Cargando…

Global epidemiology of COVID-19 knowledge, attitude and practice: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE: To assess the knowledge, attitude and practice (KAP) of the global general population regarding COVID-19. DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS: MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL and PsycINFO were used to identify articles published between 1 January and 30 June 2021 assessing KAP re...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Siddiquea, Bodrun Naher, Shetty, Aishwarya, Bhattacharya, Oashe, Afroz, Afsana, Billah, Baki
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8441223/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34521674
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051447
_version_ 1783752832130744320
author Siddiquea, Bodrun Naher
Shetty, Aishwarya
Bhattacharya, Oashe
Afroz, Afsana
Billah, Baki
author_facet Siddiquea, Bodrun Naher
Shetty, Aishwarya
Bhattacharya, Oashe
Afroz, Afsana
Billah, Baki
author_sort Siddiquea, Bodrun Naher
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To assess the knowledge, attitude and practice (KAP) of the global general population regarding COVID-19. DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS: MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL and PsycINFO were used to identify articles published between 1 January and 30 June 2021 assessing KAP regarding COVID-19 in the global general population. The quality of eligible studies was assessed. Random effects model was used to obtain the pooled proportion of each component of KAP of COVID-19. Heterogeneity (I(2)) was tested, and subgroup and correlation analyses were performed. RESULTS: Out of 3099 records, 84 studies from 45 countries across all continents assessing 215 731 participants’ COVID-19 KAP were included in this study. The estimated overall correct answers for knowledge, good attitude and good practice in this review were 75% (95% CI 72% to 77%), 74% (95% CI 71% to 77%) and 70% (95% CI 66% to 74%), respectively. Low-income countries, men, people aged below 30 years and people with 12 years of education or less had the lowest practice scores. Practice scores were below 60% in Africa and Europe/Oceania. Overall heterogeneity was high (I(2) ≥98%), and publication bias was present (Egger’s regression test, p<0.01). A positive significant correlation between knowledge and practice (r=0.314, p=0.006), and attitude and practice (r=0.348, p=0.004) was observed. CONCLUSIONS: This study’s findings call for community-based awareness programmes to provide a simple, clear and understandable message to reinforce knowledge especially regarding efficacy of the preventive measures in low and lower middle-income countries, and in Africa and Europe/Oceania, which will translate into good practice. Targeted intervention for men, people with low education, unemployed people and people aged below 30 years should be recommended. As most of the included studies were online surveys, underprivileged and remote rural people may have been missed out. Additional studies are needed to cover heterogeneous populations. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42020203476.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8441223
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84412232021-09-16 Global epidemiology of COVID-19 knowledge, attitude and practice: a systematic review and meta-analysis Siddiquea, Bodrun Naher Shetty, Aishwarya Bhattacharya, Oashe Afroz, Afsana Billah, Baki BMJ Open Epidemiology OBJECTIVE: To assess the knowledge, attitude and practice (KAP) of the global general population regarding COVID-19. DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS: MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL and PsycINFO were used to identify articles published between 1 January and 30 June 2021 assessing KAP regarding COVID-19 in the global general population. The quality of eligible studies was assessed. Random effects model was used to obtain the pooled proportion of each component of KAP of COVID-19. Heterogeneity (I(2)) was tested, and subgroup and correlation analyses were performed. RESULTS: Out of 3099 records, 84 studies from 45 countries across all continents assessing 215 731 participants’ COVID-19 KAP were included in this study. The estimated overall correct answers for knowledge, good attitude and good practice in this review were 75% (95% CI 72% to 77%), 74% (95% CI 71% to 77%) and 70% (95% CI 66% to 74%), respectively. Low-income countries, men, people aged below 30 years and people with 12 years of education or less had the lowest practice scores. Practice scores were below 60% in Africa and Europe/Oceania. Overall heterogeneity was high (I(2) ≥98%), and publication bias was present (Egger’s regression test, p<0.01). A positive significant correlation between knowledge and practice (r=0.314, p=0.006), and attitude and practice (r=0.348, p=0.004) was observed. CONCLUSIONS: This study’s findings call for community-based awareness programmes to provide a simple, clear and understandable message to reinforce knowledge especially regarding efficacy of the preventive measures in low and lower middle-income countries, and in Africa and Europe/Oceania, which will translate into good practice. Targeted intervention for men, people with low education, unemployed people and people aged below 30 years should be recommended. As most of the included studies were online surveys, underprivileged and remote rural people may have been missed out. Additional studies are needed to cover heterogeneous populations. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42020203476. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-09-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8441223/ /pubmed/34521674 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051447 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Epidemiology
Siddiquea, Bodrun Naher
Shetty, Aishwarya
Bhattacharya, Oashe
Afroz, Afsana
Billah, Baki
Global epidemiology of COVID-19 knowledge, attitude and practice: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Global epidemiology of COVID-19 knowledge, attitude and practice: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Global epidemiology of COVID-19 knowledge, attitude and practice: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Global epidemiology of COVID-19 knowledge, attitude and practice: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Global epidemiology of COVID-19 knowledge, attitude and practice: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Global epidemiology of COVID-19 knowledge, attitude and practice: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort global epidemiology of covid-19 knowledge, attitude and practice: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Epidemiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8441223/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34521674
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051447
work_keys_str_mv AT siddiqueabodrunnaher globalepidemiologyofcovid19knowledgeattitudeandpracticeasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT shettyaishwarya globalepidemiologyofcovid19knowledgeattitudeandpracticeasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT bhattacharyaoashe globalepidemiologyofcovid19knowledgeattitudeandpracticeasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT afrozafsana globalepidemiologyofcovid19knowledgeattitudeandpracticeasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT billahbaki globalepidemiologyofcovid19knowledgeattitudeandpracticeasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis