Cargando…

Oral care practices in stroke: findings from the UK and Australia

AIMS: To examine current practice, perceptions of healthcare professionals and factors affecting provision for oral care post-stroke in the UK and Australia. BACKGROUND: Poor oral care has negative health consequences for people post-stroke. Little is known about oral care practice in hospital for p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bangee, Munirah, Martinez-Garduno, Cintia Mayel, Brady, Marian C., Cadilhac, Dominique A., Dale, Simeon, Hurley, Margaret A., McInnes, Elizabeth, Middleton, Sandy, Patel, Tahera, Watkins, Caroline L., Lightbody, Elizabeth
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8442320/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34526030
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12912-021-00642-y
_version_ 1783752985764954112
author Bangee, Munirah
Martinez-Garduno, Cintia Mayel
Brady, Marian C.
Cadilhac, Dominique A.
Dale, Simeon
Hurley, Margaret A.
McInnes, Elizabeth
Middleton, Sandy
Patel, Tahera
Watkins, Caroline L.
Lightbody, Elizabeth
author_facet Bangee, Munirah
Martinez-Garduno, Cintia Mayel
Brady, Marian C.
Cadilhac, Dominique A.
Dale, Simeon
Hurley, Margaret A.
McInnes, Elizabeth
Middleton, Sandy
Patel, Tahera
Watkins, Caroline L.
Lightbody, Elizabeth
author_sort Bangee, Munirah
collection PubMed
description AIMS: To examine current practice, perceptions of healthcare professionals and factors affecting provision for oral care post-stroke in the UK and Australia. BACKGROUND: Poor oral care has negative health consequences for people post-stroke. Little is known about oral care practice in hospital for people post-stroke and factors affecting provision in different countries. DESIGN: A cross-sectional survey. METHODS: Questionnaires were mailed to stroke specialist nurses in UK and Australian hospitals providing inpatient acute or rehabilitation care post-stroke. The survey was conducted between April and November 2019. Non-respondents were contacted up to five times. RESULTS: Completed questionnaires were received from 150/174 (86%) hospitals in the UK, and 120/162 (74%) in Australia. A total of 52% of UK hospitals and 30% of Australian hospitals reported having a general oral care protocol, with 53% of UK and only 13% of Australian hospitals reporting using oral care assessment tools. Of those using oral care assessment tools, 50% of UK and 38% of Australian hospitals used local hospital-specific tools. Oral care assessments were undertaken on admission in 73% of UK and 57% of Australian hospitals. Staff had received oral care training in the last year in 55% of UK and 30% of Australian hospitals. Inadequate training and education on oral care for pre-registration nurses were reported by 63% of UK and 53% of Australian respondents. CONCLUSION: Unacceptable variability exists in oral care practices in hospital stroke care settings. Oral care could be improved by increasing training, performing individual assessments on admission, and using standardised assessment tools and protocols to guide high quality care. The study highlights the need for incorporating staff training and the use of oral care standardised assessments and protocols in stroke care in order to improve patient outcomes. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12912-021-00642-y.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8442320
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84423202021-09-15 Oral care practices in stroke: findings from the UK and Australia Bangee, Munirah Martinez-Garduno, Cintia Mayel Brady, Marian C. Cadilhac, Dominique A. Dale, Simeon Hurley, Margaret A. McInnes, Elizabeth Middleton, Sandy Patel, Tahera Watkins, Caroline L. Lightbody, Elizabeth BMC Nurs Research AIMS: To examine current practice, perceptions of healthcare professionals and factors affecting provision for oral care post-stroke in the UK and Australia. BACKGROUND: Poor oral care has negative health consequences for people post-stroke. Little is known about oral care practice in hospital for people post-stroke and factors affecting provision in different countries. DESIGN: A cross-sectional survey. METHODS: Questionnaires were mailed to stroke specialist nurses in UK and Australian hospitals providing inpatient acute or rehabilitation care post-stroke. The survey was conducted between April and November 2019. Non-respondents were contacted up to five times. RESULTS: Completed questionnaires were received from 150/174 (86%) hospitals in the UK, and 120/162 (74%) in Australia. A total of 52% of UK hospitals and 30% of Australian hospitals reported having a general oral care protocol, with 53% of UK and only 13% of Australian hospitals reporting using oral care assessment tools. Of those using oral care assessment tools, 50% of UK and 38% of Australian hospitals used local hospital-specific tools. Oral care assessments were undertaken on admission in 73% of UK and 57% of Australian hospitals. Staff had received oral care training in the last year in 55% of UK and 30% of Australian hospitals. Inadequate training and education on oral care for pre-registration nurses were reported by 63% of UK and 53% of Australian respondents. CONCLUSION: Unacceptable variability exists in oral care practices in hospital stroke care settings. Oral care could be improved by increasing training, performing individual assessments on admission, and using standardised assessment tools and protocols to guide high quality care. The study highlights the need for incorporating staff training and the use of oral care standardised assessments and protocols in stroke care in order to improve patient outcomes. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12912-021-00642-y. BioMed Central 2021-09-15 /pmc/articles/PMC8442320/ /pubmed/34526030 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12912-021-00642-y Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Bangee, Munirah
Martinez-Garduno, Cintia Mayel
Brady, Marian C.
Cadilhac, Dominique A.
Dale, Simeon
Hurley, Margaret A.
McInnes, Elizabeth
Middleton, Sandy
Patel, Tahera
Watkins, Caroline L.
Lightbody, Elizabeth
Oral care practices in stroke: findings from the UK and Australia
title Oral care practices in stroke: findings from the UK and Australia
title_full Oral care practices in stroke: findings from the UK and Australia
title_fullStr Oral care practices in stroke: findings from the UK and Australia
title_full_unstemmed Oral care practices in stroke: findings from the UK and Australia
title_short Oral care practices in stroke: findings from the UK and Australia
title_sort oral care practices in stroke: findings from the uk and australia
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8442320/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34526030
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12912-021-00642-y
work_keys_str_mv AT bangeemunirah oralcarepracticesinstrokefindingsfromtheukandaustralia
AT martinezgardunocintiamayel oralcarepracticesinstrokefindingsfromtheukandaustralia
AT bradymarianc oralcarepracticesinstrokefindingsfromtheukandaustralia
AT cadilhacdominiquea oralcarepracticesinstrokefindingsfromtheukandaustralia
AT dalesimeon oralcarepracticesinstrokefindingsfromtheukandaustralia
AT hurleymargareta oralcarepracticesinstrokefindingsfromtheukandaustralia
AT mcinneselizabeth oralcarepracticesinstrokefindingsfromtheukandaustralia
AT middletonsandy oralcarepracticesinstrokefindingsfromtheukandaustralia
AT pateltahera oralcarepracticesinstrokefindingsfromtheukandaustralia
AT watkinscarolinel oralcarepracticesinstrokefindingsfromtheukandaustralia
AT lightbodyelizabeth oralcarepracticesinstrokefindingsfromtheukandaustralia