Cargando…

Clinical Research in Neonates: Redesigning the Informed Consent Process in the Digital Era

Background: Currently, many initiatives are devoted to optimizing informed consent for participation in clinical research. Due to the digital transformation in health care, a shift toward electronic informed consent (eIC) has been fostered. However, empirical evidence on how to implement eIC in clin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: De Sutter, Evelien, Coopmans, Birte, Vanendert, Femke, Dooms, Marc, Allegaert, Karel, Borry, Pascal, Huys, Isabelle
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8441012/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34540773
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fped.2021.724431
_version_ 1783752788821409792
author De Sutter, Evelien
Coopmans, Birte
Vanendert, Femke
Dooms, Marc
Allegaert, Karel
Borry, Pascal
Huys, Isabelle
author_facet De Sutter, Evelien
Coopmans, Birte
Vanendert, Femke
Dooms, Marc
Allegaert, Karel
Borry, Pascal
Huys, Isabelle
author_sort De Sutter, Evelien
collection PubMed
description Background: Currently, many initiatives are devoted to optimizing informed consent for participation in clinical research. Due to the digital transformation in health care, a shift toward electronic informed consent (eIC) has been fostered. However, empirical evidence on how to implement eIC in clinical research involving neonates is lacking. Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 31 health care professionals active in Belgium or the Netherlands. All health care professionals had experience in conducting clinical research involving neonates. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed and analyzed using the framework method. Results: Interviewees generally supported the use of eIC in clinical research involving neonates. For example, eIC could enable parents to receive study feedback via the eIC system. Requirements were expressed for parental involvement to decide on which feedback would be appropriate to return. Moreover, experts specialized in presenting information and designing electronic systems should be involved. Broad consensus among health care professionals indicates that the face-to-face-interaction between parents and the research team is vital to establish a relationship of trust. Therefore, it is necessary that the use of eIC runs alongside personal interactions with the parents. Concerns were raised about the accessibility of eIC to parents. For this reason, it was suggested that parents should always be given the possibility to read and sign a paper-based informed consent form or to use eIC. Conclusions: Health care professionals' views indicate that the use of eIC in clinical research with neonates may offer various opportunities. Further development and implementation will require a multi-stakeholder approach.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8441012
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84410122021-09-16 Clinical Research in Neonates: Redesigning the Informed Consent Process in the Digital Era De Sutter, Evelien Coopmans, Birte Vanendert, Femke Dooms, Marc Allegaert, Karel Borry, Pascal Huys, Isabelle Front Pediatr Pediatrics Background: Currently, many initiatives are devoted to optimizing informed consent for participation in clinical research. Due to the digital transformation in health care, a shift toward electronic informed consent (eIC) has been fostered. However, empirical evidence on how to implement eIC in clinical research involving neonates is lacking. Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 31 health care professionals active in Belgium or the Netherlands. All health care professionals had experience in conducting clinical research involving neonates. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed and analyzed using the framework method. Results: Interviewees generally supported the use of eIC in clinical research involving neonates. For example, eIC could enable parents to receive study feedback via the eIC system. Requirements were expressed for parental involvement to decide on which feedback would be appropriate to return. Moreover, experts specialized in presenting information and designing electronic systems should be involved. Broad consensus among health care professionals indicates that the face-to-face-interaction between parents and the research team is vital to establish a relationship of trust. Therefore, it is necessary that the use of eIC runs alongside personal interactions with the parents. Concerns were raised about the accessibility of eIC to parents. For this reason, it was suggested that parents should always be given the possibility to read and sign a paper-based informed consent form or to use eIC. Conclusions: Health care professionals' views indicate that the use of eIC in clinical research with neonates may offer various opportunities. Further development and implementation will require a multi-stakeholder approach. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-09-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8441012/ /pubmed/34540773 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fped.2021.724431 Text en Copyright © 2021 De Sutter, Coopmans, Vanendert, Dooms, Allegaert, Borry and Huys. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Pediatrics
De Sutter, Evelien
Coopmans, Birte
Vanendert, Femke
Dooms, Marc
Allegaert, Karel
Borry, Pascal
Huys, Isabelle
Clinical Research in Neonates: Redesigning the Informed Consent Process in the Digital Era
title Clinical Research in Neonates: Redesigning the Informed Consent Process in the Digital Era
title_full Clinical Research in Neonates: Redesigning the Informed Consent Process in the Digital Era
title_fullStr Clinical Research in Neonates: Redesigning the Informed Consent Process in the Digital Era
title_full_unstemmed Clinical Research in Neonates: Redesigning the Informed Consent Process in the Digital Era
title_short Clinical Research in Neonates: Redesigning the Informed Consent Process in the Digital Era
title_sort clinical research in neonates: redesigning the informed consent process in the digital era
topic Pediatrics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8441012/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34540773
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fped.2021.724431
work_keys_str_mv AT desutterevelien clinicalresearchinneonatesredesigningtheinformedconsentprocessinthedigitalera
AT coopmansbirte clinicalresearchinneonatesredesigningtheinformedconsentprocessinthedigitalera
AT vanendertfemke clinicalresearchinneonatesredesigningtheinformedconsentprocessinthedigitalera
AT doomsmarc clinicalresearchinneonatesredesigningtheinformedconsentprocessinthedigitalera
AT allegaertkarel clinicalresearchinneonatesredesigningtheinformedconsentprocessinthedigitalera
AT borrypascal clinicalresearchinneonatesredesigningtheinformedconsentprocessinthedigitalera
AT huysisabelle clinicalresearchinneonatesredesigningtheinformedconsentprocessinthedigitalera