Cargando…
Evaluation of the performance of 25 SARS-CoV-2 serological rapid diagnostic tests using a reference panel of plasma specimens at the Uganda Virus Research Institute
INTRODUCTION: Serological testing is needed to better understand the epidemiology of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) virus. Rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) have been developed to detect specific antibodies, IgM and IgG, to the virus. The performance of 25 of these RDTs...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of International Society for Infectious Diseases.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8442260/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34536612 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2021.09.020 |
_version_ | 1783752973925482496 |
---|---|
author | Lutalo, Tom Nalumansi, Aminah Olara, Denis Kayiwa, John Ogwang, Bernard Odwilo, Emmanuel Watera, Christine Balinandi, Stephen Kiconco, Jocelyn Nakaseegu, Joweria Serwanga, Jennifer Kikaire, Bernard Ssemwanga, Deogratius Abiko, Brendah Nsereko, Christopher Cotten, Matthew Buule, Joshua Lutwama, Julius Downing, Robert Kaleebu, Pontiano |
author_facet | Lutalo, Tom Nalumansi, Aminah Olara, Denis Kayiwa, John Ogwang, Bernard Odwilo, Emmanuel Watera, Christine Balinandi, Stephen Kiconco, Jocelyn Nakaseegu, Joweria Serwanga, Jennifer Kikaire, Bernard Ssemwanga, Deogratius Abiko, Brendah Nsereko, Christopher Cotten, Matthew Buule, Joshua Lutwama, Julius Downing, Robert Kaleebu, Pontiano |
author_sort | Lutalo, Tom |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Serological testing is needed to better understand the epidemiology of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) virus. Rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) have been developed to detect specific antibodies, IgM and IgG, to the virus. The performance of 25 of these RDTs was evaluated. METHODS: A serological reference panel of 50 positive and 100 negative plasma specimens was developed from SARS-CoV-2 PCR and antibody positive patients and pre-pandemic SARS-CoV-2-negative specimens collected in 2016. Test performance of the 25 RDTs was evaluated against this panel. RESULTS: A total of 10 RDTs had a sensitivity ≥98%, while 13 RDTs had a specificity ≥98% to anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies. Four RDTs (Boson, MultiG, Standard Q, and VivaDiag) had both sensitivity and specificity ≥98% to anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies. Only three RDTs had a sensitivity ≥98%, while 10 RDTs had a specificity ≥98% to anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgM antibodies. Three RDTs (Autobio, MultiG, and Standard Q) had sensitivity and specificity ≥98% to combined IgG/IgM. The RDTs that performed well also had perfect or almost perfect inter-reader agreement. CONCLUSIONS: This evaluation identified three RDTs with a sensitivity and specificity to IgM/IgG antibodies of ≥98% with the potential for widespread antibody testing in Uganda. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8442260 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of International Society for Infectious Diseases. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84422602021-09-15 Evaluation of the performance of 25 SARS-CoV-2 serological rapid diagnostic tests using a reference panel of plasma specimens at the Uganda Virus Research Institute Lutalo, Tom Nalumansi, Aminah Olara, Denis Kayiwa, John Ogwang, Bernard Odwilo, Emmanuel Watera, Christine Balinandi, Stephen Kiconco, Jocelyn Nakaseegu, Joweria Serwanga, Jennifer Kikaire, Bernard Ssemwanga, Deogratius Abiko, Brendah Nsereko, Christopher Cotten, Matthew Buule, Joshua Lutwama, Julius Downing, Robert Kaleebu, Pontiano Int J Infect Dis Article INTRODUCTION: Serological testing is needed to better understand the epidemiology of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) virus. Rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) have been developed to detect specific antibodies, IgM and IgG, to the virus. The performance of 25 of these RDTs was evaluated. METHODS: A serological reference panel of 50 positive and 100 negative plasma specimens was developed from SARS-CoV-2 PCR and antibody positive patients and pre-pandemic SARS-CoV-2-negative specimens collected in 2016. Test performance of the 25 RDTs was evaluated against this panel. RESULTS: A total of 10 RDTs had a sensitivity ≥98%, while 13 RDTs had a specificity ≥98% to anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies. Four RDTs (Boson, MultiG, Standard Q, and VivaDiag) had both sensitivity and specificity ≥98% to anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies. Only three RDTs had a sensitivity ≥98%, while 10 RDTs had a specificity ≥98% to anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgM antibodies. Three RDTs (Autobio, MultiG, and Standard Q) had sensitivity and specificity ≥98% to combined IgG/IgM. The RDTs that performed well also had perfect or almost perfect inter-reader agreement. CONCLUSIONS: This evaluation identified three RDTs with a sensitivity and specificity to IgM/IgG antibodies of ≥98% with the potential for widespread antibody testing in Uganda. Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of International Society for Infectious Diseases. 2021-11 2021-09-15 /pmc/articles/PMC8442260/ /pubmed/34536612 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2021.09.020 Text en Crown Copyright © 2021 Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of International Society for Infectious Diseases. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
spellingShingle | Article Lutalo, Tom Nalumansi, Aminah Olara, Denis Kayiwa, John Ogwang, Bernard Odwilo, Emmanuel Watera, Christine Balinandi, Stephen Kiconco, Jocelyn Nakaseegu, Joweria Serwanga, Jennifer Kikaire, Bernard Ssemwanga, Deogratius Abiko, Brendah Nsereko, Christopher Cotten, Matthew Buule, Joshua Lutwama, Julius Downing, Robert Kaleebu, Pontiano Evaluation of the performance of 25 SARS-CoV-2 serological rapid diagnostic tests using a reference panel of plasma specimens at the Uganda Virus Research Institute |
title | Evaluation of the performance of 25 SARS-CoV-2 serological rapid diagnostic tests using a reference panel of plasma specimens at the Uganda Virus Research Institute |
title_full | Evaluation of the performance of 25 SARS-CoV-2 serological rapid diagnostic tests using a reference panel of plasma specimens at the Uganda Virus Research Institute |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of the performance of 25 SARS-CoV-2 serological rapid diagnostic tests using a reference panel of plasma specimens at the Uganda Virus Research Institute |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of the performance of 25 SARS-CoV-2 serological rapid diagnostic tests using a reference panel of plasma specimens at the Uganda Virus Research Institute |
title_short | Evaluation of the performance of 25 SARS-CoV-2 serological rapid diagnostic tests using a reference panel of plasma specimens at the Uganda Virus Research Institute |
title_sort | evaluation of the performance of 25 sars-cov-2 serological rapid diagnostic tests using a reference panel of plasma specimens at the uganda virus research institute |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8442260/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34536612 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2021.09.020 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lutalotom evaluationoftheperformanceof25sarscov2serologicalrapiddiagnostictestsusingareferencepanelofplasmaspecimensattheugandavirusresearchinstitute AT nalumansiaminah evaluationoftheperformanceof25sarscov2serologicalrapiddiagnostictestsusingareferencepanelofplasmaspecimensattheugandavirusresearchinstitute AT olaradenis evaluationoftheperformanceof25sarscov2serologicalrapiddiagnostictestsusingareferencepanelofplasmaspecimensattheugandavirusresearchinstitute AT kayiwajohn evaluationoftheperformanceof25sarscov2serologicalrapiddiagnostictestsusingareferencepanelofplasmaspecimensattheugandavirusresearchinstitute AT ogwangbernard evaluationoftheperformanceof25sarscov2serologicalrapiddiagnostictestsusingareferencepanelofplasmaspecimensattheugandavirusresearchinstitute AT odwiloemmanuel evaluationoftheperformanceof25sarscov2serologicalrapiddiagnostictestsusingareferencepanelofplasmaspecimensattheugandavirusresearchinstitute AT waterachristine evaluationoftheperformanceof25sarscov2serologicalrapiddiagnostictestsusingareferencepanelofplasmaspecimensattheugandavirusresearchinstitute AT balinandistephen evaluationoftheperformanceof25sarscov2serologicalrapiddiagnostictestsusingareferencepanelofplasmaspecimensattheugandavirusresearchinstitute AT kiconcojocelyn evaluationoftheperformanceof25sarscov2serologicalrapiddiagnostictestsusingareferencepanelofplasmaspecimensattheugandavirusresearchinstitute AT nakaseegujoweria evaluationoftheperformanceof25sarscov2serologicalrapiddiagnostictestsusingareferencepanelofplasmaspecimensattheugandavirusresearchinstitute AT serwangajennifer evaluationoftheperformanceof25sarscov2serologicalrapiddiagnostictestsusingareferencepanelofplasmaspecimensattheugandavirusresearchinstitute AT kikairebernard evaluationoftheperformanceof25sarscov2serologicalrapiddiagnostictestsusingareferencepanelofplasmaspecimensattheugandavirusresearchinstitute AT ssemwangadeogratius evaluationoftheperformanceof25sarscov2serologicalrapiddiagnostictestsusingareferencepanelofplasmaspecimensattheugandavirusresearchinstitute AT abikobrendah evaluationoftheperformanceof25sarscov2serologicalrapiddiagnostictestsusingareferencepanelofplasmaspecimensattheugandavirusresearchinstitute AT nserekochristopher evaluationoftheperformanceof25sarscov2serologicalrapiddiagnostictestsusingareferencepanelofplasmaspecimensattheugandavirusresearchinstitute AT cottenmatthew evaluationoftheperformanceof25sarscov2serologicalrapiddiagnostictestsusingareferencepanelofplasmaspecimensattheugandavirusresearchinstitute AT buulejoshua evaluationoftheperformanceof25sarscov2serologicalrapiddiagnostictestsusingareferencepanelofplasmaspecimensattheugandavirusresearchinstitute AT lutwamajulius evaluationoftheperformanceof25sarscov2serologicalrapiddiagnostictestsusingareferencepanelofplasmaspecimensattheugandavirusresearchinstitute AT downingrobert evaluationoftheperformanceof25sarscov2serologicalrapiddiagnostictestsusingareferencepanelofplasmaspecimensattheugandavirusresearchinstitute AT kaleebupontiano evaluationoftheperformanceof25sarscov2serologicalrapiddiagnostictestsusingareferencepanelofplasmaspecimensattheugandavirusresearchinstitute |