Cargando…
Is it Necessary to Send Clinically Diagnosed Benign Skin and Subcutaneous Lesions Excised Under Local Anesthesia for Routine Histopathological Examination?
Background The common benign surgical lesions of skin and subcutaneous tissues like lipoma and sebaceous cysts are diagnosed clinically and treated by surgical excision under local anesthesia. The occurrence of malignancy in these lesions is extremely low, and routine histopathological examination (...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cureus
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8439399/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34540422 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.17194 |
_version_ | 1783752517836865536 |
---|---|
author | Milton, Cyril Joseph Ganesamoorthy, Karthika GS, Dharanya Kannan, Amudhan Vijayakumar, Chellappa Srinivas, Bheemanathi Hanuman Sundaramurthi, Sudharsanan |
author_facet | Milton, Cyril Joseph Ganesamoorthy, Karthika GS, Dharanya Kannan, Amudhan Vijayakumar, Chellappa Srinivas, Bheemanathi Hanuman Sundaramurthi, Sudharsanan |
author_sort | Milton, Cyril Joseph |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background The common benign surgical lesions of skin and subcutaneous tissues like lipoma and sebaceous cysts are diagnosed clinically and treated by surgical excision under local anesthesia. The occurrence of malignancy in these lesions is extremely low, and routine histopathological examination (HPE) adds to increased costs and workload on pathologists. This study was undertaken to estimate the clinical concordance and the frequency of malignancy in these lesions. Methods A total of 1,815 HPE reports of clinically benign skin and subcutaneous lesions excised under local anesthesia from January 2014 to December 2018 were studied. Results Lipoma (31.3%) and sebaceous cyst (29.9%) were the common clinical diagnosis in our study. The clinical accuracy in the diagnosis of lipoma was 88.6%, and for sebaceous cyst, it was 72.7%. There were six reports of malignancy in our study from the clinically diagnosed benign skin and subcutaneous lesions (0.33%). None of the cases of lipoma and the sebaceous cyst had a malignancy in the final histopathology report. The frequency of malignancy in the rest of the lesions is 0.85% (six out of 699 cases); (p-value: 0.003). Discussion In the absence of red flag signs, lesions like lipoma, sebaceous cyst, corn, and callus can be discarded without an HPE. We advocate routine HPE of other solid lesions, cystic lesions with solid areas, and pigmented or ulcerated lesions, as the clinical concordance is low and there is a significant occurrence of malignancy in these lesions. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8439399 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Cureus |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84393992021-09-16 Is it Necessary to Send Clinically Diagnosed Benign Skin and Subcutaneous Lesions Excised Under Local Anesthesia for Routine Histopathological Examination? Milton, Cyril Joseph Ganesamoorthy, Karthika GS, Dharanya Kannan, Amudhan Vijayakumar, Chellappa Srinivas, Bheemanathi Hanuman Sundaramurthi, Sudharsanan Cureus Dermatology Background The common benign surgical lesions of skin and subcutaneous tissues like lipoma and sebaceous cysts are diagnosed clinically and treated by surgical excision under local anesthesia. The occurrence of malignancy in these lesions is extremely low, and routine histopathological examination (HPE) adds to increased costs and workload on pathologists. This study was undertaken to estimate the clinical concordance and the frequency of malignancy in these lesions. Methods A total of 1,815 HPE reports of clinically benign skin and subcutaneous lesions excised under local anesthesia from January 2014 to December 2018 were studied. Results Lipoma (31.3%) and sebaceous cyst (29.9%) were the common clinical diagnosis in our study. The clinical accuracy in the diagnosis of lipoma was 88.6%, and for sebaceous cyst, it was 72.7%. There were six reports of malignancy in our study from the clinically diagnosed benign skin and subcutaneous lesions (0.33%). None of the cases of lipoma and the sebaceous cyst had a malignancy in the final histopathology report. The frequency of malignancy in the rest of the lesions is 0.85% (six out of 699 cases); (p-value: 0.003). Discussion In the absence of red flag signs, lesions like lipoma, sebaceous cyst, corn, and callus can be discarded without an HPE. We advocate routine HPE of other solid lesions, cystic lesions with solid areas, and pigmented or ulcerated lesions, as the clinical concordance is low and there is a significant occurrence of malignancy in these lesions. Cureus 2021-08-15 /pmc/articles/PMC8439399/ /pubmed/34540422 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.17194 Text en Copyright © 2021, Milton et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Dermatology Milton, Cyril Joseph Ganesamoorthy, Karthika GS, Dharanya Kannan, Amudhan Vijayakumar, Chellappa Srinivas, Bheemanathi Hanuman Sundaramurthi, Sudharsanan Is it Necessary to Send Clinically Diagnosed Benign Skin and Subcutaneous Lesions Excised Under Local Anesthesia for Routine Histopathological Examination? |
title | Is it Necessary to Send Clinically Diagnosed Benign Skin and Subcutaneous Lesions Excised Under Local Anesthesia for Routine Histopathological Examination? |
title_full | Is it Necessary to Send Clinically Diagnosed Benign Skin and Subcutaneous Lesions Excised Under Local Anesthesia for Routine Histopathological Examination? |
title_fullStr | Is it Necessary to Send Clinically Diagnosed Benign Skin and Subcutaneous Lesions Excised Under Local Anesthesia for Routine Histopathological Examination? |
title_full_unstemmed | Is it Necessary to Send Clinically Diagnosed Benign Skin and Subcutaneous Lesions Excised Under Local Anesthesia for Routine Histopathological Examination? |
title_short | Is it Necessary to Send Clinically Diagnosed Benign Skin and Subcutaneous Lesions Excised Under Local Anesthesia for Routine Histopathological Examination? |
title_sort | is it necessary to send clinically diagnosed benign skin and subcutaneous lesions excised under local anesthesia for routine histopathological examination? |
topic | Dermatology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8439399/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34540422 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.17194 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT miltoncyriljoseph isitnecessarytosendclinicallydiagnosedbenignskinandsubcutaneouslesionsexcisedunderlocalanesthesiaforroutinehistopathologicalexamination AT ganesamoorthykarthika isitnecessarytosendclinicallydiagnosedbenignskinandsubcutaneouslesionsexcisedunderlocalanesthesiaforroutinehistopathologicalexamination AT gsdharanya isitnecessarytosendclinicallydiagnosedbenignskinandsubcutaneouslesionsexcisedunderlocalanesthesiaforroutinehistopathologicalexamination AT kannanamudhan isitnecessarytosendclinicallydiagnosedbenignskinandsubcutaneouslesionsexcisedunderlocalanesthesiaforroutinehistopathologicalexamination AT vijayakumarchellappa isitnecessarytosendclinicallydiagnosedbenignskinandsubcutaneouslesionsexcisedunderlocalanesthesiaforroutinehistopathologicalexamination AT srinivasbheemanathihanuman isitnecessarytosendclinicallydiagnosedbenignskinandsubcutaneouslesionsexcisedunderlocalanesthesiaforroutinehistopathologicalexamination AT sundaramurthisudharsanan isitnecessarytosendclinicallydiagnosedbenignskinandsubcutaneouslesionsexcisedunderlocalanesthesiaforroutinehistopathologicalexamination |