Cargando…

Optimal Positive End Expiratory Pressure Levels in Ventilated Patients Without Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials

Background: To find the optimal positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP) in mechanical ventilated patients without Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS), we conducted a Bayesian network meta-analysis and systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing different level of PEEP b...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhou, Jing, Lin, Zhimin, Deng, Xiumei, Liu, Baiyun, Zhang, Yu, Zheng, Yongxin, Zheng, Haichong, Wang, Yingzhi, Lai, Yan, Huang, Weixiang, Liu, Xiaoqing, He, Weiqun, Xu, Yuanda, Li, Yimin, Huang, Yongbo, Sang, Ling
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8440859/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34540872
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2021.730018
_version_ 1783752754098864128
author Zhou, Jing
Lin, Zhimin
Deng, Xiumei
Liu, Baiyun
Zhang, Yu
Zheng, Yongxin
Zheng, Haichong
Wang, Yingzhi
Lai, Yan
Huang, Weixiang
Liu, Xiaoqing
He, Weiqun
Xu, Yuanda
Li, Yimin
Huang, Yongbo
Sang, Ling
author_facet Zhou, Jing
Lin, Zhimin
Deng, Xiumei
Liu, Baiyun
Zhang, Yu
Zheng, Yongxin
Zheng, Haichong
Wang, Yingzhi
Lai, Yan
Huang, Weixiang
Liu, Xiaoqing
He, Weiqun
Xu, Yuanda
Li, Yimin
Huang, Yongbo
Sang, Ling
author_sort Zhou, Jing
collection PubMed
description Background: To find the optimal positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP) in mechanical ventilated patients without Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS), we conducted a Bayesian network meta-analysis and systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing different level of PEEP based on a novel classification of PEEP level: ZEEP group (PEEP = 0 cm H2O); lower PEEP group (PEEP = 1–6 cm H2O); intermediate PEEP group (PEEP = 7–10 cm H2O); higher PEEP group (PEEP > 10 cm H2O). Result: Twenty eight eligible studies with 2,712 patients were included. There were no significant differences in the duration of mechanical ventilation between higher and intermediate PEEP (MD: 0.020, 95% CI: −0.14, 0.28), higher and lower PEEP (MD: −0.010, 95% CI: −0.23, 0.22), higher PEEP and ZEEP (MD: 0.010, 95% CI: −0.40, 0.22), intermediate and lower PEEP (MD: −0.040, 95% CI: −0.18, 0.040), intermediate PEEP and ZEEP (MD: −0.010, 95% CI: −0.42, 0.10), lower PEEP and ZEEP (MD: 0.020, 95% CI: −0.32, 0.13), respectively. Higher PEEP was associated with significantly higher PaO2/FiO2 ratio(PFR) when compared to ZEEP (MD: 73.24, 95% CI: 11.03, 130.7), and higher incidence of pneumothorax when compared to intermediate PEEP, lower PEEP and ZEEP (OR: 2.91e + 12, 95% CI: 40.3, 1.76e + 39; OR: 1.85e + 12, 95% CI: 29.2, 1.18e + 39; and OR: 1.44e + 12, 95% CI: 16.9, 8.70e + 38, respectively). There was no association between PEEP levels and other secondary outcomes. Conclusion: We identified higher PEEP was associated with significantly higher PFR and higher incidence of pneumothorax. Nonetheless, in terms of other outcomes, no significant differences were detected among four levels of PEEP. Systematic Review Registration: The study had registered on an international prospective register of systematic reviews, PROSPERO, on 09 April 2021, identifier: [CRD42021241745].
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8440859
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84408592021-09-16 Optimal Positive End Expiratory Pressure Levels in Ventilated Patients Without Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials Zhou, Jing Lin, Zhimin Deng, Xiumei Liu, Baiyun Zhang, Yu Zheng, Yongxin Zheng, Haichong Wang, Yingzhi Lai, Yan Huang, Weixiang Liu, Xiaoqing He, Weiqun Xu, Yuanda Li, Yimin Huang, Yongbo Sang, Ling Front Med (Lausanne) Medicine Background: To find the optimal positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP) in mechanical ventilated patients without Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS), we conducted a Bayesian network meta-analysis and systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing different level of PEEP based on a novel classification of PEEP level: ZEEP group (PEEP = 0 cm H2O); lower PEEP group (PEEP = 1–6 cm H2O); intermediate PEEP group (PEEP = 7–10 cm H2O); higher PEEP group (PEEP > 10 cm H2O). Result: Twenty eight eligible studies with 2,712 patients were included. There were no significant differences in the duration of mechanical ventilation between higher and intermediate PEEP (MD: 0.020, 95% CI: −0.14, 0.28), higher and lower PEEP (MD: −0.010, 95% CI: −0.23, 0.22), higher PEEP and ZEEP (MD: 0.010, 95% CI: −0.40, 0.22), intermediate and lower PEEP (MD: −0.040, 95% CI: −0.18, 0.040), intermediate PEEP and ZEEP (MD: −0.010, 95% CI: −0.42, 0.10), lower PEEP and ZEEP (MD: 0.020, 95% CI: −0.32, 0.13), respectively. Higher PEEP was associated with significantly higher PaO2/FiO2 ratio(PFR) when compared to ZEEP (MD: 73.24, 95% CI: 11.03, 130.7), and higher incidence of pneumothorax when compared to intermediate PEEP, lower PEEP and ZEEP (OR: 2.91e + 12, 95% CI: 40.3, 1.76e + 39; OR: 1.85e + 12, 95% CI: 29.2, 1.18e + 39; and OR: 1.44e + 12, 95% CI: 16.9, 8.70e + 38, respectively). There was no association between PEEP levels and other secondary outcomes. Conclusion: We identified higher PEEP was associated with significantly higher PFR and higher incidence of pneumothorax. Nonetheless, in terms of other outcomes, no significant differences were detected among four levels of PEEP. Systematic Review Registration: The study had registered on an international prospective register of systematic reviews, PROSPERO, on 09 April 2021, identifier: [CRD42021241745]. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-09-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8440859/ /pubmed/34540872 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2021.730018 Text en Copyright © 2021 Zhou, Lin, Deng, Liu, Zhang, Zheng, Zheng, Wang, Lai, Huang, Liu, He, Xu, Li, Huang and Sang. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Medicine
Zhou, Jing
Lin, Zhimin
Deng, Xiumei
Liu, Baiyun
Zhang, Yu
Zheng, Yongxin
Zheng, Haichong
Wang, Yingzhi
Lai, Yan
Huang, Weixiang
Liu, Xiaoqing
He, Weiqun
Xu, Yuanda
Li, Yimin
Huang, Yongbo
Sang, Ling
Optimal Positive End Expiratory Pressure Levels in Ventilated Patients Without Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials
title Optimal Positive End Expiratory Pressure Levels in Ventilated Patients Without Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials
title_full Optimal Positive End Expiratory Pressure Levels in Ventilated Patients Without Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials
title_fullStr Optimal Positive End Expiratory Pressure Levels in Ventilated Patients Without Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials
title_full_unstemmed Optimal Positive End Expiratory Pressure Levels in Ventilated Patients Without Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials
title_short Optimal Positive End Expiratory Pressure Levels in Ventilated Patients Without Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials
title_sort optimal positive end expiratory pressure levels in ventilated patients without acute respiratory distress syndrome: a bayesian network meta-analysis and systematic review of randomized controlled trials
topic Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8440859/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34540872
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2021.730018
work_keys_str_mv AT zhoujing optimalpositiveendexpiratorypressurelevelsinventilatedpatientswithoutacuterespiratorydistresssyndromeabayesiannetworkmetaanalysisandsystematicreviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT linzhimin optimalpositiveendexpiratorypressurelevelsinventilatedpatientswithoutacuterespiratorydistresssyndromeabayesiannetworkmetaanalysisandsystematicreviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT dengxiumei optimalpositiveendexpiratorypressurelevelsinventilatedpatientswithoutacuterespiratorydistresssyndromeabayesiannetworkmetaanalysisandsystematicreviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT liubaiyun optimalpositiveendexpiratorypressurelevelsinventilatedpatientswithoutacuterespiratorydistresssyndromeabayesiannetworkmetaanalysisandsystematicreviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT zhangyu optimalpositiveendexpiratorypressurelevelsinventilatedpatientswithoutacuterespiratorydistresssyndromeabayesiannetworkmetaanalysisandsystematicreviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT zhengyongxin optimalpositiveendexpiratorypressurelevelsinventilatedpatientswithoutacuterespiratorydistresssyndromeabayesiannetworkmetaanalysisandsystematicreviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT zhenghaichong optimalpositiveendexpiratorypressurelevelsinventilatedpatientswithoutacuterespiratorydistresssyndromeabayesiannetworkmetaanalysisandsystematicreviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT wangyingzhi optimalpositiveendexpiratorypressurelevelsinventilatedpatientswithoutacuterespiratorydistresssyndromeabayesiannetworkmetaanalysisandsystematicreviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT laiyan optimalpositiveendexpiratorypressurelevelsinventilatedpatientswithoutacuterespiratorydistresssyndromeabayesiannetworkmetaanalysisandsystematicreviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT huangweixiang optimalpositiveendexpiratorypressurelevelsinventilatedpatientswithoutacuterespiratorydistresssyndromeabayesiannetworkmetaanalysisandsystematicreviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT liuxiaoqing optimalpositiveendexpiratorypressurelevelsinventilatedpatientswithoutacuterespiratorydistresssyndromeabayesiannetworkmetaanalysisandsystematicreviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT heweiqun optimalpositiveendexpiratorypressurelevelsinventilatedpatientswithoutacuterespiratorydistresssyndromeabayesiannetworkmetaanalysisandsystematicreviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT xuyuanda optimalpositiveendexpiratorypressurelevelsinventilatedpatientswithoutacuterespiratorydistresssyndromeabayesiannetworkmetaanalysisandsystematicreviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT liyimin optimalpositiveendexpiratorypressurelevelsinventilatedpatientswithoutacuterespiratorydistresssyndromeabayesiannetworkmetaanalysisandsystematicreviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT huangyongbo optimalpositiveendexpiratorypressurelevelsinventilatedpatientswithoutacuterespiratorydistresssyndromeabayesiannetworkmetaanalysisandsystematicreviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT sangling optimalpositiveendexpiratorypressurelevelsinventilatedpatientswithoutacuterespiratorydistresssyndromeabayesiannetworkmetaanalysisandsystematicreviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrials