Cargando…

Independent External Validation of FRAX and Garvan Fracture Risk Calculators: A Sub‐Study of the FRISBEE Cohort

Probabilistic models including clinical risk factors with or without bone mineral density (BMD) have been developed to estimate the 5‐ or 10‐year absolute fracture risk. We investigated the performance of the FRAX and Garvan tools in a well‐characterized population‐based cohort of 3560 postmenopausa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Baleanu, Felicia, Iconaru, Laura, Charles, Alexia, Kinnard, Virginie, Fils, Jean‐François, Moreau, Michel, Karmali, Rafik, Surquin, Murielle, Benoit, Florence, Mugisha, Aude, Paesmans, Marianne, Laurent, Michaël R, Bergmann, Pierre, Body, Jean‐Jacques
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8441269/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34532617
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jbm4.10532
_version_ 1783752840811905024
author Baleanu, Felicia
Iconaru, Laura
Charles, Alexia
Kinnard, Virginie
Fils, Jean‐François
Moreau, Michel
Karmali, Rafik
Surquin, Murielle
Benoit, Florence
Mugisha, Aude
Paesmans, Marianne
Laurent, Michaël R
Bergmann, Pierre
Body, Jean‐Jacques
author_facet Baleanu, Felicia
Iconaru, Laura
Charles, Alexia
Kinnard, Virginie
Fils, Jean‐François
Moreau, Michel
Karmali, Rafik
Surquin, Murielle
Benoit, Florence
Mugisha, Aude
Paesmans, Marianne
Laurent, Michaël R
Bergmann, Pierre
Body, Jean‐Jacques
author_sort Baleanu, Felicia
collection PubMed
description Probabilistic models including clinical risk factors with or without bone mineral density (BMD) have been developed to estimate the 5‐ or 10‐year absolute fracture risk. We investigated the performance of the FRAX and Garvan tools in a well‐characterized population‐based cohort of 3560 postmenopausal, volunteer women, aged 60 to 85 years at baseline, included in the Fracture Risk Brussels Epidemiological Enquiry (FRISBEE) cohort, during 5 years of follow‐up. Baseline data were used to calculate the estimated 10‐year risk of hip and major osteoporotic fractures (MOFs) for each participant using FRAX (Belgium). We computed the 5‐year risk according to the Garvan model with BMD. For calibration, the predicted risk of fracture was compared with fracture incidence across a large range of estimated fracture risks. The accuracy of the calculators to predict fractures was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC). The FRAX tool was well calibrated for hip fractures (slope 1.09, p < 0.001; intercept −0.001, p = 0.46), but it consistently underestimated the incidence of major osteoporotic fractures (MOFs) (slope 2.12, p < 0.001; intercept −0.02, p = 0.06). The Garvan tool was well calibrated for “any Garvan” fractures (slope 1.05, p < 0.001; intercept 0.01, p = 0.37) but largely overestimated the observed hip fracture rate (slope 0.32, p < 0.001; intercept 0.006, p = 0.05). The predictive value for hip fractures was better for FRAX (AUC: 0.841, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.795–0.887) than for Garvan (AUC: 0.769, 95% CI 0.702–0.836, p = 0.01). The Garvan AUC for “any Garvan” fractures was 0.721 (95% CI 0.693–0.749) and FRAX AUC for MOFs was 0.708 (95% CI 0.675–0.741). In conclusion, in our Belgian cohort, FRAX estimated quite well hip fractures but underestimated MOFs, while Garvan overestimated hip fracture risk but showed a good estimation of “any Garvan” fractures. Both models had a good discriminatory value for hip fractures but only a moderate discriminatory ability for MOFs or “any Garvan” fractures. © 2021 The Authors. JBMR Plus published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8441269
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84412692021-09-15 Independent External Validation of FRAX and Garvan Fracture Risk Calculators: A Sub‐Study of the FRISBEE Cohort Baleanu, Felicia Iconaru, Laura Charles, Alexia Kinnard, Virginie Fils, Jean‐François Moreau, Michel Karmali, Rafik Surquin, Murielle Benoit, Florence Mugisha, Aude Paesmans, Marianne Laurent, Michaël R Bergmann, Pierre Body, Jean‐Jacques JBMR Plus Original Articles Probabilistic models including clinical risk factors with or without bone mineral density (BMD) have been developed to estimate the 5‐ or 10‐year absolute fracture risk. We investigated the performance of the FRAX and Garvan tools in a well‐characterized population‐based cohort of 3560 postmenopausal, volunteer women, aged 60 to 85 years at baseline, included in the Fracture Risk Brussels Epidemiological Enquiry (FRISBEE) cohort, during 5 years of follow‐up. Baseline data were used to calculate the estimated 10‐year risk of hip and major osteoporotic fractures (MOFs) for each participant using FRAX (Belgium). We computed the 5‐year risk according to the Garvan model with BMD. For calibration, the predicted risk of fracture was compared with fracture incidence across a large range of estimated fracture risks. The accuracy of the calculators to predict fractures was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC). The FRAX tool was well calibrated for hip fractures (slope 1.09, p < 0.001; intercept −0.001, p = 0.46), but it consistently underestimated the incidence of major osteoporotic fractures (MOFs) (slope 2.12, p < 0.001; intercept −0.02, p = 0.06). The Garvan tool was well calibrated for “any Garvan” fractures (slope 1.05, p < 0.001; intercept 0.01, p = 0.37) but largely overestimated the observed hip fracture rate (slope 0.32, p < 0.001; intercept 0.006, p = 0.05). The predictive value for hip fractures was better for FRAX (AUC: 0.841, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.795–0.887) than for Garvan (AUC: 0.769, 95% CI 0.702–0.836, p = 0.01). The Garvan AUC for “any Garvan” fractures was 0.721 (95% CI 0.693–0.749) and FRAX AUC for MOFs was 0.708 (95% CI 0.675–0.741). In conclusion, in our Belgian cohort, FRAX estimated quite well hip fractures but underestimated MOFs, while Garvan overestimated hip fracture risk but showed a good estimation of “any Garvan” fractures. Both models had a good discriminatory value for hip fractures but only a moderate discriminatory ability for MOFs or “any Garvan” fractures. © 2021 The Authors. JBMR Plus published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2021-08-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8441269/ /pubmed/34532617 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jbm4.10532 Text en © 2021 The Authors. JBMR Plus published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Baleanu, Felicia
Iconaru, Laura
Charles, Alexia
Kinnard, Virginie
Fils, Jean‐François
Moreau, Michel
Karmali, Rafik
Surquin, Murielle
Benoit, Florence
Mugisha, Aude
Paesmans, Marianne
Laurent, Michaël R
Bergmann, Pierre
Body, Jean‐Jacques
Independent External Validation of FRAX and Garvan Fracture Risk Calculators: A Sub‐Study of the FRISBEE Cohort
title Independent External Validation of FRAX and Garvan Fracture Risk Calculators: A Sub‐Study of the FRISBEE Cohort
title_full Independent External Validation of FRAX and Garvan Fracture Risk Calculators: A Sub‐Study of the FRISBEE Cohort
title_fullStr Independent External Validation of FRAX and Garvan Fracture Risk Calculators: A Sub‐Study of the FRISBEE Cohort
title_full_unstemmed Independent External Validation of FRAX and Garvan Fracture Risk Calculators: A Sub‐Study of the FRISBEE Cohort
title_short Independent External Validation of FRAX and Garvan Fracture Risk Calculators: A Sub‐Study of the FRISBEE Cohort
title_sort independent external validation of frax and garvan fracture risk calculators: a sub‐study of the frisbee cohort
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8441269/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34532617
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jbm4.10532
work_keys_str_mv AT baleanufelicia independentexternalvalidationoffraxandgarvanfractureriskcalculatorsasubstudyofthefrisbeecohort
AT iconarulaura independentexternalvalidationoffraxandgarvanfractureriskcalculatorsasubstudyofthefrisbeecohort
AT charlesalexia independentexternalvalidationoffraxandgarvanfractureriskcalculatorsasubstudyofthefrisbeecohort
AT kinnardvirginie independentexternalvalidationoffraxandgarvanfractureriskcalculatorsasubstudyofthefrisbeecohort
AT filsjeanfrancois independentexternalvalidationoffraxandgarvanfractureriskcalculatorsasubstudyofthefrisbeecohort
AT moreaumichel independentexternalvalidationoffraxandgarvanfractureriskcalculatorsasubstudyofthefrisbeecohort
AT karmalirafik independentexternalvalidationoffraxandgarvanfractureriskcalculatorsasubstudyofthefrisbeecohort
AT surquinmurielle independentexternalvalidationoffraxandgarvanfractureriskcalculatorsasubstudyofthefrisbeecohort
AT benoitflorence independentexternalvalidationoffraxandgarvanfractureriskcalculatorsasubstudyofthefrisbeecohort
AT mugishaaude independentexternalvalidationoffraxandgarvanfractureriskcalculatorsasubstudyofthefrisbeecohort
AT paesmansmarianne independentexternalvalidationoffraxandgarvanfractureriskcalculatorsasubstudyofthefrisbeecohort
AT laurentmichaelr independentexternalvalidationoffraxandgarvanfractureriskcalculatorsasubstudyofthefrisbeecohort
AT bergmannpierre independentexternalvalidationoffraxandgarvanfractureriskcalculatorsasubstudyofthefrisbeecohort
AT bodyjeanjacques independentexternalvalidationoffraxandgarvanfractureriskcalculatorsasubstudyofthefrisbeecohort