Cargando…
More than half of systematic reviews have relevant core outcome sets
OBJECTIVES: Using recent systematic reviews (SRs), our objectives were to: (1) develop a framework to assess whether a given COS is relevant to the scope of a SR; (2) examine the proportion of SRs for which relevant COS exist; and (3) for SRs for which COS exist, examine the extent to which outcomes...
Autores principales: | Saldanha, Ian J., Dodd, Susanna, Gorst, Sarah L., Williamson, Paula R. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8442852/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33974970 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.04.019 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Representation of published core outcome sets for research in regulatory guidance: protocol
por: Dodd, Susanna, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Assessing the relevance and uptake of core outcome sets (an agreed minimum collection of outcomes to measure in research studies) in Cochrane systematic reviews: a review
por: Williamson, Paula R, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Comparison of published core outcome sets with outcomes recommended in regulatory guidance from the US Food and Drug Administration and European Medicines Agency: cross sectional analysis
por: Saldanha, Ian J, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Choosing important health outcomes for comparative effectiveness research: 5th annual update to a systematic review of core outcome sets for research
por: Gargon, Elizabeth, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Development of core outcome sets for both research and care
por: Kearney, Anna, et al.
Publicado: (2023)