Cargando…
Auditory selective attention under working memory load
Can cognitive load enhance concentration on task-relevant information and help filter out distractors? Most of the prior research in the area of selective attention has focused on visual attention or cross-modal distraction and has yielded controversial results. Here, we studied whether working memo...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8440250/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33146781 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00426-020-01437-7 |
_version_ | 1783752670772723712 |
---|---|
author | Bayramova, Rena Toffalini, Enrico Bonato, Mario Grassi, Massimo |
author_facet | Bayramova, Rena Toffalini, Enrico Bonato, Mario Grassi, Massimo |
author_sort | Bayramova, Rena |
collection | PubMed |
description | Can cognitive load enhance concentration on task-relevant information and help filter out distractors? Most of the prior research in the area of selective attention has focused on visual attention or cross-modal distraction and has yielded controversial results. Here, we studied whether working memory load can facilitate selective attention when both target and distractor stimuli are auditory. We used a letter n-back task with four levels of working memory load and two levels of distraction: congruent and incongruent distractors. This combination of updating and inhibition tasks allowed us to manipulate working memory load within the selective attention task. Participants sat in front of three loudspeakers and were asked to attend to the letter presented from the central loudspeaker while ignoring that presented from the flanking ones (spoken by a different person), which could be the same letter as the central one (congruent) or a different (incongruent) letter. Their task was to respond whether or not the central letter matched the letter presented n (0, 1, 2, or 3) trials back. Distraction was measured in terms of the difference in reaction time and accuracy on trials with incongruent versus congruent flankers. We found reduced interference from incongruent flankers in 2- and 3-back conditions compared to 0- and 1-back conditions, whereby higher working memory load almost negated the effect of incongruent flankers. These results suggest that high load on verbal working memory can facilitate inhibition of distractors in the auditory domain rather than make it more difficult as sometimes claimed. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00426-020-01437-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8440250 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84402502021-09-29 Auditory selective attention under working memory load Bayramova, Rena Toffalini, Enrico Bonato, Mario Grassi, Massimo Psychol Res Original Article Can cognitive load enhance concentration on task-relevant information and help filter out distractors? Most of the prior research in the area of selective attention has focused on visual attention or cross-modal distraction and has yielded controversial results. Here, we studied whether working memory load can facilitate selective attention when both target and distractor stimuli are auditory. We used a letter n-back task with four levels of working memory load and two levels of distraction: congruent and incongruent distractors. This combination of updating and inhibition tasks allowed us to manipulate working memory load within the selective attention task. Participants sat in front of three loudspeakers and were asked to attend to the letter presented from the central loudspeaker while ignoring that presented from the flanking ones (spoken by a different person), which could be the same letter as the central one (congruent) or a different (incongruent) letter. Their task was to respond whether or not the central letter matched the letter presented n (0, 1, 2, or 3) trials back. Distraction was measured in terms of the difference in reaction time and accuracy on trials with incongruent versus congruent flankers. We found reduced interference from incongruent flankers in 2- and 3-back conditions compared to 0- and 1-back conditions, whereby higher working memory load almost negated the effect of incongruent flankers. These results suggest that high load on verbal working memory can facilitate inhibition of distractors in the auditory domain rather than make it more difficult as sometimes claimed. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00426-020-01437-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-11-04 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8440250/ /pubmed/33146781 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00426-020-01437-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Bayramova, Rena Toffalini, Enrico Bonato, Mario Grassi, Massimo Auditory selective attention under working memory load |
title | Auditory selective attention under working memory load |
title_full | Auditory selective attention under working memory load |
title_fullStr | Auditory selective attention under working memory load |
title_full_unstemmed | Auditory selective attention under working memory load |
title_short | Auditory selective attention under working memory load |
title_sort | auditory selective attention under working memory load |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8440250/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33146781 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00426-020-01437-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bayramovarena auditoryselectiveattentionunderworkingmemoryload AT toffalinienrico auditoryselectiveattentionunderworkingmemoryload AT bonatomario auditoryselectiveattentionunderworkingmemoryload AT grassimassimo auditoryselectiveattentionunderworkingmemoryload |