Cargando…
Joint preservation surgery in grade 2 and 3 giant cell tumors of bone around the knee
Objective: To evaluate the clinical and functional outcomes of joint preservation surgery in high-grade giant cell tumors (GCT) around the knee joint. Methods: A retrospective review of 25 patients of high-grade GCT (Campanacci grade 2 and 3) involving proximal tibia or distal femur managed by exten...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
EDP Sciences
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8439180/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34519640 http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/sicotj/2021049 |
_version_ | 1783752484507877376 |
---|---|
author | Singh, Saurabh Rai, Alok Dinesh Iyer, R Surana, Rishabh Sharma, Divyansh |
author_facet | Singh, Saurabh Rai, Alok Dinesh Iyer, R Surana, Rishabh Sharma, Divyansh |
author_sort | Singh, Saurabh |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objective: To evaluate the clinical and functional outcomes of joint preservation surgery in high-grade giant cell tumors (GCT) around the knee joint. Methods: A retrospective review of 25 patients of high-grade GCT (Campanacci grade 2 and 3) involving proximal tibia or distal femur managed by extended curettage, bone grafting, and stabilization with knee spanning external fixator between 2016 and 2018 was done. The radiographic outcomes, functional outcomes (Musculoskeletal Tumor Society [MSTS] score for lower limb), and complications including donor site morbidity were evaluated. Results: The mean age of the patient population was 24.04 years with an average follow-up period of 30.24 months. Fourteen patients had involvement of distal femur, and 11 involved proximal tibia. There were 16 cases of grade 2 lesions and 9 cases of grade 3 lesions. Twenty-four out of the 25 patients had radiological consolidation of graft, while one patient had graft subsidence. Twenty-two out of 25 patients had full extension and knee flexion more than 100 degrees. The mean MSTS score was 25.2. Three patients had an MSTS score under 20. All three patients had an extension lag with a restricted range of motion. Conclusion: Joint preservation surgery, when done in line with the basic principles of tumor surgery, gives good radiographic and functional outcomes even in grade 2 and 3 giant cell tumors of bone around the knee and should be attempted before replacement surgeries. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8439180 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | EDP Sciences |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84391802021-09-27 Joint preservation surgery in grade 2 and 3 giant cell tumors of bone around the knee Singh, Saurabh Rai, Alok Dinesh Iyer, R Surana, Rishabh Sharma, Divyansh SICOT J Original Article Objective: To evaluate the clinical and functional outcomes of joint preservation surgery in high-grade giant cell tumors (GCT) around the knee joint. Methods: A retrospective review of 25 patients of high-grade GCT (Campanacci grade 2 and 3) involving proximal tibia or distal femur managed by extended curettage, bone grafting, and stabilization with knee spanning external fixator between 2016 and 2018 was done. The radiographic outcomes, functional outcomes (Musculoskeletal Tumor Society [MSTS] score for lower limb), and complications including donor site morbidity were evaluated. Results: The mean age of the patient population was 24.04 years with an average follow-up period of 30.24 months. Fourteen patients had involvement of distal femur, and 11 involved proximal tibia. There were 16 cases of grade 2 lesions and 9 cases of grade 3 lesions. Twenty-four out of the 25 patients had radiological consolidation of graft, while one patient had graft subsidence. Twenty-two out of 25 patients had full extension and knee flexion more than 100 degrees. The mean MSTS score was 25.2. Three patients had an MSTS score under 20. All three patients had an extension lag with a restricted range of motion. Conclusion: Joint preservation surgery, when done in line with the basic principles of tumor surgery, gives good radiographic and functional outcomes even in grade 2 and 3 giant cell tumors of bone around the knee and should be attempted before replacement surgeries. EDP Sciences 2021-09-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8439180/ /pubmed/34519640 http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/sicotj/2021049 Text en © The Authors, published by EDP Sciences, 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Singh, Saurabh Rai, Alok Dinesh Iyer, R Surana, Rishabh Sharma, Divyansh Joint preservation surgery in grade 2 and 3 giant cell tumors of bone around the knee |
title | Joint preservation surgery in grade 2 and 3 giant cell tumors of bone around the knee |
title_full | Joint preservation surgery in grade 2 and 3 giant cell tumors of bone around the knee |
title_fullStr | Joint preservation surgery in grade 2 and 3 giant cell tumors of bone around the knee |
title_full_unstemmed | Joint preservation surgery in grade 2 and 3 giant cell tumors of bone around the knee |
title_short | Joint preservation surgery in grade 2 and 3 giant cell tumors of bone around the knee |
title_sort | joint preservation surgery in grade 2 and 3 giant cell tumors of bone around the knee |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8439180/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34519640 http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/sicotj/2021049 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT singhsaurabh jointpreservationsurgeryingrade2and3giantcelltumorsofbonearoundtheknee AT raialok jointpreservationsurgeryingrade2and3giantcelltumorsofbonearoundtheknee AT dineshiyerr jointpreservationsurgeryingrade2and3giantcelltumorsofbonearoundtheknee AT suranarishabh jointpreservationsurgeryingrade2and3giantcelltumorsofbonearoundtheknee AT sharmadivyansh jointpreservationsurgeryingrade2and3giantcelltumorsofbonearoundtheknee |