Cargando…

Normalising comparative effectiveness trials as clinical practice

There is a lack of high-quality evidence underpinning many contemporary clinical practice guidelines embedded in the healthcare systems, leading to treatment uncertainty and practice variation in most medical disciplines. Comparative effectiveness trials (CETs) represent a diverse range of research...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Briffa, Tom, Symons, Tanya, Zeps, Nikolajs, Straiton, Nicola, Tarnow-Mordi, William Odita, Simes, John, Harris, Ian A., Cruz, Melinda, Webb, Steven A., Litton, Edward, Nichol, Alistair, Williams, Christopher M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8442385/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34526083
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-021-05566-1
_version_ 1783752997872861184
author Briffa, Tom
Symons, Tanya
Zeps, Nikolajs
Straiton, Nicola
Tarnow-Mordi, William Odita
Simes, John
Harris, Ian A.
Cruz, Melinda
Webb, Steven A.
Litton, Edward
Nichol, Alistair
Williams, Christopher M.
author_facet Briffa, Tom
Symons, Tanya
Zeps, Nikolajs
Straiton, Nicola
Tarnow-Mordi, William Odita
Simes, John
Harris, Ian A.
Cruz, Melinda
Webb, Steven A.
Litton, Edward
Nichol, Alistair
Williams, Christopher M.
author_sort Briffa, Tom
collection PubMed
description There is a lack of high-quality evidence underpinning many contemporary clinical practice guidelines embedded in the healthcare systems, leading to treatment uncertainty and practice variation in most medical disciplines. Comparative effectiveness trials (CETs) represent a diverse range of research that focuses on optimising health outcomes by comparing currently approved interventions to generate high-quality evidence to inform decision makers. Yet, despite their ability to produce real-world evidence that addresses the key priorities of patients and health systems, many implementation challenges exist within the healthcare environment. This manuscript aims to highlight common barriers to conducting CETs and describes potential solutions to normalise their conduct as part of a learning healthcare system.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8442385
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84423852021-09-15 Normalising comparative effectiveness trials as clinical practice Briffa, Tom Symons, Tanya Zeps, Nikolajs Straiton, Nicola Tarnow-Mordi, William Odita Simes, John Harris, Ian A. Cruz, Melinda Webb, Steven A. Litton, Edward Nichol, Alistair Williams, Christopher M. Trials Commentary There is a lack of high-quality evidence underpinning many contemporary clinical practice guidelines embedded in the healthcare systems, leading to treatment uncertainty and practice variation in most medical disciplines. Comparative effectiveness trials (CETs) represent a diverse range of research that focuses on optimising health outcomes by comparing currently approved interventions to generate high-quality evidence to inform decision makers. Yet, despite their ability to produce real-world evidence that addresses the key priorities of patients and health systems, many implementation challenges exist within the healthcare environment. This manuscript aims to highlight common barriers to conducting CETs and describes potential solutions to normalise their conduct as part of a learning healthcare system. BioMed Central 2021-09-15 /pmc/articles/PMC8442385/ /pubmed/34526083 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-021-05566-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Commentary
Briffa, Tom
Symons, Tanya
Zeps, Nikolajs
Straiton, Nicola
Tarnow-Mordi, William Odita
Simes, John
Harris, Ian A.
Cruz, Melinda
Webb, Steven A.
Litton, Edward
Nichol, Alistair
Williams, Christopher M.
Normalising comparative effectiveness trials as clinical practice
title Normalising comparative effectiveness trials as clinical practice
title_full Normalising comparative effectiveness trials as clinical practice
title_fullStr Normalising comparative effectiveness trials as clinical practice
title_full_unstemmed Normalising comparative effectiveness trials as clinical practice
title_short Normalising comparative effectiveness trials as clinical practice
title_sort normalising comparative effectiveness trials as clinical practice
topic Commentary
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8442385/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34526083
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-021-05566-1
work_keys_str_mv AT briffatom normalisingcomparativeeffectivenesstrialsasclinicalpractice
AT symonstanya normalisingcomparativeeffectivenesstrialsasclinicalpractice
AT zepsnikolajs normalisingcomparativeeffectivenesstrialsasclinicalpractice
AT straitonnicola normalisingcomparativeeffectivenesstrialsasclinicalpractice
AT tarnowmordiwilliamodita normalisingcomparativeeffectivenesstrialsasclinicalpractice
AT simesjohn normalisingcomparativeeffectivenesstrialsasclinicalpractice
AT harrisiana normalisingcomparativeeffectivenesstrialsasclinicalpractice
AT cruzmelinda normalisingcomparativeeffectivenesstrialsasclinicalpractice
AT webbstevena normalisingcomparativeeffectivenesstrialsasclinicalpractice
AT littonedward normalisingcomparativeeffectivenesstrialsasclinicalpractice
AT nicholalistair normalisingcomparativeeffectivenesstrialsasclinicalpractice
AT williamschristopherm normalisingcomparativeeffectivenesstrialsasclinicalpractice