Cargando…

Paired Multiple-Choice Questions Reveal Students’ Incomplete Statistical Thinking about Variation during Data Analysis

Biologists consider variability during biological investigations. A robust quantitative understanding of variability is particularly important during data analysis, where statistics are used to quantify variation and draw conclusions about phenomena while accounting for variation. Many students stru...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hicks, Jenna, Dewey, Jessica, Abebe, Michael, Brandvain, Yaniv, Schuchardt, Anita
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Society for Microbiology 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8442028/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34594461
http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/jmbe.00112-21
_version_ 1783752943057502208
author Hicks, Jenna
Dewey, Jessica
Abebe, Michael
Brandvain, Yaniv
Schuchardt, Anita
author_facet Hicks, Jenna
Dewey, Jessica
Abebe, Michael
Brandvain, Yaniv
Schuchardt, Anita
author_sort Hicks, Jenna
collection PubMed
description Biologists consider variability during biological investigations. A robust quantitative understanding of variability is particularly important during data analysis, where statistics are used to quantify variation and draw conclusions about phenomena while accounting for variation. Many students struggle to correctly apply a quantitative understanding of variation to statistically analyze data. We present quantitative and qualitative analyses of introductory biology students’ responses on two pairs of multiple-choice questions querying two concepts related to the quantitative analysis of variation. More students correctly identify a mathematical expression of variation than correctly interpret it. Many students correctly interpret a nonsignificant p-value in the context of a very small sample size, but fewer students do so in the context of a large sample size. These results imply that many students have an incomplete quantitative understanding of variation. These findings suggest that instruction focusing on conceptual understanding, not procedural problem solving, may elevate students’ quantitative understanding of variation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8442028
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher American Society for Microbiology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84420282021-09-29 Paired Multiple-Choice Questions Reveal Students’ Incomplete Statistical Thinking about Variation during Data Analysis Hicks, Jenna Dewey, Jessica Abebe, Michael Brandvain, Yaniv Schuchardt, Anita J Microbiol Biol Educ Research Article Biologists consider variability during biological investigations. A robust quantitative understanding of variability is particularly important during data analysis, where statistics are used to quantify variation and draw conclusions about phenomena while accounting for variation. Many students struggle to correctly apply a quantitative understanding of variation to statistically analyze data. We present quantitative and qualitative analyses of introductory biology students’ responses on two pairs of multiple-choice questions querying two concepts related to the quantitative analysis of variation. More students correctly identify a mathematical expression of variation than correctly interpret it. Many students correctly interpret a nonsignificant p-value in the context of a very small sample size, but fewer students do so in the context of a large sample size. These results imply that many students have an incomplete quantitative understanding of variation. These findings suggest that instruction focusing on conceptual understanding, not procedural problem solving, may elevate students’ quantitative understanding of variation. American Society for Microbiology 2021-05-31 /pmc/articles/PMC8442028/ /pubmed/34594461 http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/jmbe.00112-21 Text en Copyright © 2021 Hicks et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Research Article
Hicks, Jenna
Dewey, Jessica
Abebe, Michael
Brandvain, Yaniv
Schuchardt, Anita
Paired Multiple-Choice Questions Reveal Students’ Incomplete Statistical Thinking about Variation during Data Analysis
title Paired Multiple-Choice Questions Reveal Students’ Incomplete Statistical Thinking about Variation during Data Analysis
title_full Paired Multiple-Choice Questions Reveal Students’ Incomplete Statistical Thinking about Variation during Data Analysis
title_fullStr Paired Multiple-Choice Questions Reveal Students’ Incomplete Statistical Thinking about Variation during Data Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Paired Multiple-Choice Questions Reveal Students’ Incomplete Statistical Thinking about Variation during Data Analysis
title_short Paired Multiple-Choice Questions Reveal Students’ Incomplete Statistical Thinking about Variation during Data Analysis
title_sort paired multiple-choice questions reveal students’ incomplete statistical thinking about variation during data analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8442028/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34594461
http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/jmbe.00112-21
work_keys_str_mv AT hicksjenna pairedmultiplechoicequestionsrevealstudentsincompletestatisticalthinkingaboutvariationduringdataanalysis
AT deweyjessica pairedmultiplechoicequestionsrevealstudentsincompletestatisticalthinkingaboutvariationduringdataanalysis
AT abebemichael pairedmultiplechoicequestionsrevealstudentsincompletestatisticalthinkingaboutvariationduringdataanalysis
AT brandvainyaniv pairedmultiplechoicequestionsrevealstudentsincompletestatisticalthinkingaboutvariationduringdataanalysis
AT schuchardtanita pairedmultiplechoicequestionsrevealstudentsincompletestatisticalthinkingaboutvariationduringdataanalysis