Cargando…

Daily weekday audit and feedback to clinicians for an inpatient intervention in obstetrics: is there sustained impact over the weekend? A secondary analysis of a prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND: Audit and feedback as an implementation strategy leads to small, but potentially important improvements in practice. Yet, audit and feedback is time and personnel intensive. Many interventions designed for inpatient care are meant to be utilized by care teams all days of the week, includ...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hamm, Rebecca F., Levine, Lisa D., Lane-Fall, Meghan, Beidas, Rinad
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8442329/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34526139
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s43058-021-00210-0
_version_ 1783752987342012416
author Hamm, Rebecca F.
Levine, Lisa D.
Lane-Fall, Meghan
Beidas, Rinad
author_facet Hamm, Rebecca F.
Levine, Lisa D.
Lane-Fall, Meghan
Beidas, Rinad
author_sort Hamm, Rebecca F.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Audit and feedback as an implementation strategy leads to small, but potentially important improvements in practice. Yet, audit and feedback is time and personnel intensive. Many interventions designed for inpatient care are meant to be utilized by care teams all days of the week, including weekends when research staff are at a minimum. We aimed to determine if audit and feedback regarding use of an evidence-based inpatient obstetric intervention performed only on weekdays could have a sustained impact over the weekend. METHODS: This study was performed as a secondary analysis of a prospective cohort study examining the impact of implementation of a validated calculator that predicts the likelihood of cesarean delivery during labor induction. During the 1 year postimplementation period, Monday through Friday, a member of the study team contacted clinicians daily to provide verbal feedback. While the same clinician pool worked weekend shifts, audit and feedback did not occur on Saturdays or Sundays. The primary outcome was intervention use, defined as documentation of counseling around the cesarean risk calculator result, in the electronic health record. Intervention use was compared between those with (weekdays) and without (weekends) audit and feedback. RESULTS: Of the 822 women meeting eligibility criteria during the postimplementation period (July 1, 2018–June 30, 2019), 651 (79.2%) were admitted on weekdays when audit and feedback was occurring and 171 (20.8%) on weekends without audit and feedback. The use of the cesarean risk calculator was recorded in 676 of 822 (82.2%) of eligible patient charts. There was no significant difference in cesarean risk calculator use overall by days when audit and feedback occurred versus days without audit and feedback (weekday admissions 82.0% vs. weekend admissions 83.0%, aOR 0.90 95% CI [0.57–1.40], p = 0.76). There was no significant trend in the relationship between calculator use and weekday versus weekend admission by month across the study period (p = 0.21). CONCLUSIONS: Daily weekday audit and feedback for implementation of an evidence-based inpatient obstetric intervention had sustained impact over the weekends. This finding may have implications for both research staffing, as well as sustainability efforts. Further research should determine the lowest effective frequency of audit and feedback to produce implementation success.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8442329
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84423292021-09-15 Daily weekday audit and feedback to clinicians for an inpatient intervention in obstetrics: is there sustained impact over the weekend? A secondary analysis of a prospective cohort study Hamm, Rebecca F. Levine, Lisa D. Lane-Fall, Meghan Beidas, Rinad Implement Sci Commun Short Report BACKGROUND: Audit and feedback as an implementation strategy leads to small, but potentially important improvements in practice. Yet, audit and feedback is time and personnel intensive. Many interventions designed for inpatient care are meant to be utilized by care teams all days of the week, including weekends when research staff are at a minimum. We aimed to determine if audit and feedback regarding use of an evidence-based inpatient obstetric intervention performed only on weekdays could have a sustained impact over the weekend. METHODS: This study was performed as a secondary analysis of a prospective cohort study examining the impact of implementation of a validated calculator that predicts the likelihood of cesarean delivery during labor induction. During the 1 year postimplementation period, Monday through Friday, a member of the study team contacted clinicians daily to provide verbal feedback. While the same clinician pool worked weekend shifts, audit and feedback did not occur on Saturdays or Sundays. The primary outcome was intervention use, defined as documentation of counseling around the cesarean risk calculator result, in the electronic health record. Intervention use was compared between those with (weekdays) and without (weekends) audit and feedback. RESULTS: Of the 822 women meeting eligibility criteria during the postimplementation period (July 1, 2018–June 30, 2019), 651 (79.2%) were admitted on weekdays when audit and feedback was occurring and 171 (20.8%) on weekends without audit and feedback. The use of the cesarean risk calculator was recorded in 676 of 822 (82.2%) of eligible patient charts. There was no significant difference in cesarean risk calculator use overall by days when audit and feedback occurred versus days without audit and feedback (weekday admissions 82.0% vs. weekend admissions 83.0%, aOR 0.90 95% CI [0.57–1.40], p = 0.76). There was no significant trend in the relationship between calculator use and weekday versus weekend admission by month across the study period (p = 0.21). CONCLUSIONS: Daily weekday audit and feedback for implementation of an evidence-based inpatient obstetric intervention had sustained impact over the weekends. This finding may have implications for both research staffing, as well as sustainability efforts. Further research should determine the lowest effective frequency of audit and feedback to produce implementation success. BioMed Central 2021-09-15 /pmc/articles/PMC8442329/ /pubmed/34526139 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s43058-021-00210-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Short Report
Hamm, Rebecca F.
Levine, Lisa D.
Lane-Fall, Meghan
Beidas, Rinad
Daily weekday audit and feedback to clinicians for an inpatient intervention in obstetrics: is there sustained impact over the weekend? A secondary analysis of a prospective cohort study
title Daily weekday audit and feedback to clinicians for an inpatient intervention in obstetrics: is there sustained impact over the weekend? A secondary analysis of a prospective cohort study
title_full Daily weekday audit and feedback to clinicians for an inpatient intervention in obstetrics: is there sustained impact over the weekend? A secondary analysis of a prospective cohort study
title_fullStr Daily weekday audit and feedback to clinicians for an inpatient intervention in obstetrics: is there sustained impact over the weekend? A secondary analysis of a prospective cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Daily weekday audit and feedback to clinicians for an inpatient intervention in obstetrics: is there sustained impact over the weekend? A secondary analysis of a prospective cohort study
title_short Daily weekday audit and feedback to clinicians for an inpatient intervention in obstetrics: is there sustained impact over the weekend? A secondary analysis of a prospective cohort study
title_sort daily weekday audit and feedback to clinicians for an inpatient intervention in obstetrics: is there sustained impact over the weekend? a secondary analysis of a prospective cohort study
topic Short Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8442329/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34526139
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s43058-021-00210-0
work_keys_str_mv AT hammrebeccaf dailyweekdayauditandfeedbacktocliniciansforaninpatientinterventioninobstetricsistheresustainedimpactovertheweekendasecondaryanalysisofaprospectivecohortstudy
AT levinelisad dailyweekdayauditandfeedbacktocliniciansforaninpatientinterventioninobstetricsistheresustainedimpactovertheweekendasecondaryanalysisofaprospectivecohortstudy
AT lanefallmeghan dailyweekdayauditandfeedbacktocliniciansforaninpatientinterventioninobstetricsistheresustainedimpactovertheweekendasecondaryanalysisofaprospectivecohortstudy
AT beidasrinad dailyweekdayauditandfeedbacktocliniciansforaninpatientinterventioninobstetricsistheresustainedimpactovertheweekendasecondaryanalysisofaprospectivecohortstudy