Cargando…

Parliament's One‐Year Review of the Coronavirus Act 2020: Another Example of Parliament's Marginalisation in the Covid‐19 Pandemic

In this article, we consider the one‐year review (OYR) by Parliament of temporary powers in the Coronavirus Act 2020 (CVA). The OYR stands as a key concession on the part of the UK government to enable scrutiny of Covid‐19 law making, after the CVA was rushed through Parliament at the beginning of t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lock, Daniella, Hidalgo, Pablo Grez, de Londras, Fiona
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8441824/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34538934
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-923X.13048
_version_ 1783752916699447296
author Lock, Daniella
Hidalgo, Pablo Grez
de Londras, Fiona
author_facet Lock, Daniella
Hidalgo, Pablo Grez
de Londras, Fiona
author_sort Lock, Daniella
collection PubMed
description In this article, we consider the one‐year review (OYR) by Parliament of temporary powers in the Coronavirus Act 2020 (CVA). The OYR stands as a key concession on the part of the UK government to enable scrutiny of Covid‐19 law making, after the CVA was rushed through Parliament at the beginning of the pandemic. The principal argument of this article is that despite appearances, this review was another example of Parliament being marginalised during the Covid‐19 pandemic. In particular, there were four obstacles to meaningful scrutiny in the OYR: inadequate parliamentary time scheduled for the review; the ‘all‐or‐nothing’ framing of the review; late and inaccurate government reporting prior to the OYR; and the failure to address key issues regarding the operation of the CVA, including major human rights concerns. In light of such obstruction to scrutiny, it is clear that the review represents a broken promise on the part of the current government to Parliament. The review is also part of a broader pattern of marginalising Parliament during the pandemic. In presenting this analysis, we argue that two changes could be made in the upcoming and penultimate review of the CVA in September 2021, in order to enable Parliament to engage in meaningful scrutiny in this review.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8441824
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Blackwell Publishing Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84418242021-09-15 Parliament's One‐Year Review of the Coronavirus Act 2020: Another Example of Parliament's Marginalisation in the Covid‐19 Pandemic Lock, Daniella Hidalgo, Pablo Grez de Londras, Fiona Polit Q Articles In this article, we consider the one‐year review (OYR) by Parliament of temporary powers in the Coronavirus Act 2020 (CVA). The OYR stands as a key concession on the part of the UK government to enable scrutiny of Covid‐19 law making, after the CVA was rushed through Parliament at the beginning of the pandemic. The principal argument of this article is that despite appearances, this review was another example of Parliament being marginalised during the Covid‐19 pandemic. In particular, there were four obstacles to meaningful scrutiny in the OYR: inadequate parliamentary time scheduled for the review; the ‘all‐or‐nothing’ framing of the review; late and inaccurate government reporting prior to the OYR; and the failure to address key issues regarding the operation of the CVA, including major human rights concerns. In light of such obstruction to scrutiny, it is clear that the review represents a broken promise on the part of the current government to Parliament. The review is also part of a broader pattern of marginalising Parliament during the pandemic. In presenting this analysis, we argue that two changes could be made in the upcoming and penultimate review of the CVA in September 2021, in order to enable Parliament to engage in meaningful scrutiny in this review. Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2021-08-13 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8441824/ /pubmed/34538934 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-923X.13048 Text en © 2021 The Authors. The Political Quarterly published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Political Quarterly Publishing Co (PQPC). https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Articles
Lock, Daniella
Hidalgo, Pablo Grez
de Londras, Fiona
Parliament's One‐Year Review of the Coronavirus Act 2020: Another Example of Parliament's Marginalisation in the Covid‐19 Pandemic
title Parliament's One‐Year Review of the Coronavirus Act 2020: Another Example of Parliament's Marginalisation in the Covid‐19 Pandemic
title_full Parliament's One‐Year Review of the Coronavirus Act 2020: Another Example of Parliament's Marginalisation in the Covid‐19 Pandemic
title_fullStr Parliament's One‐Year Review of the Coronavirus Act 2020: Another Example of Parliament's Marginalisation in the Covid‐19 Pandemic
title_full_unstemmed Parliament's One‐Year Review of the Coronavirus Act 2020: Another Example of Parliament's Marginalisation in the Covid‐19 Pandemic
title_short Parliament's One‐Year Review of the Coronavirus Act 2020: Another Example of Parliament's Marginalisation in the Covid‐19 Pandemic
title_sort parliament's one‐year review of the coronavirus act 2020: another example of parliament's marginalisation in the covid‐19 pandemic
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8441824/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34538934
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-923X.13048
work_keys_str_mv AT lockdaniella parliamentsoneyearreviewofthecoronavirusact2020anotherexampleofparliamentsmarginalisationinthecovid19pandemic
AT hidalgopablogrez parliamentsoneyearreviewofthecoronavirusact2020anotherexampleofparliamentsmarginalisationinthecovid19pandemic
AT delondrasfiona parliamentsoneyearreviewofthecoronavirusact2020anotherexampleofparliamentsmarginalisationinthecovid19pandemic