Cargando…
Optimal Positive End Expiratory Pressure Levels in Ventilated Patients Without Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials
Background: To find the optimal positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP) in mechanical ventilated patients without Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS), we conducted a Bayesian network meta-analysis and systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing different level of PEEP b...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8440859/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34540872 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2021.730018 |
_version_ | 1783752754098864128 |
---|---|
author | Zhou, Jing Lin, Zhimin Deng, Xiumei Liu, Baiyun Zhang, Yu Zheng, Yongxin Zheng, Haichong Wang, Yingzhi Lai, Yan Huang, Weixiang Liu, Xiaoqing He, Weiqun Xu, Yuanda Li, Yimin Huang, Yongbo Sang, Ling |
author_facet | Zhou, Jing Lin, Zhimin Deng, Xiumei Liu, Baiyun Zhang, Yu Zheng, Yongxin Zheng, Haichong Wang, Yingzhi Lai, Yan Huang, Weixiang Liu, Xiaoqing He, Weiqun Xu, Yuanda Li, Yimin Huang, Yongbo Sang, Ling |
author_sort | Zhou, Jing |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: To find the optimal positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP) in mechanical ventilated patients without Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS), we conducted a Bayesian network meta-analysis and systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing different level of PEEP based on a novel classification of PEEP level: ZEEP group (PEEP = 0 cm H2O); lower PEEP group (PEEP = 1–6 cm H2O); intermediate PEEP group (PEEP = 7–10 cm H2O); higher PEEP group (PEEP > 10 cm H2O). Result: Twenty eight eligible studies with 2,712 patients were included. There were no significant differences in the duration of mechanical ventilation between higher and intermediate PEEP (MD: 0.020, 95% CI: −0.14, 0.28), higher and lower PEEP (MD: −0.010, 95% CI: −0.23, 0.22), higher PEEP and ZEEP (MD: 0.010, 95% CI: −0.40, 0.22), intermediate and lower PEEP (MD: −0.040, 95% CI: −0.18, 0.040), intermediate PEEP and ZEEP (MD: −0.010, 95% CI: −0.42, 0.10), lower PEEP and ZEEP (MD: 0.020, 95% CI: −0.32, 0.13), respectively. Higher PEEP was associated with significantly higher PaO2/FiO2 ratio(PFR) when compared to ZEEP (MD: 73.24, 95% CI: 11.03, 130.7), and higher incidence of pneumothorax when compared to intermediate PEEP, lower PEEP and ZEEP (OR: 2.91e + 12, 95% CI: 40.3, 1.76e + 39; OR: 1.85e + 12, 95% CI: 29.2, 1.18e + 39; and OR: 1.44e + 12, 95% CI: 16.9, 8.70e + 38, respectively). There was no association between PEEP levels and other secondary outcomes. Conclusion: We identified higher PEEP was associated with significantly higher PFR and higher incidence of pneumothorax. Nonetheless, in terms of other outcomes, no significant differences were detected among four levels of PEEP. Systematic Review Registration: The study had registered on an international prospective register of systematic reviews, PROSPERO, on 09 April 2021, identifier: [CRD42021241745]. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8440859 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84408592021-09-16 Optimal Positive End Expiratory Pressure Levels in Ventilated Patients Without Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials Zhou, Jing Lin, Zhimin Deng, Xiumei Liu, Baiyun Zhang, Yu Zheng, Yongxin Zheng, Haichong Wang, Yingzhi Lai, Yan Huang, Weixiang Liu, Xiaoqing He, Weiqun Xu, Yuanda Li, Yimin Huang, Yongbo Sang, Ling Front Med (Lausanne) Medicine Background: To find the optimal positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP) in mechanical ventilated patients without Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS), we conducted a Bayesian network meta-analysis and systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing different level of PEEP based on a novel classification of PEEP level: ZEEP group (PEEP = 0 cm H2O); lower PEEP group (PEEP = 1–6 cm H2O); intermediate PEEP group (PEEP = 7–10 cm H2O); higher PEEP group (PEEP > 10 cm H2O). Result: Twenty eight eligible studies with 2,712 patients were included. There were no significant differences in the duration of mechanical ventilation between higher and intermediate PEEP (MD: 0.020, 95% CI: −0.14, 0.28), higher and lower PEEP (MD: −0.010, 95% CI: −0.23, 0.22), higher PEEP and ZEEP (MD: 0.010, 95% CI: −0.40, 0.22), intermediate and lower PEEP (MD: −0.040, 95% CI: −0.18, 0.040), intermediate PEEP and ZEEP (MD: −0.010, 95% CI: −0.42, 0.10), lower PEEP and ZEEP (MD: 0.020, 95% CI: −0.32, 0.13), respectively. Higher PEEP was associated with significantly higher PaO2/FiO2 ratio(PFR) when compared to ZEEP (MD: 73.24, 95% CI: 11.03, 130.7), and higher incidence of pneumothorax when compared to intermediate PEEP, lower PEEP and ZEEP (OR: 2.91e + 12, 95% CI: 40.3, 1.76e + 39; OR: 1.85e + 12, 95% CI: 29.2, 1.18e + 39; and OR: 1.44e + 12, 95% CI: 16.9, 8.70e + 38, respectively). There was no association between PEEP levels and other secondary outcomes. Conclusion: We identified higher PEEP was associated with significantly higher PFR and higher incidence of pneumothorax. Nonetheless, in terms of other outcomes, no significant differences were detected among four levels of PEEP. Systematic Review Registration: The study had registered on an international prospective register of systematic reviews, PROSPERO, on 09 April 2021, identifier: [CRD42021241745]. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-09-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8440859/ /pubmed/34540872 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2021.730018 Text en Copyright © 2021 Zhou, Lin, Deng, Liu, Zhang, Zheng, Zheng, Wang, Lai, Huang, Liu, He, Xu, Li, Huang and Sang. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Medicine Zhou, Jing Lin, Zhimin Deng, Xiumei Liu, Baiyun Zhang, Yu Zheng, Yongxin Zheng, Haichong Wang, Yingzhi Lai, Yan Huang, Weixiang Liu, Xiaoqing He, Weiqun Xu, Yuanda Li, Yimin Huang, Yongbo Sang, Ling Optimal Positive End Expiratory Pressure Levels in Ventilated Patients Without Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials |
title | Optimal Positive End Expiratory Pressure Levels in Ventilated Patients Without Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials |
title_full | Optimal Positive End Expiratory Pressure Levels in Ventilated Patients Without Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials |
title_fullStr | Optimal Positive End Expiratory Pressure Levels in Ventilated Patients Without Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials |
title_full_unstemmed | Optimal Positive End Expiratory Pressure Levels in Ventilated Patients Without Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials |
title_short | Optimal Positive End Expiratory Pressure Levels in Ventilated Patients Without Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials |
title_sort | optimal positive end expiratory pressure levels in ventilated patients without acute respiratory distress syndrome: a bayesian network meta-analysis and systematic review of randomized controlled trials |
topic | Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8440859/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34540872 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2021.730018 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhoujing optimalpositiveendexpiratorypressurelevelsinventilatedpatientswithoutacuterespiratorydistresssyndromeabayesiannetworkmetaanalysisandsystematicreviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT linzhimin optimalpositiveendexpiratorypressurelevelsinventilatedpatientswithoutacuterespiratorydistresssyndromeabayesiannetworkmetaanalysisandsystematicreviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT dengxiumei optimalpositiveendexpiratorypressurelevelsinventilatedpatientswithoutacuterespiratorydistresssyndromeabayesiannetworkmetaanalysisandsystematicreviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT liubaiyun optimalpositiveendexpiratorypressurelevelsinventilatedpatientswithoutacuterespiratorydistresssyndromeabayesiannetworkmetaanalysisandsystematicreviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT zhangyu optimalpositiveendexpiratorypressurelevelsinventilatedpatientswithoutacuterespiratorydistresssyndromeabayesiannetworkmetaanalysisandsystematicreviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT zhengyongxin optimalpositiveendexpiratorypressurelevelsinventilatedpatientswithoutacuterespiratorydistresssyndromeabayesiannetworkmetaanalysisandsystematicreviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT zhenghaichong optimalpositiveendexpiratorypressurelevelsinventilatedpatientswithoutacuterespiratorydistresssyndromeabayesiannetworkmetaanalysisandsystematicreviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT wangyingzhi optimalpositiveendexpiratorypressurelevelsinventilatedpatientswithoutacuterespiratorydistresssyndromeabayesiannetworkmetaanalysisandsystematicreviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT laiyan optimalpositiveendexpiratorypressurelevelsinventilatedpatientswithoutacuterespiratorydistresssyndromeabayesiannetworkmetaanalysisandsystematicreviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT huangweixiang optimalpositiveendexpiratorypressurelevelsinventilatedpatientswithoutacuterespiratorydistresssyndromeabayesiannetworkmetaanalysisandsystematicreviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT liuxiaoqing optimalpositiveendexpiratorypressurelevelsinventilatedpatientswithoutacuterespiratorydistresssyndromeabayesiannetworkmetaanalysisandsystematicreviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT heweiqun optimalpositiveendexpiratorypressurelevelsinventilatedpatientswithoutacuterespiratorydistresssyndromeabayesiannetworkmetaanalysisandsystematicreviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT xuyuanda optimalpositiveendexpiratorypressurelevelsinventilatedpatientswithoutacuterespiratorydistresssyndromeabayesiannetworkmetaanalysisandsystematicreviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT liyimin optimalpositiveendexpiratorypressurelevelsinventilatedpatientswithoutacuterespiratorydistresssyndromeabayesiannetworkmetaanalysisandsystematicreviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT huangyongbo optimalpositiveendexpiratorypressurelevelsinventilatedpatientswithoutacuterespiratorydistresssyndromeabayesiannetworkmetaanalysisandsystematicreviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT sangling optimalpositiveendexpiratorypressurelevelsinventilatedpatientswithoutacuterespiratorydistresssyndromeabayesiannetworkmetaanalysisandsystematicreviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrials |