Cargando…
Comparison of Canal Transportation, Separation Rate, and Preparation Time between One Shape and Neoniti (Neolix): An In Vitro CBCT Study
PURPOSE: This in vitro study compared root canal preparation in curved mesiobuccal canals of molar teeth using either the One Shape™ or the Neoniti (Neolix) rotary NiTi single-file systems, assessing canal transportation, instrument separation and time required for preparation. Methods. Extracted ma...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8443393/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34539788 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/6457071 |
_version_ | 1783753178400948224 |
---|---|
author | Kuzekanani, Maryam Sadeghi, Faranak Hatami, Nima Rad, Maryam Darijani, Mansoureh Walsh, Laurence James |
author_facet | Kuzekanani, Maryam Sadeghi, Faranak Hatami, Nima Rad, Maryam Darijani, Mansoureh Walsh, Laurence James |
author_sort | Kuzekanani, Maryam |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: This in vitro study compared root canal preparation in curved mesiobuccal canals of molar teeth using either the One Shape™ or the Neoniti (Neolix) rotary NiTi single-file systems, assessing canal transportation, instrument separation and time required for preparation. Methods. Extracted maxillary and mandibular human molar teeth with mesiobuccal canals having apical angles of curvature between 25 and 35(o) were selected and embedded in acrylic resin blocks, and an initial CBCT was taken. The teeth were divided into two equal groups (n = 20), and the canals were cleaned and shaped using either Neoniti™ or One Shape™ engine-driven NiTi rotary files. Each individual instrument was used to prepare 5 canals. The time required for the preparation of each canal was recorded. Postpreparation CBCT scans were taken and used to determine the extent of canal transportation at levels of 2, 4, 6, and 8 mm from the apex. The Kolmogorov–Smirnov test for normality was applied, and then, datasets were compared using independent t-tests, with a threshold of P < 0.05. RESULTS: Neoniti rotary files caused significantly less canal transportation of the curved canals (P=0.0001). On the other hand, the time required for canal preparation was significantly shorter for One Shape (P=0.0001). No instrument separation was recorded in both groups. CONCLUSION: Based on these results, the Neoniti™ rotary file system is preferred because it maintains the original shape of curved root canals better than One Shape™; even though this benefit comes at the cost of an increase in preparation time in clinical practice, the better technical performance may be more important than a difference in procedural time. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8443393 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Hindawi |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84433932021-09-16 Comparison of Canal Transportation, Separation Rate, and Preparation Time between One Shape and Neoniti (Neolix): An In Vitro CBCT Study Kuzekanani, Maryam Sadeghi, Faranak Hatami, Nima Rad, Maryam Darijani, Mansoureh Walsh, Laurence James Int J Dent Research Article PURPOSE: This in vitro study compared root canal preparation in curved mesiobuccal canals of molar teeth using either the One Shape™ or the Neoniti (Neolix) rotary NiTi single-file systems, assessing canal transportation, instrument separation and time required for preparation. Methods. Extracted maxillary and mandibular human molar teeth with mesiobuccal canals having apical angles of curvature between 25 and 35(o) were selected and embedded in acrylic resin blocks, and an initial CBCT was taken. The teeth were divided into two equal groups (n = 20), and the canals were cleaned and shaped using either Neoniti™ or One Shape™ engine-driven NiTi rotary files. Each individual instrument was used to prepare 5 canals. The time required for the preparation of each canal was recorded. Postpreparation CBCT scans were taken and used to determine the extent of canal transportation at levels of 2, 4, 6, and 8 mm from the apex. The Kolmogorov–Smirnov test for normality was applied, and then, datasets were compared using independent t-tests, with a threshold of P < 0.05. RESULTS: Neoniti rotary files caused significantly less canal transportation of the curved canals (P=0.0001). On the other hand, the time required for canal preparation was significantly shorter for One Shape (P=0.0001). No instrument separation was recorded in both groups. CONCLUSION: Based on these results, the Neoniti™ rotary file system is preferred because it maintains the original shape of curved root canals better than One Shape™; even though this benefit comes at the cost of an increase in preparation time in clinical practice, the better technical performance may be more important than a difference in procedural time. Hindawi 2021-09-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8443393/ /pubmed/34539788 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/6457071 Text en Copyright © 2021 Maryam Kuzekanani et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Kuzekanani, Maryam Sadeghi, Faranak Hatami, Nima Rad, Maryam Darijani, Mansoureh Walsh, Laurence James Comparison of Canal Transportation, Separation Rate, and Preparation Time between One Shape and Neoniti (Neolix): An In Vitro CBCT Study |
title | Comparison of Canal Transportation, Separation Rate, and Preparation Time between One Shape and Neoniti (Neolix): An In Vitro CBCT Study |
title_full | Comparison of Canal Transportation, Separation Rate, and Preparation Time between One Shape and Neoniti (Neolix): An In Vitro CBCT Study |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Canal Transportation, Separation Rate, and Preparation Time between One Shape and Neoniti (Neolix): An In Vitro CBCT Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Canal Transportation, Separation Rate, and Preparation Time between One Shape and Neoniti (Neolix): An In Vitro CBCT Study |
title_short | Comparison of Canal Transportation, Separation Rate, and Preparation Time between One Shape and Neoniti (Neolix): An In Vitro CBCT Study |
title_sort | comparison of canal transportation, separation rate, and preparation time between one shape and neoniti (neolix): an in vitro cbct study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8443393/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34539788 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/6457071 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kuzekananimaryam comparisonofcanaltransportationseparationrateandpreparationtimebetweenoneshapeandneonitineolixaninvitrocbctstudy AT sadeghifaranak comparisonofcanaltransportationseparationrateandpreparationtimebetweenoneshapeandneonitineolixaninvitrocbctstudy AT hataminima comparisonofcanaltransportationseparationrateandpreparationtimebetweenoneshapeandneonitineolixaninvitrocbctstudy AT radmaryam comparisonofcanaltransportationseparationrateandpreparationtimebetweenoneshapeandneonitineolixaninvitrocbctstudy AT darijanimansoureh comparisonofcanaltransportationseparationrateandpreparationtimebetweenoneshapeandneonitineolixaninvitrocbctstudy AT walshlaurencejames comparisonofcanaltransportationseparationrateandpreparationtimebetweenoneshapeandneonitineolixaninvitrocbctstudy |