Cargando…

Appropriate PD-L1 Cutoff Value for Gastric Cancer Immunotherapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND: Immunotherapy dramatically changed the treatment landscape of gastric cancer in recent years. PD-L1 expression was proposed as a biomarker; however, the treatment strategy according to PD-L1 is still uncertain. Here, we aimed to find the appropriate cutoff value of PD-L1 expression for g...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xie, Tong, Zhang, Zhening, Zhang, Xiaotian, Qi, Changsong, Shen, Lin, Peng, Zhi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8440909/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34540656
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.646355
_version_ 1783752765544071168
author Xie, Tong
Zhang, Zhening
Zhang, Xiaotian
Qi, Changsong
Shen, Lin
Peng, Zhi
author_facet Xie, Tong
Zhang, Zhening
Zhang, Xiaotian
Qi, Changsong
Shen, Lin
Peng, Zhi
author_sort Xie, Tong
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Immunotherapy dramatically changed the treatment landscape of gastric cancer in recent years. PD-L1 expression was proposed as a biomarker; however, the treatment strategy according to PD-L1 is still uncertain. Here, we aimed to find the appropriate cutoff value of PD-L1 expression for gastric cancer immunotherapy. METHODS: We did a systematic electronic research of prospective clinical trials of gastric cancer immunotherapy across databases. Studies that provided subgroup analysis results stratified by PD-L1 expression were included. Objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), hazard ratio (HR), and 95% confidential interval (CI) of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) at different PD-L1 cutoff values were extracted. RESULTS: Twelve studies and 6,488 patients in total were finally included for pooled analysis. ORR in allover, PD-L1-negative, combined positive score (CPS) ≥1, CPS ≥5, and CPS ≥10 population was 10%, 3%, 13%, 20%, and 23%, respectively. Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) monotherapy failed to show survival advantage in allover and PD-L1-negative patients. Single-agent ICI therapy prolonged OS (HR = 0.84, 95% CI: 0.74–0.96) but not PFS (HR = 1.38, 95% CI: 0.91–2.09) in PD-L1 CPS ≥1 patients. For combined immunotherapy, ORR in allover, PD-L1-negative, CPS ≥1, CPS ≥5, and CPS ≥10 population was 64%, 57%, 48%, 60%, and 58%, respectively. Allover population could gain survival benefit from combined immunotherapy based on the results from Checkmate-649. OS (HR = 0.81, 95% CI: 0.71–0.92) and PFS (HR = 0.77, 95% CI: 0.69–0.86) were significantly prolonged in PD-L1 CPS ≥1 patients receiving combined immunotherapy. CONCLUSION: Efficacy and survival advantages improved with PD-L1 CPS. CPS ≥1 was the cutoff value for ICI monotherapy to gain survival benefit. Combined immunotherapy prolonged PFS and OS in allover population but needs further study to confirm it.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8440909
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84409092021-09-16 Appropriate PD-L1 Cutoff Value for Gastric Cancer Immunotherapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Xie, Tong Zhang, Zhening Zhang, Xiaotian Qi, Changsong Shen, Lin Peng, Zhi Front Oncol Oncology BACKGROUND: Immunotherapy dramatically changed the treatment landscape of gastric cancer in recent years. PD-L1 expression was proposed as a biomarker; however, the treatment strategy according to PD-L1 is still uncertain. Here, we aimed to find the appropriate cutoff value of PD-L1 expression for gastric cancer immunotherapy. METHODS: We did a systematic electronic research of prospective clinical trials of gastric cancer immunotherapy across databases. Studies that provided subgroup analysis results stratified by PD-L1 expression were included. Objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), hazard ratio (HR), and 95% confidential interval (CI) of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) at different PD-L1 cutoff values were extracted. RESULTS: Twelve studies and 6,488 patients in total were finally included for pooled analysis. ORR in allover, PD-L1-negative, combined positive score (CPS) ≥1, CPS ≥5, and CPS ≥10 population was 10%, 3%, 13%, 20%, and 23%, respectively. Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) monotherapy failed to show survival advantage in allover and PD-L1-negative patients. Single-agent ICI therapy prolonged OS (HR = 0.84, 95% CI: 0.74–0.96) but not PFS (HR = 1.38, 95% CI: 0.91–2.09) in PD-L1 CPS ≥1 patients. For combined immunotherapy, ORR in allover, PD-L1-negative, CPS ≥1, CPS ≥5, and CPS ≥10 population was 64%, 57%, 48%, 60%, and 58%, respectively. Allover population could gain survival benefit from combined immunotherapy based on the results from Checkmate-649. OS (HR = 0.81, 95% CI: 0.71–0.92) and PFS (HR = 0.77, 95% CI: 0.69–0.86) were significantly prolonged in PD-L1 CPS ≥1 patients receiving combined immunotherapy. CONCLUSION: Efficacy and survival advantages improved with PD-L1 CPS. CPS ≥1 was the cutoff value for ICI monotherapy to gain survival benefit. Combined immunotherapy prolonged PFS and OS in allover population but needs further study to confirm it. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-09-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8440909/ /pubmed/34540656 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.646355 Text en Copyright © 2021 Xie, Zhang, Zhang, Qi, Shen and Peng https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Oncology
Xie, Tong
Zhang, Zhening
Zhang, Xiaotian
Qi, Changsong
Shen, Lin
Peng, Zhi
Appropriate PD-L1 Cutoff Value for Gastric Cancer Immunotherapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title Appropriate PD-L1 Cutoff Value for Gastric Cancer Immunotherapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full Appropriate PD-L1 Cutoff Value for Gastric Cancer Immunotherapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Appropriate PD-L1 Cutoff Value for Gastric Cancer Immunotherapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Appropriate PD-L1 Cutoff Value for Gastric Cancer Immunotherapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_short Appropriate PD-L1 Cutoff Value for Gastric Cancer Immunotherapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_sort appropriate pd-l1 cutoff value for gastric cancer immunotherapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8440909/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34540656
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.646355
work_keys_str_mv AT xietong appropriatepdl1cutoffvalueforgastriccancerimmunotherapyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhangzhening appropriatepdl1cutoffvalueforgastriccancerimmunotherapyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhangxiaotian appropriatepdl1cutoffvalueforgastriccancerimmunotherapyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT qichangsong appropriatepdl1cutoffvalueforgastriccancerimmunotherapyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT shenlin appropriatepdl1cutoffvalueforgastriccancerimmunotherapyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT pengzhi appropriatepdl1cutoffvalueforgastriccancerimmunotherapyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis