Cargando…

A comparison of PCR and ELISA methods to detect different stages of Plasmodium vivax in Anopheles arabiensis

BACKGROUND: In characterizing malaria epidemiology, measuring mosquito infectiousness informs the entomological inoculation rate, an important metric of malaria transmission. PCR-based methods have been touted as more sensitive than the current “gold-standard” circumsporozoite (CSP) ELISA. Wider app...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hendershot, Allison L., Esayas, Endashaw, Sutcliffe, Alice C., Irish, Seth R., Gadisa, Endalamaw, Tadesse, Fitsum G., Lobo, Neil F.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8442364/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34526109
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13071-021-04976-z
_version_ 1783752993880932352
author Hendershot, Allison L.
Esayas, Endashaw
Sutcliffe, Alice C.
Irish, Seth R.
Gadisa, Endalamaw
Tadesse, Fitsum G.
Lobo, Neil F.
author_facet Hendershot, Allison L.
Esayas, Endashaw
Sutcliffe, Alice C.
Irish, Seth R.
Gadisa, Endalamaw
Tadesse, Fitsum G.
Lobo, Neil F.
author_sort Hendershot, Allison L.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In characterizing malaria epidemiology, measuring mosquito infectiousness informs the entomological inoculation rate, an important metric of malaria transmission. PCR-based methods have been touted as more sensitive than the current “gold-standard” circumsporozoite (CSP) ELISA. Wider application of PCR-based methods has been limited by lack of specificity for the infectious sporozoite stage. We compared a PCR method for detecting the parasite’s mitochondrial (mt) cytochrome oxidase I (COX-I) gene with ELISA for detecting circumsporozoite protein for identification of different life stages of the parasite during development within a mosquito. METHODS: A PCR-based method targeting the Plasmodium mt COX-I gene was compared with the CSP ELISA method to assess infectivity in Anopheles arabiensis colony mosquitoes fed on blood from patients infected with Plasmodium vivax. Mosquitoes were tested at six post-infection time points (days 0.5, 1, 6, 9, 12, 15). The head and thorax and the abdomen for each specimen were tested separately with each method. Agreement between methods at each infection stage was measured using Cohen’s kappa measure of test association. RESULTS: Infection status of mosquitoes was assessed in approximately 90 head/thorax and 90 abdomen segments at each time point; in total, 538 head/thorax and 534 abdomen segments were tested. In mosquitoes bisected after 0.5, 1, and 6 days post-infection (dpi), the mt COX-I PCR detected Plasmodium DNA in both the abdomen (88, 78, and 67%, respectively) and head/thorax segments (69, 60, and 44%, respectively), whilst CSP ELISA detected sporozoites in only one abdomen on day 6 post-infection. PCR was also more sensitive than ELISA for detection of Plasmodium in mosquitoes bisected after 9, 12, and 15 dpi in both the head and thorax and abdomen. There was fair agreement between methods for time points 9–15 dpi (κ = 0.312, 95% CI: 0.230–0.394). CONCLUSIONS: The mt COX-I PCR is a highly sensitive, robust method for detecting Plasmodium DNA in mosquitoes, but its limited Plasmodium life-stage specificity cannot be overcome by bisection of the head and thorax from the abdomen prior to PCR. Thus, the mt COX-I PCR is a poor candidate for identifying infectious mosquitoes. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text]
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8442364
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84423642021-09-15 A comparison of PCR and ELISA methods to detect different stages of Plasmodium vivax in Anopheles arabiensis Hendershot, Allison L. Esayas, Endashaw Sutcliffe, Alice C. Irish, Seth R. Gadisa, Endalamaw Tadesse, Fitsum G. Lobo, Neil F. Parasit Vectors Research BACKGROUND: In characterizing malaria epidemiology, measuring mosquito infectiousness informs the entomological inoculation rate, an important metric of malaria transmission. PCR-based methods have been touted as more sensitive than the current “gold-standard” circumsporozoite (CSP) ELISA. Wider application of PCR-based methods has been limited by lack of specificity for the infectious sporozoite stage. We compared a PCR method for detecting the parasite’s mitochondrial (mt) cytochrome oxidase I (COX-I) gene with ELISA for detecting circumsporozoite protein for identification of different life stages of the parasite during development within a mosquito. METHODS: A PCR-based method targeting the Plasmodium mt COX-I gene was compared with the CSP ELISA method to assess infectivity in Anopheles arabiensis colony mosquitoes fed on blood from patients infected with Plasmodium vivax. Mosquitoes were tested at six post-infection time points (days 0.5, 1, 6, 9, 12, 15). The head and thorax and the abdomen for each specimen were tested separately with each method. Agreement between methods at each infection stage was measured using Cohen’s kappa measure of test association. RESULTS: Infection status of mosquitoes was assessed in approximately 90 head/thorax and 90 abdomen segments at each time point; in total, 538 head/thorax and 534 abdomen segments were tested. In mosquitoes bisected after 0.5, 1, and 6 days post-infection (dpi), the mt COX-I PCR detected Plasmodium DNA in both the abdomen (88, 78, and 67%, respectively) and head/thorax segments (69, 60, and 44%, respectively), whilst CSP ELISA detected sporozoites in only one abdomen on day 6 post-infection. PCR was also more sensitive than ELISA for detection of Plasmodium in mosquitoes bisected after 9, 12, and 15 dpi in both the head and thorax and abdomen. There was fair agreement between methods for time points 9–15 dpi (κ = 0.312, 95% CI: 0.230–0.394). CONCLUSIONS: The mt COX-I PCR is a highly sensitive, robust method for detecting Plasmodium DNA in mosquitoes, but its limited Plasmodium life-stage specificity cannot be overcome by bisection of the head and thorax from the abdomen prior to PCR. Thus, the mt COX-I PCR is a poor candidate for identifying infectious mosquitoes. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text] BioMed Central 2021-09-15 /pmc/articles/PMC8442364/ /pubmed/34526109 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13071-021-04976-z Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Hendershot, Allison L.
Esayas, Endashaw
Sutcliffe, Alice C.
Irish, Seth R.
Gadisa, Endalamaw
Tadesse, Fitsum G.
Lobo, Neil F.
A comparison of PCR and ELISA methods to detect different stages of Plasmodium vivax in Anopheles arabiensis
title A comparison of PCR and ELISA methods to detect different stages of Plasmodium vivax in Anopheles arabiensis
title_full A comparison of PCR and ELISA methods to detect different stages of Plasmodium vivax in Anopheles arabiensis
title_fullStr A comparison of PCR and ELISA methods to detect different stages of Plasmodium vivax in Anopheles arabiensis
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of PCR and ELISA methods to detect different stages of Plasmodium vivax in Anopheles arabiensis
title_short A comparison of PCR and ELISA methods to detect different stages of Plasmodium vivax in Anopheles arabiensis
title_sort comparison of pcr and elisa methods to detect different stages of plasmodium vivax in anopheles arabiensis
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8442364/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34526109
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13071-021-04976-z
work_keys_str_mv AT hendershotallisonl acomparisonofpcrandelisamethodstodetectdifferentstagesofplasmodiumvivaxinanophelesarabiensis
AT esayasendashaw acomparisonofpcrandelisamethodstodetectdifferentstagesofplasmodiumvivaxinanophelesarabiensis
AT sutcliffealicec acomparisonofpcrandelisamethodstodetectdifferentstagesofplasmodiumvivaxinanophelesarabiensis
AT irishsethr acomparisonofpcrandelisamethodstodetectdifferentstagesofplasmodiumvivaxinanophelesarabiensis
AT gadisaendalamaw acomparisonofpcrandelisamethodstodetectdifferentstagesofplasmodiumvivaxinanophelesarabiensis
AT tadessefitsumg acomparisonofpcrandelisamethodstodetectdifferentstagesofplasmodiumvivaxinanophelesarabiensis
AT loboneilf acomparisonofpcrandelisamethodstodetectdifferentstagesofplasmodiumvivaxinanophelesarabiensis
AT hendershotallisonl comparisonofpcrandelisamethodstodetectdifferentstagesofplasmodiumvivaxinanophelesarabiensis
AT esayasendashaw comparisonofpcrandelisamethodstodetectdifferentstagesofplasmodiumvivaxinanophelesarabiensis
AT sutcliffealicec comparisonofpcrandelisamethodstodetectdifferentstagesofplasmodiumvivaxinanophelesarabiensis
AT irishsethr comparisonofpcrandelisamethodstodetectdifferentstagesofplasmodiumvivaxinanophelesarabiensis
AT gadisaendalamaw comparisonofpcrandelisamethodstodetectdifferentstagesofplasmodiumvivaxinanophelesarabiensis
AT tadessefitsumg comparisonofpcrandelisamethodstodetectdifferentstagesofplasmodiumvivaxinanophelesarabiensis
AT loboneilf comparisonofpcrandelisamethodstodetectdifferentstagesofplasmodiumvivaxinanophelesarabiensis