Cargando…
Assessing treatment effects and publication bias across different specialties in medicine: a meta-epidemiological study
OBJECTIVES: To assess the prevalence of statistically significant treatment effects, adverse events and small-study effects (when small studies report more extreme results than large studies) and publication bias (over-reporting of statistically significant results) across medical specialties. DESIG...
Autores principales: | Schwab, Simon, Kreiliger, Giuachin, Held, Leonhard |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8442042/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34521659 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045942 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Development of a specialty intensity score to estimate a patient's need for care coordination across physician specialties
por: Hodgson, Ashley, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Brief Report: Negative Controls to Detect Selection Bias and Measurement Bias in Epidemiologic Studies
por: Arnold, Benjamin F., et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
Meta-epidemiology
por: Bae, Jong-Myon
Publicado: (2014) -
Does NIH funding differ between medical specialties? A longitudinal analysis of NIH grant data by specialty and type of grant, 2011–2020
por: Schlafly, Andrew, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Universal Difference-in-Differences for Causal Inference in Epidemiology
por: Tchetgen Tchetgen, Eric J., et al.
Publicado: (2023)