Cargando…

Development and testing of the shared decision-making attitudes scale among nurses in Taiwan: a cross-sectional scale development study

OBJECTIVE: Shared decision-making (SDM) enhances medical care, but an appropriate tool for evaluating nursing staff’s attitudes towards SDM in clinical practice is lacking. The objective of this study is to develop the Nursing Shared Decision-Making Attitude (NSDMA) scale and verify its psychometric...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hsu, Hsiu-Chin, Lin, Shu-Chuan, Lee, Yu-Hsia, Wu, Hon-Yen, Wang, Pao-Yu, Li, Jiun-Yi, Lin, Mei-Hsiang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8442060/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34521656
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044733
_version_ 1783752948257390592
author Hsu, Hsiu-Chin
Lin, Shu-Chuan
Lee, Yu-Hsia
Wu, Hon-Yen
Wang, Pao-Yu
Li, Jiun-Yi
Lin, Mei-Hsiang
author_facet Hsu, Hsiu-Chin
Lin, Shu-Chuan
Lee, Yu-Hsia
Wu, Hon-Yen
Wang, Pao-Yu
Li, Jiun-Yi
Lin, Mei-Hsiang
author_sort Hsu, Hsiu-Chin
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Shared decision-making (SDM) enhances medical care, but an appropriate tool for evaluating nursing staff’s attitudes towards SDM in clinical practice is lacking. The objective of this study is to develop the Nursing Shared Decision-Making Attitude (NSDMA) scale and verify its psychometric properties. DESIGN: Instrument design study. PARTICIPANTS: A sample of 451 nursing staff. INTERVENTION: This study comprised two phases. In phase 1, qualitative research and expert content validity were adopted to develop the first draft of the scale. In phase 2, Taiwanese nursing staff were recruited through convenience sampling, and the sample was divided into a calibration sample and a validation sample. An objective structured clinical examination of SDM attitudes was administered to 100 nursing staff to determine the scale’s cut-off score. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis were used to obtain the underlying factors of the NSDMA scale; McDonald’s omega value was used to determine the reliability; known-group validity was used to test the construct validity; and the receiver operating characteristic curve was adopted to determine the scale’s cut-off score. RESULTS: In total, two factors were identified from the instrument results, which were termed ‘empathic communication’ and ‘mastery learning’. The McDonald’s omega value of the overall scale was 0.92. Known-group validity testing was performed based on the staff’s participation in SDM courses and experience of SDM, and the results exhibited significant differences (t=5.49, p<0.001; t=2.43, p<0.05). Based on the receiver operating characteristic curve, the optimal cut-off for SDM attitudes was determined as 48.5 points. CONCLUSIONS: The NSDMA scale enables the evaluation of SDM attitudes among clinical nursing staff and nursing managers; the results may serve as a reference for incorporation of SDM into nursing policy formulation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8442060
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84420602021-09-29 Development and testing of the shared decision-making attitudes scale among nurses in Taiwan: a cross-sectional scale development study Hsu, Hsiu-Chin Lin, Shu-Chuan Lee, Yu-Hsia Wu, Hon-Yen Wang, Pao-Yu Li, Jiun-Yi Lin, Mei-Hsiang BMJ Open Nursing OBJECTIVE: Shared decision-making (SDM) enhances medical care, but an appropriate tool for evaluating nursing staff’s attitudes towards SDM in clinical practice is lacking. The objective of this study is to develop the Nursing Shared Decision-Making Attitude (NSDMA) scale and verify its psychometric properties. DESIGN: Instrument design study. PARTICIPANTS: A sample of 451 nursing staff. INTERVENTION: This study comprised two phases. In phase 1, qualitative research and expert content validity were adopted to develop the first draft of the scale. In phase 2, Taiwanese nursing staff were recruited through convenience sampling, and the sample was divided into a calibration sample and a validation sample. An objective structured clinical examination of SDM attitudes was administered to 100 nursing staff to determine the scale’s cut-off score. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis were used to obtain the underlying factors of the NSDMA scale; McDonald’s omega value was used to determine the reliability; known-group validity was used to test the construct validity; and the receiver operating characteristic curve was adopted to determine the scale’s cut-off score. RESULTS: In total, two factors were identified from the instrument results, which were termed ‘empathic communication’ and ‘mastery learning’. The McDonald’s omega value of the overall scale was 0.92. Known-group validity testing was performed based on the staff’s participation in SDM courses and experience of SDM, and the results exhibited significant differences (t=5.49, p<0.001; t=2.43, p<0.05). Based on the receiver operating characteristic curve, the optimal cut-off for SDM attitudes was determined as 48.5 points. CONCLUSIONS: The NSDMA scale enables the evaluation of SDM attitudes among clinical nursing staff and nursing managers; the results may serve as a reference for incorporation of SDM into nursing policy formulation. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-09-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8442060/ /pubmed/34521656 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044733 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Nursing
Hsu, Hsiu-Chin
Lin, Shu-Chuan
Lee, Yu-Hsia
Wu, Hon-Yen
Wang, Pao-Yu
Li, Jiun-Yi
Lin, Mei-Hsiang
Development and testing of the shared decision-making attitudes scale among nurses in Taiwan: a cross-sectional scale development study
title Development and testing of the shared decision-making attitudes scale among nurses in Taiwan: a cross-sectional scale development study
title_full Development and testing of the shared decision-making attitudes scale among nurses in Taiwan: a cross-sectional scale development study
title_fullStr Development and testing of the shared decision-making attitudes scale among nurses in Taiwan: a cross-sectional scale development study
title_full_unstemmed Development and testing of the shared decision-making attitudes scale among nurses in Taiwan: a cross-sectional scale development study
title_short Development and testing of the shared decision-making attitudes scale among nurses in Taiwan: a cross-sectional scale development study
title_sort development and testing of the shared decision-making attitudes scale among nurses in taiwan: a cross-sectional scale development study
topic Nursing
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8442060/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34521656
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044733
work_keys_str_mv AT hsuhsiuchin developmentandtestingoftheshareddecisionmakingattitudesscaleamongnursesintaiwanacrosssectionalscaledevelopmentstudy
AT linshuchuan developmentandtestingoftheshareddecisionmakingattitudesscaleamongnursesintaiwanacrosssectionalscaledevelopmentstudy
AT leeyuhsia developmentandtestingoftheshareddecisionmakingattitudesscaleamongnursesintaiwanacrosssectionalscaledevelopmentstudy
AT wuhonyen developmentandtestingoftheshareddecisionmakingattitudesscaleamongnursesintaiwanacrosssectionalscaledevelopmentstudy
AT wangpaoyu developmentandtestingoftheshareddecisionmakingattitudesscaleamongnursesintaiwanacrosssectionalscaledevelopmentstudy
AT lijiunyi developmentandtestingoftheshareddecisionmakingattitudesscaleamongnursesintaiwanacrosssectionalscaledevelopmentstudy
AT linmeihsiang developmentandtestingoftheshareddecisionmakingattitudesscaleamongnursesintaiwanacrosssectionalscaledevelopmentstudy