Cargando…

High-flow nasal oxygen cannula vs. noninvasive mechanical ventilation to prevent reintubation in sepsis: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: High-flow nasal oxygen cannula (HFNC) and noninvasive mechanical ventilation (NIV) can prevent reintubation in critically ill patients. However, their efficacy in post-extubated sepsis patients remains unclear. The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy of HFNC vs. NIV to pr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tongyoo, Surat, Tantibundit, Porntipa, Daorattanachai, Kiattichai, Viarasilpa, Tanuwong, Permpikul, Chairat, Udompanturak, Suthipol
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8439370/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34523035
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13613-021-00922-5
_version_ 1783752512441942016
author Tongyoo, Surat
Tantibundit, Porntipa
Daorattanachai, Kiattichai
Viarasilpa, Tanuwong
Permpikul, Chairat
Udompanturak, Suthipol
author_facet Tongyoo, Surat
Tantibundit, Porntipa
Daorattanachai, Kiattichai
Viarasilpa, Tanuwong
Permpikul, Chairat
Udompanturak, Suthipol
author_sort Tongyoo, Surat
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: High-flow nasal oxygen cannula (HFNC) and noninvasive mechanical ventilation (NIV) can prevent reintubation in critically ill patients. However, their efficacy in post-extubated sepsis patients remains unclear. The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy of HFNC vs. NIV to prevent reintubation in post-extubated sepsis patients. METHODS: We conducted a single-centre, prospective, open-labelled, randomised controlled trial at the medical intensive care unit of Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand. Sepsis patients who had been intubated, recovered, and passed the spontaneous breathing trial were enrolled and randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either HFNC or NIV support immediately after extubation. The primary outcome was rate of reintubation at 72 h after extubation. RESULTS: Between 1st October 2017 and 31st October 2019, 222 patients were enrolled and 112 were assigned to the HFNC group and 110 to the NIV group. Both groups were well matched in baseline characteristics. The median [IQR] age of the HFNC group was 66 [50–77] vs. 65.5 [54–77] years in the NIV group. The most common causes of intubation at admission were shock-related respiratory failure (57.1% vs. 55.5%) and acute hypoxic respiratory failure (34.8% vs. 40.9%) in the HFNC and NIV groups, respectively. The duration of mechanical ventilation before extubation was 5 [3–8] days in the HFNC group vs. 5 [3–9] days in the NIV group. There was no statistically significant difference in the primary outcome: 20/112 (17.9%) in the HFNC group required reintubation at 72 h compared to 20/110 (18.2%) in the NIV group [relative risk (RR) 0.99: 95% confidence interval (CI) (0.70–1.39); P = 0.95]. The 28-day mortality was not different: 8/112 (7.1%) with HFNC vs. 10/110 (9.1%) with NIV (RR 0.88: 95% CI (0.57–1.37); P = 0.59). CONCLUSIONS: Among sepsis patients, there was no difference between HFNC and NIV in the prevention of reintubation at 72 h after extubation. Clinical Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03246893; Registered 11 August 2017; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03246893?term=surat+tongyoo&draw=2&rank=3 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13613-021-00922-5.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8439370
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84393702021-09-15 High-flow nasal oxygen cannula vs. noninvasive mechanical ventilation to prevent reintubation in sepsis: a randomized controlled trial Tongyoo, Surat Tantibundit, Porntipa Daorattanachai, Kiattichai Viarasilpa, Tanuwong Permpikul, Chairat Udompanturak, Suthipol Ann Intensive Care Research BACKGROUND: High-flow nasal oxygen cannula (HFNC) and noninvasive mechanical ventilation (NIV) can prevent reintubation in critically ill patients. However, their efficacy in post-extubated sepsis patients remains unclear. The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy of HFNC vs. NIV to prevent reintubation in post-extubated sepsis patients. METHODS: We conducted a single-centre, prospective, open-labelled, randomised controlled trial at the medical intensive care unit of Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand. Sepsis patients who had been intubated, recovered, and passed the spontaneous breathing trial were enrolled and randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either HFNC or NIV support immediately after extubation. The primary outcome was rate of reintubation at 72 h after extubation. RESULTS: Between 1st October 2017 and 31st October 2019, 222 patients were enrolled and 112 were assigned to the HFNC group and 110 to the NIV group. Both groups were well matched in baseline characteristics. The median [IQR] age of the HFNC group was 66 [50–77] vs. 65.5 [54–77] years in the NIV group. The most common causes of intubation at admission were shock-related respiratory failure (57.1% vs. 55.5%) and acute hypoxic respiratory failure (34.8% vs. 40.9%) in the HFNC and NIV groups, respectively. The duration of mechanical ventilation before extubation was 5 [3–8] days in the HFNC group vs. 5 [3–9] days in the NIV group. There was no statistically significant difference in the primary outcome: 20/112 (17.9%) in the HFNC group required reintubation at 72 h compared to 20/110 (18.2%) in the NIV group [relative risk (RR) 0.99: 95% confidence interval (CI) (0.70–1.39); P = 0.95]. The 28-day mortality was not different: 8/112 (7.1%) with HFNC vs. 10/110 (9.1%) with NIV (RR 0.88: 95% CI (0.57–1.37); P = 0.59). CONCLUSIONS: Among sepsis patients, there was no difference between HFNC and NIV in the prevention of reintubation at 72 h after extubation. Clinical Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03246893; Registered 11 August 2017; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03246893?term=surat+tongyoo&draw=2&rank=3 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13613-021-00922-5. Springer International Publishing 2021-09-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8439370/ /pubmed/34523035 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13613-021-00922-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Research
Tongyoo, Surat
Tantibundit, Porntipa
Daorattanachai, Kiattichai
Viarasilpa, Tanuwong
Permpikul, Chairat
Udompanturak, Suthipol
High-flow nasal oxygen cannula vs. noninvasive mechanical ventilation to prevent reintubation in sepsis: a randomized controlled trial
title High-flow nasal oxygen cannula vs. noninvasive mechanical ventilation to prevent reintubation in sepsis: a randomized controlled trial
title_full High-flow nasal oxygen cannula vs. noninvasive mechanical ventilation to prevent reintubation in sepsis: a randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr High-flow nasal oxygen cannula vs. noninvasive mechanical ventilation to prevent reintubation in sepsis: a randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed High-flow nasal oxygen cannula vs. noninvasive mechanical ventilation to prevent reintubation in sepsis: a randomized controlled trial
title_short High-flow nasal oxygen cannula vs. noninvasive mechanical ventilation to prevent reintubation in sepsis: a randomized controlled trial
title_sort high-flow nasal oxygen cannula vs. noninvasive mechanical ventilation to prevent reintubation in sepsis: a randomized controlled trial
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8439370/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34523035
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13613-021-00922-5
work_keys_str_mv AT tongyoosurat highflownasaloxygencannulavsnoninvasivemechanicalventilationtopreventreintubationinsepsisarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT tantibunditporntipa highflownasaloxygencannulavsnoninvasivemechanicalventilationtopreventreintubationinsepsisarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT daorattanachaikiattichai highflownasaloxygencannulavsnoninvasivemechanicalventilationtopreventreintubationinsepsisarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT viarasilpatanuwong highflownasaloxygencannulavsnoninvasivemechanicalventilationtopreventreintubationinsepsisarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT permpikulchairat highflownasaloxygencannulavsnoninvasivemechanicalventilationtopreventreintubationinsepsisarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT udompanturaksuthipol highflownasaloxygencannulavsnoninvasivemechanicalventilationtopreventreintubationinsepsisarandomizedcontrolledtrial