Cargando…

Improving antitumor immunity using antiangiogenic agents: Mechanistic insights, current progress, and clinical challenges

Cancer immunotherapy, especially immune checkpoint blockade (ICB), has revolutionized oncology. However, only a limited number of patients benefit from immunotherapy, and some cancers that initially respond to immunotherapy can ultimately relapse and progress. Thus, some studies have investigated co...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Shu‐Jin, Chen, Jia‐Xian, Sun, Zhi‐Jun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8441058/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34137513
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cac2.12183
_version_ 1783752798692704256
author Li, Shu‐Jin
Chen, Jia‐Xian
Sun, Zhi‐Jun
author_facet Li, Shu‐Jin
Chen, Jia‐Xian
Sun, Zhi‐Jun
author_sort Li, Shu‐Jin
collection PubMed
description Cancer immunotherapy, especially immune checkpoint blockade (ICB), has revolutionized oncology. However, only a limited number of patients benefit from immunotherapy, and some cancers that initially respond to immunotherapy can ultimately relapse and progress. Thus, some studies have investigated combining immunotherapy with other therapies to overcome resistance to monotherapy. Recently, multiple preclinical and clinical studies have shown that tumor vasculature is a determinant of whether immunotherapy will elicit an antitumor response; thus, vascular targeting may be a promising strategy to improve cancer immunotherapy outcomes. A successful antitumor immune response requires an intact “Cancer‐Immunity Cycle,” including T cell priming and activation, immune cell recruitment, and recognition and killing of cancer cells. Angiogenic inducers, especially vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), can interfere with activation, infiltration, and function of T cells, thus breaking the “Cancer‐Immunity Cycle.” Together with immunostimulation‐regulated tumor vessel remodeling, VEGF‐mediated immunosuppression provides a solid therapeutic rationale for combining immunotherapy with antiangiogenic agents to treat solid tumors. Following the successes of recent landmark phase III clinical trials, therapies combining immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) with antiangiogenic agents have become first‐line treatments for multiple solid tumors, whereas the efficacy of such combinations in other solid tumors remains to be validated in ongoing studies. In this review, we discussed synergies between antiangiogenic agents and cancer immunotherapy based on results from preclinical and translational studies. Then, we discussed recent progress in randomized clinical trials. ICI‐containing combinations were the focus of this review because of their recent successes, but combinations containing other immunotherapies were also discussed. Finally, we attempted to define critical challenges in combining ICIs with antiangiogenic agents to promote coordination and stimulate collaboration within the research community.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8441058
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84410582021-09-15 Improving antitumor immunity using antiangiogenic agents: Mechanistic insights, current progress, and clinical challenges Li, Shu‐Jin Chen, Jia‐Xian Sun, Zhi‐Jun Cancer Commun (Lond) Reviews Cancer immunotherapy, especially immune checkpoint blockade (ICB), has revolutionized oncology. However, only a limited number of patients benefit from immunotherapy, and some cancers that initially respond to immunotherapy can ultimately relapse and progress. Thus, some studies have investigated combining immunotherapy with other therapies to overcome resistance to monotherapy. Recently, multiple preclinical and clinical studies have shown that tumor vasculature is a determinant of whether immunotherapy will elicit an antitumor response; thus, vascular targeting may be a promising strategy to improve cancer immunotherapy outcomes. A successful antitumor immune response requires an intact “Cancer‐Immunity Cycle,” including T cell priming and activation, immune cell recruitment, and recognition and killing of cancer cells. Angiogenic inducers, especially vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), can interfere with activation, infiltration, and function of T cells, thus breaking the “Cancer‐Immunity Cycle.” Together with immunostimulation‐regulated tumor vessel remodeling, VEGF‐mediated immunosuppression provides a solid therapeutic rationale for combining immunotherapy with antiangiogenic agents to treat solid tumors. Following the successes of recent landmark phase III clinical trials, therapies combining immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) with antiangiogenic agents have become first‐line treatments for multiple solid tumors, whereas the efficacy of such combinations in other solid tumors remains to be validated in ongoing studies. In this review, we discussed synergies between antiangiogenic agents and cancer immunotherapy based on results from preclinical and translational studies. Then, we discussed recent progress in randomized clinical trials. ICI‐containing combinations were the focus of this review because of their recent successes, but combinations containing other immunotherapies were also discussed. Finally, we attempted to define critical challenges in combining ICIs with antiangiogenic agents to promote coordination and stimulate collaboration within the research community. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-06-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8441058/ /pubmed/34137513 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cac2.12183 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Cancer Communications published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd. on behalf of Sun Yat‐sen University Cancer Center https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Reviews
Li, Shu‐Jin
Chen, Jia‐Xian
Sun, Zhi‐Jun
Improving antitumor immunity using antiangiogenic agents: Mechanistic insights, current progress, and clinical challenges
title Improving antitumor immunity using antiangiogenic agents: Mechanistic insights, current progress, and clinical challenges
title_full Improving antitumor immunity using antiangiogenic agents: Mechanistic insights, current progress, and clinical challenges
title_fullStr Improving antitumor immunity using antiangiogenic agents: Mechanistic insights, current progress, and clinical challenges
title_full_unstemmed Improving antitumor immunity using antiangiogenic agents: Mechanistic insights, current progress, and clinical challenges
title_short Improving antitumor immunity using antiangiogenic agents: Mechanistic insights, current progress, and clinical challenges
title_sort improving antitumor immunity using antiangiogenic agents: mechanistic insights, current progress, and clinical challenges
topic Reviews
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8441058/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34137513
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cac2.12183
work_keys_str_mv AT lishujin improvingantitumorimmunityusingantiangiogenicagentsmechanisticinsightscurrentprogressandclinicalchallenges
AT chenjiaxian improvingantitumorimmunityusingantiangiogenicagentsmechanisticinsightscurrentprogressandclinicalchallenges
AT sunzhijun improvingantitumorimmunityusingantiangiogenicagentsmechanisticinsightscurrentprogressandclinicalchallenges