Cargando…

Inconsistent seduction: Addressing confounds and methodological issues in the study of the seductive detail effect

INTRODUCTION: The inclusion of interesting but irrelevant details in instructional materials may interfere with recall and application of the core content. Although this seductive detail effect is well researched, recent research highlights factors that may influence the effect size. OBJECTIVES: The...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tislar, Kay L., Steelman, Kelly S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8442593/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34423570
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/brb3.2322
_version_ 1783753037225918464
author Tislar, Kay L.
Steelman, Kelly S.
author_facet Tislar, Kay L.
Steelman, Kelly S.
author_sort Tislar, Kay L.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The inclusion of interesting but irrelevant details in instructional materials may interfere with recall and application of the core content. Although this seductive detail effect is well researched, recent research highlights factors that may influence the effect size. OBJECTIVES: The current study discusses confounds and methodological issues in the study of seductive details and outlines strategies for overcoming them. These practices were then applied in a study that examined the role of learning objectives on the seductive detail effect. METHODS: Seductive details were selected on the basis of interest and importance level and matched for word count and reading level. The 3 × 2 between‐subjects design presented 132 undergraduate students with a lesson on plate tectonics; participants completed tests on both recall and transfer. RESULTS: Results did not reveal a consistent detrimental effect of high‐interest details on core content recall and transfer. On the recall test, contrary to expectation, the seductive detail effect obtained only when objectives were provided. A similar pattern emerged on the transfer task. CONCLUSION: These findings highlight the difficulty of consistently eliciting the seductive detail effect. We discuss outstanding issues that must be addressed in order to develop practical guidelines on the inclusion of seductive details in educational materials.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8442593
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84425932021-09-15 Inconsistent seduction: Addressing confounds and methodological issues in the study of the seductive detail effect Tislar, Kay L. Steelman, Kelly S. Brain Behav Original Research INTRODUCTION: The inclusion of interesting but irrelevant details in instructional materials may interfere with recall and application of the core content. Although this seductive detail effect is well researched, recent research highlights factors that may influence the effect size. OBJECTIVES: The current study discusses confounds and methodological issues in the study of seductive details and outlines strategies for overcoming them. These practices were then applied in a study that examined the role of learning objectives on the seductive detail effect. METHODS: Seductive details were selected on the basis of interest and importance level and matched for word count and reading level. The 3 × 2 between‐subjects design presented 132 undergraduate students with a lesson on plate tectonics; participants completed tests on both recall and transfer. RESULTS: Results did not reveal a consistent detrimental effect of high‐interest details on core content recall and transfer. On the recall test, contrary to expectation, the seductive detail effect obtained only when objectives were provided. A similar pattern emerged on the transfer task. CONCLUSION: These findings highlight the difficulty of consistently eliciting the seductive detail effect. We discuss outstanding issues that must be addressed in order to develop practical guidelines on the inclusion of seductive details in educational materials. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-08-22 /pmc/articles/PMC8442593/ /pubmed/34423570 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/brb3.2322 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Brain and Behavior published by Wiley Periodicals LLC https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Tislar, Kay L.
Steelman, Kelly S.
Inconsistent seduction: Addressing confounds and methodological issues in the study of the seductive detail effect
title Inconsistent seduction: Addressing confounds and methodological issues in the study of the seductive detail effect
title_full Inconsistent seduction: Addressing confounds and methodological issues in the study of the seductive detail effect
title_fullStr Inconsistent seduction: Addressing confounds and methodological issues in the study of the seductive detail effect
title_full_unstemmed Inconsistent seduction: Addressing confounds and methodological issues in the study of the seductive detail effect
title_short Inconsistent seduction: Addressing confounds and methodological issues in the study of the seductive detail effect
title_sort inconsistent seduction: addressing confounds and methodological issues in the study of the seductive detail effect
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8442593/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34423570
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/brb3.2322
work_keys_str_mv AT tislarkayl inconsistentseductionaddressingconfoundsandmethodologicalissuesinthestudyoftheseductivedetaileffect
AT steelmankellys inconsistentseductionaddressingconfoundsandmethodologicalissuesinthestudyoftheseductivedetaileffect