Cargando…

Inter-laboratory comparison of water solubility methods applied to difficult-to-test substances

Water solubility is perhaps the single most important physical–chemical property determining the environmental fate and effects of organic compounds. Its determination is particularly challenging for compounds with extremely low solubility, frequently referred to as “difficult-to-test” substances an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Letinski, Daniel J., Redman, Aaron D., Birch, Heidi, Mayer, Philipp
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8442276/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34526066
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13065-021-00778-7
_version_ 1783752976262758400
author Letinski, Daniel J.
Redman, Aaron D.
Birch, Heidi
Mayer, Philipp
author_facet Letinski, Daniel J.
Redman, Aaron D.
Birch, Heidi
Mayer, Philipp
author_sort Letinski, Daniel J.
collection PubMed
description Water solubility is perhaps the single most important physical–chemical property determining the environmental fate and effects of organic compounds. Its determination is particularly challenging for compounds with extremely low solubility, frequently referred to as “difficult-to-test” substances and having solubility’s generally less than 0.1 mg/L. The existing regulatory water solubility test for these compounds is the column elution method. Its applicability, however, is limited, to non-volatile solid or crystalline hydrophobic organic compounds. There currently exists no test guideline for measuring the water solubility of very hydrophobic liquid, and potentially volatile, difficult-to-test compounds. This paper describes a “slow-stir” water solubility methodology along with results of a ring trial across five laboratories evaluating the method’s performance. The slow-stir method was applied to n-hexylcyclohexane, a volatile, liquid hydrophobic hydrocarbon. In order to benchmark the inter-laboratory variability associated with the proposed slow-stir method, the five laboratories separately determined the solubility of dodecahydrotriphenylene, a hydrophobic solid compound using the existing column elution guideline. Results across the participating laboratories indicated comparable reproducibility with relative standard deviations (RSD) of 20% or less reported for each test compound – solubility method pair. The inter-laboratory RSD was 16% for n-hexylcyclohexane (mean 14 µg/L, n = 5) using the slow-stir method. For dodecahydrotriphenylene, the inter-laboratory RSD was 20% (mean 2.6 µg/L, n = 4) using the existing column elution method. This study outlines approaches that should be followed and the experimental parameters that have been deemed important for an expanded ring trial of the slow-stir water solubility method. [Image: see text] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13065-021-00778-7.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8442276
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84422762021-09-15 Inter-laboratory comparison of water solubility methods applied to difficult-to-test substances Letinski, Daniel J. Redman, Aaron D. Birch, Heidi Mayer, Philipp BMC Chem Methodology Article Water solubility is perhaps the single most important physical–chemical property determining the environmental fate and effects of organic compounds. Its determination is particularly challenging for compounds with extremely low solubility, frequently referred to as “difficult-to-test” substances and having solubility’s generally less than 0.1 mg/L. The existing regulatory water solubility test for these compounds is the column elution method. Its applicability, however, is limited, to non-volatile solid or crystalline hydrophobic organic compounds. There currently exists no test guideline for measuring the water solubility of very hydrophobic liquid, and potentially volatile, difficult-to-test compounds. This paper describes a “slow-stir” water solubility methodology along with results of a ring trial across five laboratories evaluating the method’s performance. The slow-stir method was applied to n-hexylcyclohexane, a volatile, liquid hydrophobic hydrocarbon. In order to benchmark the inter-laboratory variability associated with the proposed slow-stir method, the five laboratories separately determined the solubility of dodecahydrotriphenylene, a hydrophobic solid compound using the existing column elution guideline. Results across the participating laboratories indicated comparable reproducibility with relative standard deviations (RSD) of 20% or less reported for each test compound – solubility method pair. The inter-laboratory RSD was 16% for n-hexylcyclohexane (mean 14 µg/L, n = 5) using the slow-stir method. For dodecahydrotriphenylene, the inter-laboratory RSD was 20% (mean 2.6 µg/L, n = 4) using the existing column elution method. This study outlines approaches that should be followed and the experimental parameters that have been deemed important for an expanded ring trial of the slow-stir water solubility method. [Image: see text] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13065-021-00778-7. Springer International Publishing 2021-09-15 /pmc/articles/PMC8442276/ /pubmed/34526066 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13065-021-00778-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Methodology Article
Letinski, Daniel J.
Redman, Aaron D.
Birch, Heidi
Mayer, Philipp
Inter-laboratory comparison of water solubility methods applied to difficult-to-test substances
title Inter-laboratory comparison of water solubility methods applied to difficult-to-test substances
title_full Inter-laboratory comparison of water solubility methods applied to difficult-to-test substances
title_fullStr Inter-laboratory comparison of water solubility methods applied to difficult-to-test substances
title_full_unstemmed Inter-laboratory comparison of water solubility methods applied to difficult-to-test substances
title_short Inter-laboratory comparison of water solubility methods applied to difficult-to-test substances
title_sort inter-laboratory comparison of water solubility methods applied to difficult-to-test substances
topic Methodology Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8442276/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34526066
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13065-021-00778-7
work_keys_str_mv AT letinskidanielj interlaboratorycomparisonofwatersolubilitymethodsappliedtodifficulttotestsubstances
AT redmanaarond interlaboratorycomparisonofwatersolubilitymethodsappliedtodifficulttotestsubstances
AT birchheidi interlaboratorycomparisonofwatersolubilitymethodsappliedtodifficulttotestsubstances
AT mayerphilipp interlaboratorycomparisonofwatersolubilitymethodsappliedtodifficulttotestsubstances