Cargando…
Paired Multiple-Choice Questions Reveal Students’ Incomplete Statistical Thinking about Variation during Data Analysis
Biologists consider variability during biological investigations. A robust quantitative understanding of variability is particularly important during data analysis, where statistics are used to quantify variation and draw conclusions about phenomena while accounting for variation. Many students stru...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Society for Microbiology
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8442028/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34594461 http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/jmbe.00112-21 |
_version_ | 1783752943057502208 |
---|---|
author | Hicks, Jenna Dewey, Jessica Abebe, Michael Brandvain, Yaniv Schuchardt, Anita |
author_facet | Hicks, Jenna Dewey, Jessica Abebe, Michael Brandvain, Yaniv Schuchardt, Anita |
author_sort | Hicks, Jenna |
collection | PubMed |
description | Biologists consider variability during biological investigations. A robust quantitative understanding of variability is particularly important during data analysis, where statistics are used to quantify variation and draw conclusions about phenomena while accounting for variation. Many students struggle to correctly apply a quantitative understanding of variation to statistically analyze data. We present quantitative and qualitative analyses of introductory biology students’ responses on two pairs of multiple-choice questions querying two concepts related to the quantitative analysis of variation. More students correctly identify a mathematical expression of variation than correctly interpret it. Many students correctly interpret a nonsignificant p-value in the context of a very small sample size, but fewer students do so in the context of a large sample size. These results imply that many students have an incomplete quantitative understanding of variation. These findings suggest that instruction focusing on conceptual understanding, not procedural problem solving, may elevate students’ quantitative understanding of variation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8442028 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | American Society for Microbiology |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84420282021-09-29 Paired Multiple-Choice Questions Reveal Students’ Incomplete Statistical Thinking about Variation during Data Analysis Hicks, Jenna Dewey, Jessica Abebe, Michael Brandvain, Yaniv Schuchardt, Anita J Microbiol Biol Educ Research Article Biologists consider variability during biological investigations. A robust quantitative understanding of variability is particularly important during data analysis, where statistics are used to quantify variation and draw conclusions about phenomena while accounting for variation. Many students struggle to correctly apply a quantitative understanding of variation to statistically analyze data. We present quantitative and qualitative analyses of introductory biology students’ responses on two pairs of multiple-choice questions querying two concepts related to the quantitative analysis of variation. More students correctly identify a mathematical expression of variation than correctly interpret it. Many students correctly interpret a nonsignificant p-value in the context of a very small sample size, but fewer students do so in the context of a large sample size. These results imply that many students have an incomplete quantitative understanding of variation. These findings suggest that instruction focusing on conceptual understanding, not procedural problem solving, may elevate students’ quantitative understanding of variation. American Society for Microbiology 2021-05-31 /pmc/articles/PMC8442028/ /pubmed/34594461 http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/jmbe.00112-21 Text en Copyright © 2021 Hicks et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Research Article Hicks, Jenna Dewey, Jessica Abebe, Michael Brandvain, Yaniv Schuchardt, Anita Paired Multiple-Choice Questions Reveal Students’ Incomplete Statistical Thinking about Variation during Data Analysis |
title | Paired Multiple-Choice Questions Reveal Students’ Incomplete Statistical Thinking about Variation during Data Analysis |
title_full | Paired Multiple-Choice Questions Reveal Students’ Incomplete Statistical Thinking about Variation during Data Analysis |
title_fullStr | Paired Multiple-Choice Questions Reveal Students’ Incomplete Statistical Thinking about Variation during Data Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Paired Multiple-Choice Questions Reveal Students’ Incomplete Statistical Thinking about Variation during Data Analysis |
title_short | Paired Multiple-Choice Questions Reveal Students’ Incomplete Statistical Thinking about Variation during Data Analysis |
title_sort | paired multiple-choice questions reveal students’ incomplete statistical thinking about variation during data analysis |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8442028/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34594461 http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/jmbe.00112-21 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hicksjenna pairedmultiplechoicequestionsrevealstudentsincompletestatisticalthinkingaboutvariationduringdataanalysis AT deweyjessica pairedmultiplechoicequestionsrevealstudentsincompletestatisticalthinkingaboutvariationduringdataanalysis AT abebemichael pairedmultiplechoicequestionsrevealstudentsincompletestatisticalthinkingaboutvariationduringdataanalysis AT brandvainyaniv pairedmultiplechoicequestionsrevealstudentsincompletestatisticalthinkingaboutvariationduringdataanalysis AT schuchardtanita pairedmultiplechoicequestionsrevealstudentsincompletestatisticalthinkingaboutvariationduringdataanalysis |