Cargando…
Global epidemiology of COVID-19 knowledge, attitude and practice: a systematic review and meta-analysis
OBJECTIVE: To assess the knowledge, attitude and practice (KAP) of the global general population regarding COVID-19. DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS: MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL and PsycINFO were used to identify articles published between 1 January and 30 June 2021 assessing KAP re...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8441223/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34521674 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051447 |
_version_ | 1783752832130744320 |
---|---|
author | Siddiquea, Bodrun Naher Shetty, Aishwarya Bhattacharya, Oashe Afroz, Afsana Billah, Baki |
author_facet | Siddiquea, Bodrun Naher Shetty, Aishwarya Bhattacharya, Oashe Afroz, Afsana Billah, Baki |
author_sort | Siddiquea, Bodrun Naher |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To assess the knowledge, attitude and practice (KAP) of the global general population regarding COVID-19. DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS: MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL and PsycINFO were used to identify articles published between 1 January and 30 June 2021 assessing KAP regarding COVID-19 in the global general population. The quality of eligible studies was assessed. Random effects model was used to obtain the pooled proportion of each component of KAP of COVID-19. Heterogeneity (I(2)) was tested, and subgroup and correlation analyses were performed. RESULTS: Out of 3099 records, 84 studies from 45 countries across all continents assessing 215 731 participants’ COVID-19 KAP were included in this study. The estimated overall correct answers for knowledge, good attitude and good practice in this review were 75% (95% CI 72% to 77%), 74% (95% CI 71% to 77%) and 70% (95% CI 66% to 74%), respectively. Low-income countries, men, people aged below 30 years and people with 12 years of education or less had the lowest practice scores. Practice scores were below 60% in Africa and Europe/Oceania. Overall heterogeneity was high (I(2) ≥98%), and publication bias was present (Egger’s regression test, p<0.01). A positive significant correlation between knowledge and practice (r=0.314, p=0.006), and attitude and practice (r=0.348, p=0.004) was observed. CONCLUSIONS: This study’s findings call for community-based awareness programmes to provide a simple, clear and understandable message to reinforce knowledge especially regarding efficacy of the preventive measures in low and lower middle-income countries, and in Africa and Europe/Oceania, which will translate into good practice. Targeted intervention for men, people with low education, unemployed people and people aged below 30 years should be recommended. As most of the included studies were online surveys, underprivileged and remote rural people may have been missed out. Additional studies are needed to cover heterogeneous populations. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42020203476. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8441223 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84412232021-09-16 Global epidemiology of COVID-19 knowledge, attitude and practice: a systematic review and meta-analysis Siddiquea, Bodrun Naher Shetty, Aishwarya Bhattacharya, Oashe Afroz, Afsana Billah, Baki BMJ Open Epidemiology OBJECTIVE: To assess the knowledge, attitude and practice (KAP) of the global general population regarding COVID-19. DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS: MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL and PsycINFO were used to identify articles published between 1 January and 30 June 2021 assessing KAP regarding COVID-19 in the global general population. The quality of eligible studies was assessed. Random effects model was used to obtain the pooled proportion of each component of KAP of COVID-19. Heterogeneity (I(2)) was tested, and subgroup and correlation analyses were performed. RESULTS: Out of 3099 records, 84 studies from 45 countries across all continents assessing 215 731 participants’ COVID-19 KAP were included in this study. The estimated overall correct answers for knowledge, good attitude and good practice in this review were 75% (95% CI 72% to 77%), 74% (95% CI 71% to 77%) and 70% (95% CI 66% to 74%), respectively. Low-income countries, men, people aged below 30 years and people with 12 years of education or less had the lowest practice scores. Practice scores were below 60% in Africa and Europe/Oceania. Overall heterogeneity was high (I(2) ≥98%), and publication bias was present (Egger’s regression test, p<0.01). A positive significant correlation between knowledge and practice (r=0.314, p=0.006), and attitude and practice (r=0.348, p=0.004) was observed. CONCLUSIONS: This study’s findings call for community-based awareness programmes to provide a simple, clear and understandable message to reinforce knowledge especially regarding efficacy of the preventive measures in low and lower middle-income countries, and in Africa and Europe/Oceania, which will translate into good practice. Targeted intervention for men, people with low education, unemployed people and people aged below 30 years should be recommended. As most of the included studies were online surveys, underprivileged and remote rural people may have been missed out. Additional studies are needed to cover heterogeneous populations. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42020203476. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-09-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8441223/ /pubmed/34521674 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051447 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Epidemiology Siddiquea, Bodrun Naher Shetty, Aishwarya Bhattacharya, Oashe Afroz, Afsana Billah, Baki Global epidemiology of COVID-19 knowledge, attitude and practice: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | Global epidemiology of COVID-19 knowledge, attitude and practice: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | Global epidemiology of COVID-19 knowledge, attitude and practice: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Global epidemiology of COVID-19 knowledge, attitude and practice: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Global epidemiology of COVID-19 knowledge, attitude and practice: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | Global epidemiology of COVID-19 knowledge, attitude and practice: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | global epidemiology of covid-19 knowledge, attitude and practice: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Epidemiology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8441223/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34521674 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051447 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT siddiqueabodrunnaher globalepidemiologyofcovid19knowledgeattitudeandpracticeasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT shettyaishwarya globalepidemiologyofcovid19knowledgeattitudeandpracticeasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT bhattacharyaoashe globalepidemiologyofcovid19knowledgeattitudeandpracticeasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT afrozafsana globalepidemiologyofcovid19knowledgeattitudeandpracticeasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT billahbaki globalepidemiologyofcovid19knowledgeattitudeandpracticeasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |