Cargando…

Prevalence estimates of genital Chlamydia trachomatis infection in Belgium: results from two cross-sectional studies

BACKGROUND: Chlamydia trachomatis (chlamydia) is the most diagnosed sexually transmitted infection in Belgium. Screening programs focus on young women, due to the implications of chronic asymptomatic infections for reproductive health. Thereby, the frequency of infections in men and older adults is...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fischer, Natalie, Peeters, Ilse, Klamer, Sofieke, Montourcy, Marion, Cuylaerts, Vicky, Van Beckhoven, Dominique, De Baetselier, Irith, Van der Heyden, Johan, Vanden Berghe, Wim
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8439092/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34521367
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-021-06646-y
_version_ 1783752471418503168
author Fischer, Natalie
Peeters, Ilse
Klamer, Sofieke
Montourcy, Marion
Cuylaerts, Vicky
Van Beckhoven, Dominique
De Baetselier, Irith
Van der Heyden, Johan
Vanden Berghe, Wim
author_facet Fischer, Natalie
Peeters, Ilse
Klamer, Sofieke
Montourcy, Marion
Cuylaerts, Vicky
Van Beckhoven, Dominique
De Baetselier, Irith
Van der Heyden, Johan
Vanden Berghe, Wim
author_sort Fischer, Natalie
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Chlamydia trachomatis (chlamydia) is the most diagnosed sexually transmitted infection in Belgium. Screening programs focus on young women, due to the implications of chronic asymptomatic infections for reproductive health. Thereby, the frequency of infections in men and older adults is underestimated. This study aimed to estimate the point-prevalence of chlamydia in the broader Belgian population, to inform evidence-based prevention and control strategies. METHODS: We conducted two cross-sectional prevalence studies of chlamydia infection in the population of Belgium aged 16–59 years, 2018–2020. In the CT1 study 12,000 representative individuals were randomly selected from the national register and invited by letter to collect a urine sample at home. The CT2 study used urine samples collected through the Belgian Health Examination Survey. Molecular detection of chlamydia DNA was performed using Xpert(®) or Abbott Real-Time CT/NG assays. Weighted estimated prevalence and 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated per gender and age groups of 16/18–29, 30–44 and 45–59 years, relative to the general Belgian population. Data collected on sociodemographic variables and sexual behavior were used to identify potential risk factors for chlamydia infection through calculation of the odds ratio (OR). RESULTS: The population-wide weighted estimated prevalence was 1.54% (95% CI 0.78–3) in CT1 and 1.76% (95% CI 0.63–4) in CT2. We observed no statistically significant difference between men and women or age groups. Civil relationship status (OR = 14.1 (95% CI 1.78–112), p < 0.01), sexual intercourse with a casual partner (OR = 6.31 (95% CI 1.66–24.1), p < 0.01) and > 3 sexual partners in the last 12 months (OR = 4.53 (95% CI 1.10–18.6), p = 0.02) were associated with higher relative risk for chlamydia infection. CONCLUSION: Nationwide prevalence studies are relevant to assess the distribution of chlamydia and inform public health actions. The overall low prevalence and heterogeneous distribution of chlamydia in the general Belgian population needs to be considered for future strategies and potential harm of testing and treating asymptomatic individuals need to be taken into account. Effective case management should include appropriate treatment of symptomatic patients and partner notification, and prevention strategies should encourage behaviors such as condom use. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12879-021-06646-y.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8439092
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84390922021-09-14 Prevalence estimates of genital Chlamydia trachomatis infection in Belgium: results from two cross-sectional studies Fischer, Natalie Peeters, Ilse Klamer, Sofieke Montourcy, Marion Cuylaerts, Vicky Van Beckhoven, Dominique De Baetselier, Irith Van der Heyden, Johan Vanden Berghe, Wim BMC Infect Dis Research BACKGROUND: Chlamydia trachomatis (chlamydia) is the most diagnosed sexually transmitted infection in Belgium. Screening programs focus on young women, due to the implications of chronic asymptomatic infections for reproductive health. Thereby, the frequency of infections in men and older adults is underestimated. This study aimed to estimate the point-prevalence of chlamydia in the broader Belgian population, to inform evidence-based prevention and control strategies. METHODS: We conducted two cross-sectional prevalence studies of chlamydia infection in the population of Belgium aged 16–59 years, 2018–2020. In the CT1 study 12,000 representative individuals were randomly selected from the national register and invited by letter to collect a urine sample at home. The CT2 study used urine samples collected through the Belgian Health Examination Survey. Molecular detection of chlamydia DNA was performed using Xpert(®) or Abbott Real-Time CT/NG assays. Weighted estimated prevalence and 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated per gender and age groups of 16/18–29, 30–44 and 45–59 years, relative to the general Belgian population. Data collected on sociodemographic variables and sexual behavior were used to identify potential risk factors for chlamydia infection through calculation of the odds ratio (OR). RESULTS: The population-wide weighted estimated prevalence was 1.54% (95% CI 0.78–3) in CT1 and 1.76% (95% CI 0.63–4) in CT2. We observed no statistically significant difference between men and women or age groups. Civil relationship status (OR = 14.1 (95% CI 1.78–112), p < 0.01), sexual intercourse with a casual partner (OR = 6.31 (95% CI 1.66–24.1), p < 0.01) and > 3 sexual partners in the last 12 months (OR = 4.53 (95% CI 1.10–18.6), p = 0.02) were associated with higher relative risk for chlamydia infection. CONCLUSION: Nationwide prevalence studies are relevant to assess the distribution of chlamydia and inform public health actions. The overall low prevalence and heterogeneous distribution of chlamydia in the general Belgian population needs to be considered for future strategies and potential harm of testing and treating asymptomatic individuals need to be taken into account. Effective case management should include appropriate treatment of symptomatic patients and partner notification, and prevention strategies should encourage behaviors such as condom use. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12879-021-06646-y. BioMed Central 2021-09-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8439092/ /pubmed/34521367 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-021-06646-y Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Fischer, Natalie
Peeters, Ilse
Klamer, Sofieke
Montourcy, Marion
Cuylaerts, Vicky
Van Beckhoven, Dominique
De Baetselier, Irith
Van der Heyden, Johan
Vanden Berghe, Wim
Prevalence estimates of genital Chlamydia trachomatis infection in Belgium: results from two cross-sectional studies
title Prevalence estimates of genital Chlamydia trachomatis infection in Belgium: results from two cross-sectional studies
title_full Prevalence estimates of genital Chlamydia trachomatis infection in Belgium: results from two cross-sectional studies
title_fullStr Prevalence estimates of genital Chlamydia trachomatis infection in Belgium: results from two cross-sectional studies
title_full_unstemmed Prevalence estimates of genital Chlamydia trachomatis infection in Belgium: results from two cross-sectional studies
title_short Prevalence estimates of genital Chlamydia trachomatis infection in Belgium: results from two cross-sectional studies
title_sort prevalence estimates of genital chlamydia trachomatis infection in belgium: results from two cross-sectional studies
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8439092/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34521367
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-021-06646-y
work_keys_str_mv AT fischernatalie prevalenceestimatesofgenitalchlamydiatrachomatisinfectioninbelgiumresultsfromtwocrosssectionalstudies
AT peetersilse prevalenceestimatesofgenitalchlamydiatrachomatisinfectioninbelgiumresultsfromtwocrosssectionalstudies
AT klamersofieke prevalenceestimatesofgenitalchlamydiatrachomatisinfectioninbelgiumresultsfromtwocrosssectionalstudies
AT montourcymarion prevalenceestimatesofgenitalchlamydiatrachomatisinfectioninbelgiumresultsfromtwocrosssectionalstudies
AT cuylaertsvicky prevalenceestimatesofgenitalchlamydiatrachomatisinfectioninbelgiumresultsfromtwocrosssectionalstudies
AT vanbeckhovendominique prevalenceestimatesofgenitalchlamydiatrachomatisinfectioninbelgiumresultsfromtwocrosssectionalstudies
AT debaetselieririth prevalenceestimatesofgenitalchlamydiatrachomatisinfectioninbelgiumresultsfromtwocrosssectionalstudies
AT vanderheydenjohan prevalenceestimatesofgenitalchlamydiatrachomatisinfectioninbelgiumresultsfromtwocrosssectionalstudies
AT vandenberghewim prevalenceestimatesofgenitalchlamydiatrachomatisinfectioninbelgiumresultsfromtwocrosssectionalstudies