Cargando…

Design of Clinical Trials Evaluating Sedation in Critically Ill Adults Undergoing Mechanical Ventilation: Recommendations From Sedation Consortium on Endpoints and Procedures for Treatment, Education, and Research (SCEPTER) Recommendation III

OBJECTIVES: Clinical trials evaluating the safety and effectiveness of sedative medication use in critically ill adults undergoing mechanical ventilation differ considerably in their methodological approach. This heterogeneity impedes the ability to compare results across studies. The Sedation Conso...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ward, Denham S., Absalom, Anthony R., Aitken, Leanne M., Balas, Michele C., Brown, David L., Burry, Lisa, Colantuoni, Elizabeth, Coursin, Douglas, Devlin, John W., Dexter, Franklin, Dworkin, Robert H., Egan, Talmage D., Elliott, Doug, Egerod, Ingrid, Flood, Pamela, Fraser, Gilles L., Girard, Timothy D., Gozal, David, Hopkins, Ramona O., Kress, John, Maze, Mervyn, Needham, Dale M., Pandharipande, Pratik, Riker, Richard, Sessler, Daniel I., Shafer, Steven L., Shehabi, Yahya, Spies, Claudia, Sun, Lena S., Tung, Avery, Urman, Richard D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8439670/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33938718
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000005049
_version_ 1783752555000496128
author Ward, Denham S.
Absalom, Anthony R.
Aitken, Leanne M.
Balas, Michele C.
Brown, David L.
Burry, Lisa
Colantuoni, Elizabeth
Coursin, Douglas
Devlin, John W.
Dexter, Franklin
Dworkin, Robert H.
Egan, Talmage D.
Elliott, Doug
Egerod, Ingrid
Flood, Pamela
Fraser, Gilles L.
Girard, Timothy D.
Gozal, David
Hopkins, Ramona O.
Kress, John
Maze, Mervyn
Needham, Dale M.
Pandharipande, Pratik
Riker, Richard
Sessler, Daniel I.
Shafer, Steven L.
Shehabi, Yahya
Spies, Claudia
Sun, Lena S.
Tung, Avery
Urman, Richard D.
author_facet Ward, Denham S.
Absalom, Anthony R.
Aitken, Leanne M.
Balas, Michele C.
Brown, David L.
Burry, Lisa
Colantuoni, Elizabeth
Coursin, Douglas
Devlin, John W.
Dexter, Franklin
Dworkin, Robert H.
Egan, Talmage D.
Elliott, Doug
Egerod, Ingrid
Flood, Pamela
Fraser, Gilles L.
Girard, Timothy D.
Gozal, David
Hopkins, Ramona O.
Kress, John
Maze, Mervyn
Needham, Dale M.
Pandharipande, Pratik
Riker, Richard
Sessler, Daniel I.
Shafer, Steven L.
Shehabi, Yahya
Spies, Claudia
Sun, Lena S.
Tung, Avery
Urman, Richard D.
author_sort Ward, Denham S.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Clinical trials evaluating the safety and effectiveness of sedative medication use in critically ill adults undergoing mechanical ventilation differ considerably in their methodological approach. This heterogeneity impedes the ability to compare results across studies. The Sedation Consortium on Endpoints and Procedures for Treatment, Education, and Research Recommendations convened a meeting of multidisciplinary experts to develop recommendations for key methodologic elements of sedation trials in the ICU to help guide academic and industry clinical investigators. DESIGN: A 2-day in-person meeting was held in Washington, DC, on March 28–29, 2019, followed by a three-round, online modified Delphi consensus process. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty-six participants from academia, industry, and the Food and Drug Administration with expertise in relevant content areas, including two former ICU patients attended the in-person meeting, and the majority completed an online follow-up survey and participated in the modified Delphi process. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The final recommendations were iteratively refined based on the survey results, participants’ reactions to those results, summaries written by panel moderators, and a review of the meeting transcripts made from audio recordings. Fifteen recommendations were developed for study design and conduct, subject enrollment, outcomes, and measurement instruments. Consensus recommendations included obtaining input from ICU survivors and/or their families, ensuring adequate training for personnel using validated instruments for assessments of sedation, pain, and delirium in the ICU environment, and the need for methodological standardization. CONCLUSIONS: These recommendations are intended to assist researchers in the design, conduct, selection of endpoints, and reporting of clinical trials involving sedative medications and/or sedation protocols for adult ICU patients who require mechanical ventilation. These recommendations should be viewed as a starting point to improve clinical trials and help reduce methodological heterogeneity in future clinical trials.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8439670
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84396702021-09-20 Design of Clinical Trials Evaluating Sedation in Critically Ill Adults Undergoing Mechanical Ventilation: Recommendations From Sedation Consortium on Endpoints and Procedures for Treatment, Education, and Research (SCEPTER) Recommendation III Ward, Denham S. Absalom, Anthony R. Aitken, Leanne M. Balas, Michele C. Brown, David L. Burry, Lisa Colantuoni, Elizabeth Coursin, Douglas Devlin, John W. Dexter, Franklin Dworkin, Robert H. Egan, Talmage D. Elliott, Doug Egerod, Ingrid Flood, Pamela Fraser, Gilles L. Girard, Timothy D. Gozal, David Hopkins, Ramona O. Kress, John Maze, Mervyn Needham, Dale M. Pandharipande, Pratik Riker, Richard Sessler, Daniel I. Shafer, Steven L. Shehabi, Yahya Spies, Claudia Sun, Lena S. Tung, Avery Urman, Richard D. Crit Care Med Clinical Investigations OBJECTIVES: Clinical trials evaluating the safety and effectiveness of sedative medication use in critically ill adults undergoing mechanical ventilation differ considerably in their methodological approach. This heterogeneity impedes the ability to compare results across studies. The Sedation Consortium on Endpoints and Procedures for Treatment, Education, and Research Recommendations convened a meeting of multidisciplinary experts to develop recommendations for key methodologic elements of sedation trials in the ICU to help guide academic and industry clinical investigators. DESIGN: A 2-day in-person meeting was held in Washington, DC, on March 28–29, 2019, followed by a three-round, online modified Delphi consensus process. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty-six participants from academia, industry, and the Food and Drug Administration with expertise in relevant content areas, including two former ICU patients attended the in-person meeting, and the majority completed an online follow-up survey and participated in the modified Delphi process. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The final recommendations were iteratively refined based on the survey results, participants’ reactions to those results, summaries written by panel moderators, and a review of the meeting transcripts made from audio recordings. Fifteen recommendations were developed for study design and conduct, subject enrollment, outcomes, and measurement instruments. Consensus recommendations included obtaining input from ICU survivors and/or their families, ensuring adequate training for personnel using validated instruments for assessments of sedation, pain, and delirium in the ICU environment, and the need for methodological standardization. CONCLUSIONS: These recommendations are intended to assist researchers in the design, conduct, selection of endpoints, and reporting of clinical trials involving sedative medications and/or sedation protocols for adult ICU patients who require mechanical ventilation. These recommendations should be viewed as a starting point to improve clinical trials and help reduce methodological heterogeneity in future clinical trials. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021-04-29 2021-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8439670/ /pubmed/33938718 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000005049 Text en Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Clinical Investigations
Ward, Denham S.
Absalom, Anthony R.
Aitken, Leanne M.
Balas, Michele C.
Brown, David L.
Burry, Lisa
Colantuoni, Elizabeth
Coursin, Douglas
Devlin, John W.
Dexter, Franklin
Dworkin, Robert H.
Egan, Talmage D.
Elliott, Doug
Egerod, Ingrid
Flood, Pamela
Fraser, Gilles L.
Girard, Timothy D.
Gozal, David
Hopkins, Ramona O.
Kress, John
Maze, Mervyn
Needham, Dale M.
Pandharipande, Pratik
Riker, Richard
Sessler, Daniel I.
Shafer, Steven L.
Shehabi, Yahya
Spies, Claudia
Sun, Lena S.
Tung, Avery
Urman, Richard D.
Design of Clinical Trials Evaluating Sedation in Critically Ill Adults Undergoing Mechanical Ventilation: Recommendations From Sedation Consortium on Endpoints and Procedures for Treatment, Education, and Research (SCEPTER) Recommendation III
title Design of Clinical Trials Evaluating Sedation in Critically Ill Adults Undergoing Mechanical Ventilation: Recommendations From Sedation Consortium on Endpoints and Procedures for Treatment, Education, and Research (SCEPTER) Recommendation III
title_full Design of Clinical Trials Evaluating Sedation in Critically Ill Adults Undergoing Mechanical Ventilation: Recommendations From Sedation Consortium on Endpoints and Procedures for Treatment, Education, and Research (SCEPTER) Recommendation III
title_fullStr Design of Clinical Trials Evaluating Sedation in Critically Ill Adults Undergoing Mechanical Ventilation: Recommendations From Sedation Consortium on Endpoints and Procedures for Treatment, Education, and Research (SCEPTER) Recommendation III
title_full_unstemmed Design of Clinical Trials Evaluating Sedation in Critically Ill Adults Undergoing Mechanical Ventilation: Recommendations From Sedation Consortium on Endpoints and Procedures for Treatment, Education, and Research (SCEPTER) Recommendation III
title_short Design of Clinical Trials Evaluating Sedation in Critically Ill Adults Undergoing Mechanical Ventilation: Recommendations From Sedation Consortium on Endpoints and Procedures for Treatment, Education, and Research (SCEPTER) Recommendation III
title_sort design of clinical trials evaluating sedation in critically ill adults undergoing mechanical ventilation: recommendations from sedation consortium on endpoints and procedures for treatment, education, and research (scepter) recommendation iii
topic Clinical Investigations
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8439670/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33938718
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000005049
work_keys_str_mv AT warddenhams designofclinicaltrialsevaluatingsedationincriticallyilladultsundergoingmechanicalventilationrecommendationsfromsedationconsortiumonendpointsandproceduresfortreatmenteducationandresearchscepterrecommendationiii
AT absalomanthonyr designofclinicaltrialsevaluatingsedationincriticallyilladultsundergoingmechanicalventilationrecommendationsfromsedationconsortiumonendpointsandproceduresfortreatmenteducationandresearchscepterrecommendationiii
AT aitkenleannem designofclinicaltrialsevaluatingsedationincriticallyilladultsundergoingmechanicalventilationrecommendationsfromsedationconsortiumonendpointsandproceduresfortreatmenteducationandresearchscepterrecommendationiii
AT balasmichelec designofclinicaltrialsevaluatingsedationincriticallyilladultsundergoingmechanicalventilationrecommendationsfromsedationconsortiumonendpointsandproceduresfortreatmenteducationandresearchscepterrecommendationiii
AT browndavidl designofclinicaltrialsevaluatingsedationincriticallyilladultsundergoingmechanicalventilationrecommendationsfromsedationconsortiumonendpointsandproceduresfortreatmenteducationandresearchscepterrecommendationiii
AT burrylisa designofclinicaltrialsevaluatingsedationincriticallyilladultsundergoingmechanicalventilationrecommendationsfromsedationconsortiumonendpointsandproceduresfortreatmenteducationandresearchscepterrecommendationiii
AT colantuonielizabeth designofclinicaltrialsevaluatingsedationincriticallyilladultsundergoingmechanicalventilationrecommendationsfromsedationconsortiumonendpointsandproceduresfortreatmenteducationandresearchscepterrecommendationiii
AT coursindouglas designofclinicaltrialsevaluatingsedationincriticallyilladultsundergoingmechanicalventilationrecommendationsfromsedationconsortiumonendpointsandproceduresfortreatmenteducationandresearchscepterrecommendationiii
AT devlinjohnw designofclinicaltrialsevaluatingsedationincriticallyilladultsundergoingmechanicalventilationrecommendationsfromsedationconsortiumonendpointsandproceduresfortreatmenteducationandresearchscepterrecommendationiii
AT dexterfranklin designofclinicaltrialsevaluatingsedationincriticallyilladultsundergoingmechanicalventilationrecommendationsfromsedationconsortiumonendpointsandproceduresfortreatmenteducationandresearchscepterrecommendationiii
AT dworkinroberth designofclinicaltrialsevaluatingsedationincriticallyilladultsundergoingmechanicalventilationrecommendationsfromsedationconsortiumonendpointsandproceduresfortreatmenteducationandresearchscepterrecommendationiii
AT egantalmaged designofclinicaltrialsevaluatingsedationincriticallyilladultsundergoingmechanicalventilationrecommendationsfromsedationconsortiumonendpointsandproceduresfortreatmenteducationandresearchscepterrecommendationiii
AT elliottdoug designofclinicaltrialsevaluatingsedationincriticallyilladultsundergoingmechanicalventilationrecommendationsfromsedationconsortiumonendpointsandproceduresfortreatmenteducationandresearchscepterrecommendationiii
AT egerodingrid designofclinicaltrialsevaluatingsedationincriticallyilladultsundergoingmechanicalventilationrecommendationsfromsedationconsortiumonendpointsandproceduresfortreatmenteducationandresearchscepterrecommendationiii
AT floodpamela designofclinicaltrialsevaluatingsedationincriticallyilladultsundergoingmechanicalventilationrecommendationsfromsedationconsortiumonendpointsandproceduresfortreatmenteducationandresearchscepterrecommendationiii
AT frasergillesl designofclinicaltrialsevaluatingsedationincriticallyilladultsundergoingmechanicalventilationrecommendationsfromsedationconsortiumonendpointsandproceduresfortreatmenteducationandresearchscepterrecommendationiii
AT girardtimothyd designofclinicaltrialsevaluatingsedationincriticallyilladultsundergoingmechanicalventilationrecommendationsfromsedationconsortiumonendpointsandproceduresfortreatmenteducationandresearchscepterrecommendationiii
AT gozaldavid designofclinicaltrialsevaluatingsedationincriticallyilladultsundergoingmechanicalventilationrecommendationsfromsedationconsortiumonendpointsandproceduresfortreatmenteducationandresearchscepterrecommendationiii
AT hopkinsramonao designofclinicaltrialsevaluatingsedationincriticallyilladultsundergoingmechanicalventilationrecommendationsfromsedationconsortiumonendpointsandproceduresfortreatmenteducationandresearchscepterrecommendationiii
AT kressjohn designofclinicaltrialsevaluatingsedationincriticallyilladultsundergoingmechanicalventilationrecommendationsfromsedationconsortiumonendpointsandproceduresfortreatmenteducationandresearchscepterrecommendationiii
AT mazemervyn designofclinicaltrialsevaluatingsedationincriticallyilladultsundergoingmechanicalventilationrecommendationsfromsedationconsortiumonendpointsandproceduresfortreatmenteducationandresearchscepterrecommendationiii
AT needhamdalem designofclinicaltrialsevaluatingsedationincriticallyilladultsundergoingmechanicalventilationrecommendationsfromsedationconsortiumonendpointsandproceduresfortreatmenteducationandresearchscepterrecommendationiii
AT pandharipandepratik designofclinicaltrialsevaluatingsedationincriticallyilladultsundergoingmechanicalventilationrecommendationsfromsedationconsortiumonendpointsandproceduresfortreatmenteducationandresearchscepterrecommendationiii
AT rikerrichard designofclinicaltrialsevaluatingsedationincriticallyilladultsundergoingmechanicalventilationrecommendationsfromsedationconsortiumonendpointsandproceduresfortreatmenteducationandresearchscepterrecommendationiii
AT sesslerdanieli designofclinicaltrialsevaluatingsedationincriticallyilladultsundergoingmechanicalventilationrecommendationsfromsedationconsortiumonendpointsandproceduresfortreatmenteducationandresearchscepterrecommendationiii
AT shaferstevenl designofclinicaltrialsevaluatingsedationincriticallyilladultsundergoingmechanicalventilationrecommendationsfromsedationconsortiumonendpointsandproceduresfortreatmenteducationandresearchscepterrecommendationiii
AT shehabiyahya designofclinicaltrialsevaluatingsedationincriticallyilladultsundergoingmechanicalventilationrecommendationsfromsedationconsortiumonendpointsandproceduresfortreatmenteducationandresearchscepterrecommendationiii
AT spiesclaudia designofclinicaltrialsevaluatingsedationincriticallyilladultsundergoingmechanicalventilationrecommendationsfromsedationconsortiumonendpointsandproceduresfortreatmenteducationandresearchscepterrecommendationiii
AT sunlenas designofclinicaltrialsevaluatingsedationincriticallyilladultsundergoingmechanicalventilationrecommendationsfromsedationconsortiumonendpointsandproceduresfortreatmenteducationandresearchscepterrecommendationiii
AT tungavery designofclinicaltrialsevaluatingsedationincriticallyilladultsundergoingmechanicalventilationrecommendationsfromsedationconsortiumonendpointsandproceduresfortreatmenteducationandresearchscepterrecommendationiii
AT urmanrichardd designofclinicaltrialsevaluatingsedationincriticallyilladultsundergoingmechanicalventilationrecommendationsfromsedationconsortiumonendpointsandproceduresfortreatmenteducationandresearchscepterrecommendationiii