Cargando…
Payer Perspectives on Intravenous versus Subcutaneous Administration of Drugs
The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has brought increased attention to vulnerable populations such as older or immunocompromised patients and heightened the focus on alternatives to intravenous (IV) formulations, particularly those that may be administered in a non-clinical setting. Amo...
Autor principal: | Epstein, Robert S |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8439384/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34531668 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CEOR.S317687 |
Ejemplares similares
-
The socio-economical impact of intravenous (IV) versus subcutaneous (SC) administration of trastuzumab: future prospectives
por: Papadmitriou, K., et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Assessing the transition from intravenous to subcutaneous delivery of rituximab: Benefits for payers, health care professionals, and patients with lymphoma
por: Harvey, Michael J., et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Gaps in allergen immunotherapy administration and subcutaneous allergen immunotherapy dose adjustment schedules: Need for prospective data
por: Larenas-Linnemann, Désirée Erlinda, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
The Subcutaneous Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator: A Patient Perspective
por: Nesti, Martina, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Planning for the Post-COVID Syndrome: How Payers Can Mitigate Long-Term Complications of the Pandemic
por: Jiang, David H., et al.
Publicado: (2020)