Cargando…

Short-Latency Covert Saccades - The Explanation for Good Dynamic Visual Performance After Unilateral Vestibular Loss?

Background: Functional head impulse test (fHIT) tests the ability of the vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) to allow visual perception during head movements. Our previous study showed that active head movements to the side with a vestibular lesion generated a dynamic visual performance that were as good...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sjögren, Julia, Karlberg, Mikael, Hickson, Craig, Magnusson, Måns, Fransson, Per-Anders, Tjernström, Fredrik
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8439257/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34531814
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2021.695064
_version_ 1783752502723739648
author Sjögren, Julia
Karlberg, Mikael
Hickson, Craig
Magnusson, Måns
Fransson, Per-Anders
Tjernström, Fredrik
author_facet Sjögren, Julia
Karlberg, Mikael
Hickson, Craig
Magnusson, Måns
Fransson, Per-Anders
Tjernström, Fredrik
author_sort Sjögren, Julia
collection PubMed
description Background: Functional head impulse test (fHIT) tests the ability of the vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) to allow visual perception during head movements. Our previous study showed that active head movements to the side with a vestibular lesion generated a dynamic visual performance that were as good as during movements to the intact side. Objective: To examine the differences in eye position during the head impulse test when performed with active and passive head movements, in order to better understand the role of the different saccade properties in improving visual performance. Method: We recruited 8 subjects with complete unilateral vestibular loss (4 men and 4 women, mean age 47 years) and tested them with video Head Impulse Test (vHIT) and Functional Head Impulse Test (fHIT) during passive and active movements while looking at a target. We assessed the mean absolute position error of the eye during different time frames of the head movement, the peak latency and the peak velocity of the first saccade, as well as the visual performance during the head movement. Results: Active head impulses to the lesioned side generated dynamic visual performances that were as good as when testing the intact side. Active head impulses resulted in smaller position errors during the visual perception task (p = 0.006) compared to passive head-impulses and the position error during the visual perception time frame correlated with shorter latencies of the first saccade (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Actively generated head impulses toward the side with a complete vestibular loss resulted in a position error within or close to the margin necessary to obtain visual perception for a brief period of time in patients with chronic unilateral vestibular loss. This seems to be attributed to the appearance of short-latency covert saccades, which position the eyes in a more favorable position during head movements.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8439257
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84392572021-09-15 Short-Latency Covert Saccades - The Explanation for Good Dynamic Visual Performance After Unilateral Vestibular Loss? Sjögren, Julia Karlberg, Mikael Hickson, Craig Magnusson, Måns Fransson, Per-Anders Tjernström, Fredrik Front Neurol Neurology Background: Functional head impulse test (fHIT) tests the ability of the vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) to allow visual perception during head movements. Our previous study showed that active head movements to the side with a vestibular lesion generated a dynamic visual performance that were as good as during movements to the intact side. Objective: To examine the differences in eye position during the head impulse test when performed with active and passive head movements, in order to better understand the role of the different saccade properties in improving visual performance. Method: We recruited 8 subjects with complete unilateral vestibular loss (4 men and 4 women, mean age 47 years) and tested them with video Head Impulse Test (vHIT) and Functional Head Impulse Test (fHIT) during passive and active movements while looking at a target. We assessed the mean absolute position error of the eye during different time frames of the head movement, the peak latency and the peak velocity of the first saccade, as well as the visual performance during the head movement. Results: Active head impulses to the lesioned side generated dynamic visual performances that were as good as when testing the intact side. Active head impulses resulted in smaller position errors during the visual perception task (p = 0.006) compared to passive head-impulses and the position error during the visual perception time frame correlated with shorter latencies of the first saccade (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Actively generated head impulses toward the side with a complete vestibular loss resulted in a position error within or close to the margin necessary to obtain visual perception for a brief period of time in patients with chronic unilateral vestibular loss. This seems to be attributed to the appearance of short-latency covert saccades, which position the eyes in a more favorable position during head movements. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-08-31 /pmc/articles/PMC8439257/ /pubmed/34531814 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2021.695064 Text en Copyright © 2021 Sjögren, Karlberg, Hickson, Magnusson, Fransson and Tjernström. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neurology
Sjögren, Julia
Karlberg, Mikael
Hickson, Craig
Magnusson, Måns
Fransson, Per-Anders
Tjernström, Fredrik
Short-Latency Covert Saccades - The Explanation for Good Dynamic Visual Performance After Unilateral Vestibular Loss?
title Short-Latency Covert Saccades - The Explanation for Good Dynamic Visual Performance After Unilateral Vestibular Loss?
title_full Short-Latency Covert Saccades - The Explanation for Good Dynamic Visual Performance After Unilateral Vestibular Loss?
title_fullStr Short-Latency Covert Saccades - The Explanation for Good Dynamic Visual Performance After Unilateral Vestibular Loss?
title_full_unstemmed Short-Latency Covert Saccades - The Explanation for Good Dynamic Visual Performance After Unilateral Vestibular Loss?
title_short Short-Latency Covert Saccades - The Explanation for Good Dynamic Visual Performance After Unilateral Vestibular Loss?
title_sort short-latency covert saccades - the explanation for good dynamic visual performance after unilateral vestibular loss?
topic Neurology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8439257/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34531814
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2021.695064
work_keys_str_mv AT sjogrenjulia shortlatencycovertsaccadestheexplanationforgooddynamicvisualperformanceafterunilateralvestibularloss
AT karlbergmikael shortlatencycovertsaccadestheexplanationforgooddynamicvisualperformanceafterunilateralvestibularloss
AT hicksoncraig shortlatencycovertsaccadestheexplanationforgooddynamicvisualperformanceafterunilateralvestibularloss
AT magnussonmans shortlatencycovertsaccadestheexplanationforgooddynamicvisualperformanceafterunilateralvestibularloss
AT franssonperanders shortlatencycovertsaccadestheexplanationforgooddynamicvisualperformanceafterunilateralvestibularloss
AT tjernstromfredrik shortlatencycovertsaccadestheexplanationforgooddynamicvisualperformanceafterunilateralvestibularloss