Cargando…

INTERPOSITION-ARTHROPLASTY OF THE ELBOW: SYSTEMATIC REVIEW

OBJECTIVE: To perform a systematic review of the main methods and indications of interposition arthroplasty in the rigid elbow. METHODS: The research was carried out by three independent researchers, in the databases PubMed, Medline and Embase, according to the descriptors selected as a research str...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: ALMEIDA, THIAGO BERNARDO CARVALHO DE, REIS, EDMILSON DA SILVA, PASCARELLI, LUCIANO, BONGIOVANNI, ROBERTO RANGEL, TEODORO, RENATO LOUREIRO
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: ATHA EDITORA 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8443008/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34566482
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1413-785220212904238960
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: To perform a systematic review of the main methods and indications of interposition arthroplasty in the rigid elbow. METHODS: The research was carried out by three independent researchers, in the databases PubMed, Medline and Embase, according to the descriptors selected as a research strategy and filters selected in the inclusion criteria. RESULTS: In total, 21 studies were found with the afore mentioned descriptors and which were considered adequate according to the design and relevance according to the type of study and inclusion filters. There was a very strong correlation between the searches of the three researchers (k = 0.809). At the end, 14 complete studies were presented, all of which were included. CONCLUSION: The main finding of this study was to note that there is an evident lack of research with a high level of real effectiveness and indication for interposition arthroplasty in the rigid elbow. Most studies point to positive results when the patient is young and a total arthroplasty is not indicated. No meta-analysis or randomized clinical trial was found for this specific topic, despite being a technique applied in clinical practice for some decades and showing good results. Level of Evidence V, Systematic Review.