Cargando…
Bumblebee electric charge stimulates floral volatile emissions in Petunia integrifolia but not in Antirrhinum majus
The timing of volatile organic compound (VOC) emission by flowering plants often coincides with pollinator foraging activity. Volatile emission is often considered to be paced by environmental variables, such as light intensity, and/or by circadian rhythmicity. The question arises as to what extent...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8440258/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34519874 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00114-021-01740-2 |
_version_ | 1783752672649674752 |
---|---|
author | Montgomery, Clara Vuts, Jozsef Woodcock, Christine M. Withall, David M. Birkett, Michael A. Pickett, John A. Robert, Daniel |
author_facet | Montgomery, Clara Vuts, Jozsef Woodcock, Christine M. Withall, David M. Birkett, Michael A. Pickett, John A. Robert, Daniel |
author_sort | Montgomery, Clara |
collection | PubMed |
description | The timing of volatile organic compound (VOC) emission by flowering plants often coincides with pollinator foraging activity. Volatile emission is often considered to be paced by environmental variables, such as light intensity, and/or by circadian rhythmicity. The question arises as to what extent pollinators themselves provide information about their presence, in keeping with their long co-evolution with flowering plants. Bumblebees are electrically charged and provide electrical stimulation when visiting plants, as measured via the depolarisation of electric potential in the stem of flowers. Here we test the hypothesis that the electric charge of foraging bumblebees increases the floral volatile emissions of bee pollinated plants. We investigate the change in VOC emissions of two bee-pollinated plants (Petunia integrifolia and Antirrhinum majus) exposed to the electric charge typical of foraging bumblebees. P. integrifolia slightly increases its emissions of a behaviorally and physiologically active compound in response to visits by foraging bumblebees, presenting on average 121 pC of electric charge. We show that for P. integrifolia, strong electrical stimulation (600–700 pC) promotes increased volatile emissions, but this is not found when using weaker electrical charges more representative of flying pollinators (100 pC). Floral volatile emissions of A. majus were not affected by either strong (600–700 pC) or weak electric charges (100 pC). This study opens a new area of research whereby the electrical charge of flying insects may provide information to plants on the presence and phenology of their pollinators. As a form of electroreception, this sensory process would bear adaptive value, enabling plants to better ensure that their attractive chemical messages are released when a potential recipient is present. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00114-021-01740-2. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8440258 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84402582021-09-29 Bumblebee electric charge stimulates floral volatile emissions in Petunia integrifolia but not in Antirrhinum majus Montgomery, Clara Vuts, Jozsef Woodcock, Christine M. Withall, David M. Birkett, Michael A. Pickett, John A. Robert, Daniel Naturwissenschaften Original Article The timing of volatile organic compound (VOC) emission by flowering plants often coincides with pollinator foraging activity. Volatile emission is often considered to be paced by environmental variables, such as light intensity, and/or by circadian rhythmicity. The question arises as to what extent pollinators themselves provide information about their presence, in keeping with their long co-evolution with flowering plants. Bumblebees are electrically charged and provide electrical stimulation when visiting plants, as measured via the depolarisation of electric potential in the stem of flowers. Here we test the hypothesis that the electric charge of foraging bumblebees increases the floral volatile emissions of bee pollinated plants. We investigate the change in VOC emissions of two bee-pollinated plants (Petunia integrifolia and Antirrhinum majus) exposed to the electric charge typical of foraging bumblebees. P. integrifolia slightly increases its emissions of a behaviorally and physiologically active compound in response to visits by foraging bumblebees, presenting on average 121 pC of electric charge. We show that for P. integrifolia, strong electrical stimulation (600–700 pC) promotes increased volatile emissions, but this is not found when using weaker electrical charges more representative of flying pollinators (100 pC). Floral volatile emissions of A. majus were not affected by either strong (600–700 pC) or weak electric charges (100 pC). This study opens a new area of research whereby the electrical charge of flying insects may provide information to plants on the presence and phenology of their pollinators. As a form of electroreception, this sensory process would bear adaptive value, enabling plants to better ensure that their attractive chemical messages are released when a potential recipient is present. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00114-021-01740-2. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-09-14 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8440258/ /pubmed/34519874 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00114-021-01740-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Montgomery, Clara Vuts, Jozsef Woodcock, Christine M. Withall, David M. Birkett, Michael A. Pickett, John A. Robert, Daniel Bumblebee electric charge stimulates floral volatile emissions in Petunia integrifolia but not in Antirrhinum majus |
title | Bumblebee electric charge stimulates floral volatile emissions in Petunia integrifolia but not in Antirrhinum majus |
title_full | Bumblebee electric charge stimulates floral volatile emissions in Petunia integrifolia but not in Antirrhinum majus |
title_fullStr | Bumblebee electric charge stimulates floral volatile emissions in Petunia integrifolia but not in Antirrhinum majus |
title_full_unstemmed | Bumblebee electric charge stimulates floral volatile emissions in Petunia integrifolia but not in Antirrhinum majus |
title_short | Bumblebee electric charge stimulates floral volatile emissions in Petunia integrifolia but not in Antirrhinum majus |
title_sort | bumblebee electric charge stimulates floral volatile emissions in petunia integrifolia but not in antirrhinum majus |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8440258/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34519874 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00114-021-01740-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT montgomeryclara bumblebeeelectricchargestimulatesfloralvolatileemissionsinpetuniaintegrifoliabutnotinantirrhinummajus AT vutsjozsef bumblebeeelectricchargestimulatesfloralvolatileemissionsinpetuniaintegrifoliabutnotinantirrhinummajus AT woodcockchristinem bumblebeeelectricchargestimulatesfloralvolatileemissionsinpetuniaintegrifoliabutnotinantirrhinummajus AT withalldavidm bumblebeeelectricchargestimulatesfloralvolatileemissionsinpetuniaintegrifoliabutnotinantirrhinummajus AT birkettmichaela bumblebeeelectricchargestimulatesfloralvolatileemissionsinpetuniaintegrifoliabutnotinantirrhinummajus AT pickettjohna bumblebeeelectricchargestimulatesfloralvolatileemissionsinpetuniaintegrifoliabutnotinantirrhinummajus AT robertdaniel bumblebeeelectricchargestimulatesfloralvolatileemissionsinpetuniaintegrifoliabutnotinantirrhinummajus |