Cargando…
Clinical Research in Neonates: Redesigning the Informed Consent Process in the Digital Era
Background: Currently, many initiatives are devoted to optimizing informed consent for participation in clinical research. Due to the digital transformation in health care, a shift toward electronic informed consent (eIC) has been fostered. However, empirical evidence on how to implement eIC in clin...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8441012/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34540773 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fped.2021.724431 |
_version_ | 1783752788821409792 |
---|---|
author | De Sutter, Evelien Coopmans, Birte Vanendert, Femke Dooms, Marc Allegaert, Karel Borry, Pascal Huys, Isabelle |
author_facet | De Sutter, Evelien Coopmans, Birte Vanendert, Femke Dooms, Marc Allegaert, Karel Borry, Pascal Huys, Isabelle |
author_sort | De Sutter, Evelien |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: Currently, many initiatives are devoted to optimizing informed consent for participation in clinical research. Due to the digital transformation in health care, a shift toward electronic informed consent (eIC) has been fostered. However, empirical evidence on how to implement eIC in clinical research involving neonates is lacking. Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 31 health care professionals active in Belgium or the Netherlands. All health care professionals had experience in conducting clinical research involving neonates. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed and analyzed using the framework method. Results: Interviewees generally supported the use of eIC in clinical research involving neonates. For example, eIC could enable parents to receive study feedback via the eIC system. Requirements were expressed for parental involvement to decide on which feedback would be appropriate to return. Moreover, experts specialized in presenting information and designing electronic systems should be involved. Broad consensus among health care professionals indicates that the face-to-face-interaction between parents and the research team is vital to establish a relationship of trust. Therefore, it is necessary that the use of eIC runs alongside personal interactions with the parents. Concerns were raised about the accessibility of eIC to parents. For this reason, it was suggested that parents should always be given the possibility to read and sign a paper-based informed consent form or to use eIC. Conclusions: Health care professionals' views indicate that the use of eIC in clinical research with neonates may offer various opportunities. Further development and implementation will require a multi-stakeholder approach. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8441012 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84410122021-09-16 Clinical Research in Neonates: Redesigning the Informed Consent Process in the Digital Era De Sutter, Evelien Coopmans, Birte Vanendert, Femke Dooms, Marc Allegaert, Karel Borry, Pascal Huys, Isabelle Front Pediatr Pediatrics Background: Currently, many initiatives are devoted to optimizing informed consent for participation in clinical research. Due to the digital transformation in health care, a shift toward electronic informed consent (eIC) has been fostered. However, empirical evidence on how to implement eIC in clinical research involving neonates is lacking. Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 31 health care professionals active in Belgium or the Netherlands. All health care professionals had experience in conducting clinical research involving neonates. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed and analyzed using the framework method. Results: Interviewees generally supported the use of eIC in clinical research involving neonates. For example, eIC could enable parents to receive study feedback via the eIC system. Requirements were expressed for parental involvement to decide on which feedback would be appropriate to return. Moreover, experts specialized in presenting information and designing electronic systems should be involved. Broad consensus among health care professionals indicates that the face-to-face-interaction between parents and the research team is vital to establish a relationship of trust. Therefore, it is necessary that the use of eIC runs alongside personal interactions with the parents. Concerns were raised about the accessibility of eIC to parents. For this reason, it was suggested that parents should always be given the possibility to read and sign a paper-based informed consent form or to use eIC. Conclusions: Health care professionals' views indicate that the use of eIC in clinical research with neonates may offer various opportunities. Further development and implementation will require a multi-stakeholder approach. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-09-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8441012/ /pubmed/34540773 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fped.2021.724431 Text en Copyright © 2021 De Sutter, Coopmans, Vanendert, Dooms, Allegaert, Borry and Huys. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Pediatrics De Sutter, Evelien Coopmans, Birte Vanendert, Femke Dooms, Marc Allegaert, Karel Borry, Pascal Huys, Isabelle Clinical Research in Neonates: Redesigning the Informed Consent Process in the Digital Era |
title | Clinical Research in Neonates: Redesigning the Informed Consent Process in the Digital Era |
title_full | Clinical Research in Neonates: Redesigning the Informed Consent Process in the Digital Era |
title_fullStr | Clinical Research in Neonates: Redesigning the Informed Consent Process in the Digital Era |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinical Research in Neonates: Redesigning the Informed Consent Process in the Digital Era |
title_short | Clinical Research in Neonates: Redesigning the Informed Consent Process in the Digital Era |
title_sort | clinical research in neonates: redesigning the informed consent process in the digital era |
topic | Pediatrics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8441012/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34540773 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fped.2021.724431 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT desutterevelien clinicalresearchinneonatesredesigningtheinformedconsentprocessinthedigitalera AT coopmansbirte clinicalresearchinneonatesredesigningtheinformedconsentprocessinthedigitalera AT vanendertfemke clinicalresearchinneonatesredesigningtheinformedconsentprocessinthedigitalera AT doomsmarc clinicalresearchinneonatesredesigningtheinformedconsentprocessinthedigitalera AT allegaertkarel clinicalresearchinneonatesredesigningtheinformedconsentprocessinthedigitalera AT borrypascal clinicalresearchinneonatesredesigningtheinformedconsentprocessinthedigitalera AT huysisabelle clinicalresearchinneonatesredesigningtheinformedconsentprocessinthedigitalera |