Cargando…
An active tethering mechanism controls the fate of vesicles
Vesicle tethers are thought to underpin the efficiency of intracellular fusion by bridging vesicles to their target membranes. However, the interplay between tethering and fusion has remained enigmatic. Here, through optogenetic control of either a natural tether—the exocyst complex—or an artificial...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8440521/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34521845 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-25465-y |
_version_ | 1783752693295087616 |
---|---|
author | An, Seong J. Rivera-Molina, Felix Anneken, Alexander Xi, Zhiqun McNellis, Brian Polejaev, Vladimir I. Toomre, Derek |
author_facet | An, Seong J. Rivera-Molina, Felix Anneken, Alexander Xi, Zhiqun McNellis, Brian Polejaev, Vladimir I. Toomre, Derek |
author_sort | An, Seong J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Vesicle tethers are thought to underpin the efficiency of intracellular fusion by bridging vesicles to their target membranes. However, the interplay between tethering and fusion has remained enigmatic. Here, through optogenetic control of either a natural tether—the exocyst complex—or an artificial tether, we report that tethering regulates the mode of fusion. We find that vesicles mainly undergo kiss-and-run instead of full fusion in the absence of functional exocyst. Full fusion is rescued by optogenetically restoring exocyst function, in a manner likely dependent on the stoichiometry of tether engagement with the plasma membrane. In contrast, a passive artificial tether produces mostly kissing events, suggesting that kiss-and-run is the default mode of vesicle fusion. Optogenetic control of tethering further shows that fusion mode has physiological relevance since only full fusion could trigger lamellipodial expansion. These findings demonstrate that active coupling between tethering and fusion is critical for robust membrane merger. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8440521 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84405212021-10-04 An active tethering mechanism controls the fate of vesicles An, Seong J. Rivera-Molina, Felix Anneken, Alexander Xi, Zhiqun McNellis, Brian Polejaev, Vladimir I. Toomre, Derek Nat Commun Article Vesicle tethers are thought to underpin the efficiency of intracellular fusion by bridging vesicles to their target membranes. However, the interplay between tethering and fusion has remained enigmatic. Here, through optogenetic control of either a natural tether—the exocyst complex—or an artificial tether, we report that tethering regulates the mode of fusion. We find that vesicles mainly undergo kiss-and-run instead of full fusion in the absence of functional exocyst. Full fusion is rescued by optogenetically restoring exocyst function, in a manner likely dependent on the stoichiometry of tether engagement with the plasma membrane. In contrast, a passive artificial tether produces mostly kissing events, suggesting that kiss-and-run is the default mode of vesicle fusion. Optogenetic control of tethering further shows that fusion mode has physiological relevance since only full fusion could trigger lamellipodial expansion. These findings demonstrate that active coupling between tethering and fusion is critical for robust membrane merger. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-09-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8440521/ /pubmed/34521845 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-25465-y Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article An, Seong J. Rivera-Molina, Felix Anneken, Alexander Xi, Zhiqun McNellis, Brian Polejaev, Vladimir I. Toomre, Derek An active tethering mechanism controls the fate of vesicles |
title | An active tethering mechanism controls the fate of vesicles |
title_full | An active tethering mechanism controls the fate of vesicles |
title_fullStr | An active tethering mechanism controls the fate of vesicles |
title_full_unstemmed | An active tethering mechanism controls the fate of vesicles |
title_short | An active tethering mechanism controls the fate of vesicles |
title_sort | active tethering mechanism controls the fate of vesicles |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8440521/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34521845 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-25465-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT anseongj anactivetetheringmechanismcontrolsthefateofvesicles AT riveramolinafelix anactivetetheringmechanismcontrolsthefateofvesicles AT annekenalexander anactivetetheringmechanismcontrolsthefateofvesicles AT xizhiqun anactivetetheringmechanismcontrolsthefateofvesicles AT mcnellisbrian anactivetetheringmechanismcontrolsthefateofvesicles AT polejaevvladimiri anactivetetheringmechanismcontrolsthefateofvesicles AT toomrederek anactivetetheringmechanismcontrolsthefateofvesicles AT anseongj activetetheringmechanismcontrolsthefateofvesicles AT riveramolinafelix activetetheringmechanismcontrolsthefateofvesicles AT annekenalexander activetetheringmechanismcontrolsthefateofvesicles AT xizhiqun activetetheringmechanismcontrolsthefateofvesicles AT mcnellisbrian activetetheringmechanismcontrolsthefateofvesicles AT polejaevvladimiri activetetheringmechanismcontrolsthefateofvesicles AT toomrederek activetetheringmechanismcontrolsthefateofvesicles |