Cargando…

Improving the continuity and coordination of ambulatory care through feedback and facilitated dialogue—a study protocol for a cluster-randomised trial to evaluate the ACD study (Accountable Care in Germany)

BACKGROUND: Patients in Germany are free to seek care from any office-based physician and can always ask for multiple opinions on a diagnosis or treatment. The high density of physicians and the freedom to choose among them without referrals have led to a need for better coordination between the mul...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sundmacher, Leonie, Flemming, Ronja, Leve, Verena, Geiger, Isabel, Franke, Sebastian, Czihal, Thomas, Krause, Clemens, Wiese, Birgitt, Meyer, Frank, Brittner, Matthias, Pollmanns, Johannes, Martin, Johannes, Brandenburg, Paul, Schultz, Annemarie, Brua, Emmanuelle, Schneider, Udo, Dortmann, Olga, Rupprecht, Christoph, Wilm, Stefan, Schüttig, Wiebke
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8441947/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34526088
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-021-05584-z
_version_ 1783752925861904384
author Sundmacher, Leonie
Flemming, Ronja
Leve, Verena
Geiger, Isabel
Franke, Sebastian
Czihal, Thomas
Krause, Clemens
Wiese, Birgitt
Meyer, Frank
Brittner, Matthias
Pollmanns, Johannes
Martin, Johannes
Brandenburg, Paul
Schultz, Annemarie
Brua, Emmanuelle
Schneider, Udo
Dortmann, Olga
Rupprecht, Christoph
Wilm, Stefan
Schüttig, Wiebke
author_facet Sundmacher, Leonie
Flemming, Ronja
Leve, Verena
Geiger, Isabel
Franke, Sebastian
Czihal, Thomas
Krause, Clemens
Wiese, Birgitt
Meyer, Frank
Brittner, Matthias
Pollmanns, Johannes
Martin, Johannes
Brandenburg, Paul
Schultz, Annemarie
Brua, Emmanuelle
Schneider, Udo
Dortmann, Olga
Rupprecht, Christoph
Wilm, Stefan
Schüttig, Wiebke
author_sort Sundmacher, Leonie
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Patients in Germany are free to seek care from any office-based physician and can always ask for multiple opinions on a diagnosis or treatment. The high density of physicians and the freedom to choose among them without referrals have led to a need for better coordination between the multiple health professionals treating any given patient. The objectives of this study are to (1) identify informal networks of physicians who treat the same patient population, (2) provide these physicians with feedback on their network and patients, using routine data and (3) give the physicians the opportunity to meet one another in facilitated network meetings. METHODS: The Accountable Care Deutschland (ACD) study is a prospective, non-blinded, cluster-randomised trial comprising a process and economic evaluation of informal networks among 12,525 GPs and office-based specialists and their 1.9 million patients. The units of allocation are the informal networks, which will be randomised either to the intervention (feedback and facilitated meetings) or control group (usual care). The informal networks will be generated by identifying connections between office-based physicians using complete datasets from the Regional Associations of Statutory Health Insurance (SHI) Physicians in Hamburg, Schleswig Holstein, North Rhine and Westphalia Lip, as well as data from three large statutory health insurers in Germany. The physicians will (a) receive feedback on selected indicators of their own treatment activity and that of the colleagues in their network and (b) will be invited to voluntary, facilitated network meetings by their Regional Association of SHI physicians. The primary outcome will be ambulatory-care-sensitive hospitalisations at baseline, at the end of the 2-year intervention period, and at six months and at 12 months after the end of the intervention period. Data will be analysed using the intention-to-treat principle. A pilot study preceded the ACD study. DISCUSSION: Cochrane reviews show that feedback can improve everyday medical practice by shedding light on previously unknown relationships. Providing physicians with information on how they are connected with their colleagues and what the outcomes are of care delivered within their informal networks can help them make these improvements, as well as strengthen their awareness of possible discontinuities in the care they provide. TRIAL REGISTRATION: German Clinical Trials Register DRKS00020884. Registered on 25 March 2020—retrospectively registered. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13063-021-05584-z.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8441947
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84419472021-09-15 Improving the continuity and coordination of ambulatory care through feedback and facilitated dialogue—a study protocol for a cluster-randomised trial to evaluate the ACD study (Accountable Care in Germany) Sundmacher, Leonie Flemming, Ronja Leve, Verena Geiger, Isabel Franke, Sebastian Czihal, Thomas Krause, Clemens Wiese, Birgitt Meyer, Frank Brittner, Matthias Pollmanns, Johannes Martin, Johannes Brandenburg, Paul Schultz, Annemarie Brua, Emmanuelle Schneider, Udo Dortmann, Olga Rupprecht, Christoph Wilm, Stefan Schüttig, Wiebke Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Patients in Germany are free to seek care from any office-based physician and can always ask for multiple opinions on a diagnosis or treatment. The high density of physicians and the freedom to choose among them without referrals have led to a need for better coordination between the multiple health professionals treating any given patient. The objectives of this study are to (1) identify informal networks of physicians who treat the same patient population, (2) provide these physicians with feedback on their network and patients, using routine data and (3) give the physicians the opportunity to meet one another in facilitated network meetings. METHODS: The Accountable Care Deutschland (ACD) study is a prospective, non-blinded, cluster-randomised trial comprising a process and economic evaluation of informal networks among 12,525 GPs and office-based specialists and their 1.9 million patients. The units of allocation are the informal networks, which will be randomised either to the intervention (feedback and facilitated meetings) or control group (usual care). The informal networks will be generated by identifying connections between office-based physicians using complete datasets from the Regional Associations of Statutory Health Insurance (SHI) Physicians in Hamburg, Schleswig Holstein, North Rhine and Westphalia Lip, as well as data from three large statutory health insurers in Germany. The physicians will (a) receive feedback on selected indicators of their own treatment activity and that of the colleagues in their network and (b) will be invited to voluntary, facilitated network meetings by their Regional Association of SHI physicians. The primary outcome will be ambulatory-care-sensitive hospitalisations at baseline, at the end of the 2-year intervention period, and at six months and at 12 months after the end of the intervention period. Data will be analysed using the intention-to-treat principle. A pilot study preceded the ACD study. DISCUSSION: Cochrane reviews show that feedback can improve everyday medical practice by shedding light on previously unknown relationships. Providing physicians with information on how they are connected with their colleagues and what the outcomes are of care delivered within their informal networks can help them make these improvements, as well as strengthen their awareness of possible discontinuities in the care they provide. TRIAL REGISTRATION: German Clinical Trials Register DRKS00020884. Registered on 25 March 2020—retrospectively registered. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13063-021-05584-z. BioMed Central 2021-09-15 /pmc/articles/PMC8441947/ /pubmed/34526088 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-021-05584-z Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Sundmacher, Leonie
Flemming, Ronja
Leve, Verena
Geiger, Isabel
Franke, Sebastian
Czihal, Thomas
Krause, Clemens
Wiese, Birgitt
Meyer, Frank
Brittner, Matthias
Pollmanns, Johannes
Martin, Johannes
Brandenburg, Paul
Schultz, Annemarie
Brua, Emmanuelle
Schneider, Udo
Dortmann, Olga
Rupprecht, Christoph
Wilm, Stefan
Schüttig, Wiebke
Improving the continuity and coordination of ambulatory care through feedback and facilitated dialogue—a study protocol for a cluster-randomised trial to evaluate the ACD study (Accountable Care in Germany)
title Improving the continuity and coordination of ambulatory care through feedback and facilitated dialogue—a study protocol for a cluster-randomised trial to evaluate the ACD study (Accountable Care in Germany)
title_full Improving the continuity and coordination of ambulatory care through feedback and facilitated dialogue—a study protocol for a cluster-randomised trial to evaluate the ACD study (Accountable Care in Germany)
title_fullStr Improving the continuity and coordination of ambulatory care through feedback and facilitated dialogue—a study protocol for a cluster-randomised trial to evaluate the ACD study (Accountable Care in Germany)
title_full_unstemmed Improving the continuity and coordination of ambulatory care through feedback and facilitated dialogue—a study protocol for a cluster-randomised trial to evaluate the ACD study (Accountable Care in Germany)
title_short Improving the continuity and coordination of ambulatory care through feedback and facilitated dialogue—a study protocol for a cluster-randomised trial to evaluate the ACD study (Accountable Care in Germany)
title_sort improving the continuity and coordination of ambulatory care through feedback and facilitated dialogue—a study protocol for a cluster-randomised trial to evaluate the acd study (accountable care in germany)
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8441947/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34526088
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-021-05584-z
work_keys_str_mv AT sundmacherleonie improvingthecontinuityandcoordinationofambulatorycarethroughfeedbackandfacilitateddialogueastudyprotocolforaclusterrandomisedtrialtoevaluatetheacdstudyaccountablecareingermany
AT flemmingronja improvingthecontinuityandcoordinationofambulatorycarethroughfeedbackandfacilitateddialogueastudyprotocolforaclusterrandomisedtrialtoevaluatetheacdstudyaccountablecareingermany
AT leveverena improvingthecontinuityandcoordinationofambulatorycarethroughfeedbackandfacilitateddialogueastudyprotocolforaclusterrandomisedtrialtoevaluatetheacdstudyaccountablecareingermany
AT geigerisabel improvingthecontinuityandcoordinationofambulatorycarethroughfeedbackandfacilitateddialogueastudyprotocolforaclusterrandomisedtrialtoevaluatetheacdstudyaccountablecareingermany
AT frankesebastian improvingthecontinuityandcoordinationofambulatorycarethroughfeedbackandfacilitateddialogueastudyprotocolforaclusterrandomisedtrialtoevaluatetheacdstudyaccountablecareingermany
AT czihalthomas improvingthecontinuityandcoordinationofambulatorycarethroughfeedbackandfacilitateddialogueastudyprotocolforaclusterrandomisedtrialtoevaluatetheacdstudyaccountablecareingermany
AT krauseclemens improvingthecontinuityandcoordinationofambulatorycarethroughfeedbackandfacilitateddialogueastudyprotocolforaclusterrandomisedtrialtoevaluatetheacdstudyaccountablecareingermany
AT wiesebirgitt improvingthecontinuityandcoordinationofambulatorycarethroughfeedbackandfacilitateddialogueastudyprotocolforaclusterrandomisedtrialtoevaluatetheacdstudyaccountablecareingermany
AT meyerfrank improvingthecontinuityandcoordinationofambulatorycarethroughfeedbackandfacilitateddialogueastudyprotocolforaclusterrandomisedtrialtoevaluatetheacdstudyaccountablecareingermany
AT brittnermatthias improvingthecontinuityandcoordinationofambulatorycarethroughfeedbackandfacilitateddialogueastudyprotocolforaclusterrandomisedtrialtoevaluatetheacdstudyaccountablecareingermany
AT pollmannsjohannes improvingthecontinuityandcoordinationofambulatorycarethroughfeedbackandfacilitateddialogueastudyprotocolforaclusterrandomisedtrialtoevaluatetheacdstudyaccountablecareingermany
AT martinjohannes improvingthecontinuityandcoordinationofambulatorycarethroughfeedbackandfacilitateddialogueastudyprotocolforaclusterrandomisedtrialtoevaluatetheacdstudyaccountablecareingermany
AT brandenburgpaul improvingthecontinuityandcoordinationofambulatorycarethroughfeedbackandfacilitateddialogueastudyprotocolforaclusterrandomisedtrialtoevaluatetheacdstudyaccountablecareingermany
AT schultzannemarie improvingthecontinuityandcoordinationofambulatorycarethroughfeedbackandfacilitateddialogueastudyprotocolforaclusterrandomisedtrialtoevaluatetheacdstudyaccountablecareingermany
AT bruaemmanuelle improvingthecontinuityandcoordinationofambulatorycarethroughfeedbackandfacilitateddialogueastudyprotocolforaclusterrandomisedtrialtoevaluatetheacdstudyaccountablecareingermany
AT schneiderudo improvingthecontinuityandcoordinationofambulatorycarethroughfeedbackandfacilitateddialogueastudyprotocolforaclusterrandomisedtrialtoevaluatetheacdstudyaccountablecareingermany
AT dortmannolga improvingthecontinuityandcoordinationofambulatorycarethroughfeedbackandfacilitateddialogueastudyprotocolforaclusterrandomisedtrialtoevaluatetheacdstudyaccountablecareingermany
AT rupprechtchristoph improvingthecontinuityandcoordinationofambulatorycarethroughfeedbackandfacilitateddialogueastudyprotocolforaclusterrandomisedtrialtoevaluatetheacdstudyaccountablecareingermany
AT wilmstefan improvingthecontinuityandcoordinationofambulatorycarethroughfeedbackandfacilitateddialogueastudyprotocolforaclusterrandomisedtrialtoevaluatetheacdstudyaccountablecareingermany
AT schuttigwiebke improvingthecontinuityandcoordinationofambulatorycarethroughfeedbackandfacilitateddialogueastudyprotocolforaclusterrandomisedtrialtoevaluatetheacdstudyaccountablecareingermany