Cargando…
Peripheral pure ground-glass opacity: segmentectomy versus wedge resection
INTRODUCTION: Sublobar resection has been widely accepted for treating pure ground-glass opacities (GGOs). As GGOs have good prognosis, preserving postoperative pulmonary function is the major concern in surgery. No studies have yet compared the success rates of pulmonary function reservation betwee...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8439096/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34521432 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13019-021-01610-y |
_version_ | 1783752472351735808 |
---|---|
author | Luo, Taobo Chen, Qixun Zeng, Jian Cai, Lei Huang, Xiancong |
author_facet | Luo, Taobo Chen, Qixun Zeng, Jian Cai, Lei Huang, Xiancong |
author_sort | Luo, Taobo |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Sublobar resection has been widely accepted for treating pure ground-glass opacities (GGOs). As GGOs have good prognosis, preserving postoperative pulmonary function is the major concern in surgery. No studies have yet compared the success rates of pulmonary function reservation between segmentectomy and wedge resection. METHOD: The three-dimensional rebuild of computed tomography (CT) images was performed, the segmentectomy and wedge resection of the GGO in the target segment were simulated, and the area of cut surface was measured, which was important data for successful postoperative pulmonary recruitment maneuvers. RESULT: With equal volumes of tissue removed, segmentectomy and wedge resection showed similar surface area loss for RS4 and RS5, followed by LS7 + 8, LS6 and LS1 + 2 segments. Compared with other segments, wedge resection performed in RS10, LS3, LS10, RS9 and RS7 may lead to a loss of lot more surface area than segmentectomy. CONCLUSION: Wedge resection is suggested for segments RS4, RS5, LS1 + 2 and LS7 + 8, whereas segmentectomy is advised for segments RS1, LS4 + 5 and RS2. Meanwhile, deep wedge resection should be avoided for segments RS8, RS7, RS10, LS3, LS10. RS9 and LS9, in order to preserve a larger lung surface area. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8439096 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84390962021-09-14 Peripheral pure ground-glass opacity: segmentectomy versus wedge resection Luo, Taobo Chen, Qixun Zeng, Jian Cai, Lei Huang, Xiancong J Cardiothorac Surg Research Article INTRODUCTION: Sublobar resection has been widely accepted for treating pure ground-glass opacities (GGOs). As GGOs have good prognosis, preserving postoperative pulmonary function is the major concern in surgery. No studies have yet compared the success rates of pulmonary function reservation between segmentectomy and wedge resection. METHOD: The three-dimensional rebuild of computed tomography (CT) images was performed, the segmentectomy and wedge resection of the GGO in the target segment were simulated, and the area of cut surface was measured, which was important data for successful postoperative pulmonary recruitment maneuvers. RESULT: With equal volumes of tissue removed, segmentectomy and wedge resection showed similar surface area loss for RS4 and RS5, followed by LS7 + 8, LS6 and LS1 + 2 segments. Compared with other segments, wedge resection performed in RS10, LS3, LS10, RS9 and RS7 may lead to a loss of lot more surface area than segmentectomy. CONCLUSION: Wedge resection is suggested for segments RS4, RS5, LS1 + 2 and LS7 + 8, whereas segmentectomy is advised for segments RS1, LS4 + 5 and RS2. Meanwhile, deep wedge resection should be avoided for segments RS8, RS7, RS10, LS3, LS10. RS9 and LS9, in order to preserve a larger lung surface area. BioMed Central 2021-09-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8439096/ /pubmed/34521432 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13019-021-01610-y Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Luo, Taobo Chen, Qixun Zeng, Jian Cai, Lei Huang, Xiancong Peripheral pure ground-glass opacity: segmentectomy versus wedge resection |
title | Peripheral pure ground-glass opacity: segmentectomy versus wedge resection |
title_full | Peripheral pure ground-glass opacity: segmentectomy versus wedge resection |
title_fullStr | Peripheral pure ground-glass opacity: segmentectomy versus wedge resection |
title_full_unstemmed | Peripheral pure ground-glass opacity: segmentectomy versus wedge resection |
title_short | Peripheral pure ground-glass opacity: segmentectomy versus wedge resection |
title_sort | peripheral pure ground-glass opacity: segmentectomy versus wedge resection |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8439096/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34521432 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13019-021-01610-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT luotaobo peripheralpuregroundglassopacitysegmentectomyversuswedgeresection AT chenqixun peripheralpuregroundglassopacitysegmentectomyversuswedgeresection AT zengjian peripheralpuregroundglassopacitysegmentectomyversuswedgeresection AT cailei peripheralpuregroundglassopacitysegmentectomyversuswedgeresection AT huangxiancong peripheralpuregroundglassopacitysegmentectomyversuswedgeresection |