flux during biological soil crust (BSCs) deposition in a sand-binding area in the eastern Chinese Hobq Desert. The trends in soil organic carbon (C) content and density were analyzed dur...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Bo, Liu, Jing, Zhang, Xin, Wang, Chenglong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8439077/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34518908
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13021-021-00190-7
_version_ 1783752468544356352
author Wang, Bo
Liu, Jing
Zhang, Xin
Wang, Chenglong
author_facet Wang, Bo
Liu, Jing
Zhang, Xin
Wang, Chenglong
author_sort Wang, Bo
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: We investigated the spatio-temporal dynamics of soil carbon dioxide (CO(2))- and soil methane (CH(4))-flux during biological soil crust (BSCs) deposition in a sand-binding area in the eastern Chinese Hobq Desert. The trends in soil organic carbon (C) content and density were analyzed during this process. The sampling sites comprised a mobile dune (control) and those with algal, lichen, and moss crust-fixed sands. The desert soil CO(2)- and CH(4)-flux, temperature, and water content were measured from May to October in 2017 and 2018. Simultaneously, organic C content and density were measured and analyzed by stratification. RESULTS: The spatio-temporal variation in desert soil CO(2)-flux was apparent. The average CO(2)- fluxes in the control, algal, lichen, and moss sites were 1.67, 2.61, 5.83, and 6.84 mmol m(−2) h(−1), respectively, during the growing season, and the average CH(4)-fluxes in the four sites were − 1.13, − 1.67, − 3.66, and − 3.77 µmol m(−2) h(−1), respectively. Soil temperature was significantly positively correlated with CO(2)-flux but could not influence CH(4) absorption, and C flux had minimal correlation with soil water content. The soil total organic C density at all sites was significantly different and decreased as follows: moss > lichen > algal > control; moreover, it decreased with soil depth at all sites. The accumulation of desert soil organic C could enhance soil C emissions. CONCLUSION: In a semi-arid desert, artificial planting could promote sand fixation and BSCs succession; therefore, increasing the C storage capacity of desert soils and decreasing soil C emissions could alter the C cycle pattern in desert ecosystems. Soil temperature is the major factor controlling desert soil CO(2) flux and vegetation restoration, and BSCs development could alter the response patterns of C emissions to moisture conditions in desert soils. The results provide a scientific basis for studying the C cycle in desert ecosystems.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8439077
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84390772021-09-15 Changes in soil carbon sequestration and emission in different succession stages of biological soil crusts in a sand-binding area Wang, Bo Liu, Jing Zhang, Xin Wang, Chenglong Carbon Balance Manag Research BACKGROUND: We investigated the spatio-temporal dynamics of soil carbon dioxide (CO(2))- and soil methane (CH(4))-flux during biological soil crust (BSCs) deposition in a sand-binding area in the eastern Chinese Hobq Desert. The trends in soil organic carbon (C) content and density were analyzed during this process. The sampling sites comprised a mobile dune (control) and those with algal, lichen, and moss crust-fixed sands. The desert soil CO(2)- and CH(4)-flux, temperature, and water content were measured from May to October in 2017 and 2018. Simultaneously, organic C content and density were measured and analyzed by stratification. RESULTS: The spatio-temporal variation in desert soil CO(2)-flux was apparent. The average CO(2)- fluxes in the control, algal, lichen, and moss sites were 1.67, 2.61, 5.83, and 6.84 mmol m(−2) h(−1), respectively, during the growing season, and the average CH(4)-fluxes in the four sites were − 1.13, − 1.67, − 3.66, and − 3.77 µmol m(−2) h(−1), respectively. Soil temperature was significantly positively correlated with CO(2)-flux but could not influence CH(4) absorption, and C flux had minimal correlation with soil water content. The soil total organic C density at all sites was significantly different and decreased as follows: moss > lichen > algal > control; moreover, it decreased with soil depth at all sites. The accumulation of desert soil organic C could enhance soil C emissions. CONCLUSION: In a semi-arid desert, artificial planting could promote sand fixation and BSCs succession; therefore, increasing the C storage capacity of desert soils and decreasing soil C emissions could alter the C cycle pattern in desert ecosystems. Soil temperature is the major factor controlling desert soil CO(2) flux and vegetation restoration, and BSCs development could alter the response patterns of C emissions to moisture conditions in desert soils. The results provide a scientific basis for studying the C cycle in desert ecosystems. Springer International Publishing 2021-09-13 /pmc/articles/PMC8439077/ /pubmed/34518908 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13021-021-00190-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Wang, Bo
Liu, Jing
Zhang, Xin
Wang, Chenglong
Changes in soil carbon sequestration and emission in different succession stages of biological soil crusts in a sand-binding area
title Changes in soil carbon sequestration and emission in different succession stages of biological soil crusts in a sand-binding area
title_full Changes in soil carbon sequestration and emission in different succession stages of biological soil crusts in a sand-binding area
title_fullStr Changes in soil carbon sequestration and emission in different succession stages of biological soil crusts in a sand-binding area
title_full_unstemmed Changes in soil carbon sequestration and emission in different succession stages of biological soil crusts in a sand-binding area
title_short Changes in soil carbon sequestration and emission in different succession stages of biological soil crusts in a sand-binding area
title_sort changes in soil carbon sequestration and emission in different succession stages of biological soil crusts in a sand-binding area
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8439077/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34518908
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13021-021-00190-7
work_keys_str_mv AT wangbo changesinsoilcarbonsequestrationandemissionindifferentsuccessionstagesofbiologicalsoilcrustsinasandbindingarea
AT liujing changesinsoilcarbonsequestrationandemissionindifferentsuccessionstagesofbiologicalsoilcrustsinasandbindingarea
AT zhangxin changesinsoilcarbonsequestrationandemissionindifferentsuccessionstagesofbiologicalsoilcrustsinasandbindingarea
AT wangchenglong changesinsoilcarbonsequestrationandemissionindifferentsuccessionstagesofbiologicalsoilcrustsinasandbindingarea